Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Copolymerization termination

The kinetics of copolymerization and the microstructure of copolymers can be markedly influenced by the addition of Lewis acids. In particular, Lewis acids are effective in enhancing the tendency towards alternation in copolymerization of donor-acceptor monomer pairs and can give dramatic enhancements in the rate of copolymerization and much higher molecular weights than are observed for similar conditions without the Lewis acid. Copolymerizations where the electron deficient monomer is an acrylic monomer e.g. AN, MA, MMA) and the electron rich monomer is S or a diene have been the most widely studied." Strictly alternating copolymers of MMA and S can be prepared in the presence of, for example, dictliylaluminum scsquichloridc. In the absence of Lewis acids, there is only a small tendency for alternation in MAA-S copolymerization terminal model reactivity ratios are ca 0.51 and 0.49 - Section 7.3.1.2.3. Lewis acids used include EtAlCT, Et.AlCL ElALCL, ZnCT, TiCU, BCl- LiC104 and SnCL. [Pg.435]

Cross termination n. In free radical copolymerization, termination by reaction of two radicals terminated by monomer units of the opposite type, i.e., termination, by combination or disproportionation with rate constant /cab Crosstermination is often favored over termination by reaction between two like radicals due to polar effects. [Pg.244]

We saw in the last chapter that the stationary-state approximation is apphc-able to free-radical homopolymerizations, and the same is true of copolymerizations. Of course, it takes a brief time for the stationary-state radical concentration to be reached, but this period is insignificant compared to the total duration of a polymerization reaction. If the total concentration of radicals is constant, this means that the rate of crossover between the different types of terminal units is also equal, or that R... [Pg.426]

These observations suggest how the terminal mechanism can be proved to apply to a copolymerization reaction if experiments exist which permit the number of sequences of a particular length to be determined. If this is possible, we should count the number of Mi s (this is given by the copolymer composition) and the number of Mi Mi and Mi Mi Mi sequences. Specified sequences, of any definite composition, of two units are called dyads those of three units, triads those of four units, tetrads those of five units, pentads and so on. Next we examine the ratio NmjMi/Nmi nd NmjMiMi/NmiMi If these are the same, then the mechanism is shown to have terminal control if not, it may be penultimate control. To prove the penultimate model it would also be necessary to count the number of Mi tetrads. If the tetrad/triad ratio were the same as the triad/dyad ratio, the penultimate model is proved. [Pg.456]

The early kinetic models for copolymerization, Mayo s terminal mechanism (41) and Alfrey s penultimate model (42), did not adequately predict the behavior of SAN systems. Copolymerizations in DMF and toluene indicated that both penultimate and antepenultimate effects had to be considered (43,44). The resulting reactivity model is somewhat compHcated, since there are eight reactivity ratios to consider. [Pg.193]

The first quantitative model, which appeared in 1971, also accounted for possible charge-transfer complex formation (45). Deviation from the terminal model for bulk polymerization was shown to be due to antepenultimate effects (46). Mote recent work with numerical computation and C-nmr spectroscopy data on SAN sequence distributions indicates that the penultimate model is the most appropriate for bulk SAN copolymerization (47,48). A kinetic model for azeotropic SAN copolymerization in toluene has been developed that successfully predicts conversion, rate, and average molecular weight for conversions up to 50% (49). [Pg.193]

Copolymer composition can be predicted for copolymerizations with two or more components, such as those employing acrylonitrile plus a neutral monomer and an ionic dye receptor. These equations are derived by assuming that the component reactions involve only the terminal monomer unit of the chain radical. The theory of multicomponent polymerization kinetics has been treated (35,36). [Pg.279]

Bismaleimides are best defined as low molecular weight, at least diftinctional monomers or prepolymers, or mixtures thereof, that carry maleimide terminations (Eig. 3). Such maleimide end groups can undergo homopolymerization and a wide range of copolymerizations to form a highly cross-linked network. These cure reactions can be effected by the appHcation of heat and, if required, ia the presence of a suitable catalyst. The first patent for cross-linked resias obtained through the homopolymerization or copolymerization of BMI was granted to Rhc ne Poulenc, Erance, ia 1968 (13). Shordy after, a series of patents was issued on poly(amino bismaleimides) (14), which are synthesized from bismaleimide and aromatic diamines. [Pg.23]

A living cationic polymeriza tion of isobutylene and copolymeriza tion of isobutylene and isoprene has been demonstrated (22,23). Living copolymerizations, which proceed in the absence of chain transfer and termination reactions, yield the random copolymer with narrow mol wt distribution and well-defined stmcture, and possibly at a higher polymerization temperature than the current commercial process. The isobutylene—isoprene copolymers are prepared by using cumyl acetate BCl complex in CH Cl or CH2CI2 at —30 C. The copolymer contains 1 8 mol % trans 1,4-isoprene... [Pg.480]

Liquid organic rubbers with reactive functionality can be prepared by several methods. End-functional oligomers are preferred. Chains attached to the network at only one end do not contribute as much strength to the network as those attached at both ends [34], Urethane chemistry is a handy route to such molecules. A hydroxy-terminated oligomer (commonly a polyester or a polyether) can be reacted with excess diisocyanate, and then with a hydroxy methacrylate to form a reactive toughener [35]. The methacrylate ends undergo copolymerization with the rest of the acrylic monomers. The resulting adhesive is especially effective on poIy(vinyl chloride) shown in Scheme 2. [Pg.831]

In contrast to /3-PCPY, ICPY did not initiate copolymerization of MMA with styrene [39] and AN with styrene [40]. However, it accelerated radical polymerization by increasing the rate of initiation in the former case and decreasing the rate of termination in the latter case. The studies on photocopolymerization of MMA with styrene in the presence of ICPY has also been reported [41], /8-PCPY also initiated radical copolymerization of 4-vinylpyridine with methyl methacrylate [42]. However, the ylide retarded the polymerization of N-vinylpyrrolidone, initiated by AIBN at 60°C in benzene [44]. (See also Table 2.)... [Pg.377]

Macromonomers always lead to the formation of graft copolymers. For example, the vinyl-terminated polystyrene can be copolymerized with ethylene to produce a graft copolymer of polyethylene, whereby the vinyl moiety of polystyrene is integrally polymerized into the linear polyethylene backbone ... [Pg.732]

Apart from poly(ethylene glycol), other hydroxyl-terminated polymers and low-molecular weight compounds were condensed with ACPC. An interesting example is the reaction of ACPC with preformed poly(bu-tadiene) possessing terminal OH groups [26]. The reaction was carried out in chloroform solution and (CH3CH2)3N was used as a catalyst. MAIs based on butadiene thus obtained were used for the thermally induced block copolymerization with styrene [26] and dimethyl itaconate [27]. [Pg.738]

Polyaddition reactions based on isocyanate-terminated poly(ethylene glycol)s and subsequent block copolymerization with styrene monomer were utilized for the impregnation of wood [54]. Hazer [55] prepared block copolymers containing poly(ethylene adipate) and po-ly(peroxy carbamate) by an addition of the respective isocyanate-terminated prepolymers to polyazoesters. By both bulk and solution polymerization and subsequent thermal polymerization in the presence of a vinyl monomer, multiblock copolymers could be formed. [Pg.741]

Reactivity ratios for the copolymerization of AN with 7 in methanol at 60 °C, proved to be equal to rx AN= 3,6 0,2 and r%n = 0 0,06, i.e., AN is a much more active component in this binary system. The low reactivity of the vinyl double bond in 7 is explained by the specific effect of the sulfonyl group on its polarity26. In addition to that, the radical formed from 7 does not seem to be stabilized by the sulfonyl group and readily takes part in the chain transfer reaction and chain termination. As a result of this, the rate of copolymerization reaction and the molecular mass of the copolymers decrease with increasing content of 7 in the initial mixture. [Pg.106]

In termination, unsaturated and saturated ends are formed when the propagating species undergo disproportionation, head-to-head linkages when they combine, and other functional groups may be introduced by reactions with inhibitors or transfer agents (Scheme 1.2). In-chain defect structures (within the polymer molecule) can also arise by copolymerization of the unsaturated byproducts of initiation or termination. [Pg.4]

Unsymmetrical azo-compounds find application as initiators of polymerization in special circumstances, for example, as initiators of living radical polymerization [e.g. triphenylmethylazobenzene (30) (see 9.3.4)], as hydroxy radical sources [e.g. a-hydroperoxydiazene (31) (see 3.3.3,1)1, for enhanced solubility in organic solvents [e.g. f-butylazocyclohexanecarbonitrile (32)J, or as high temperature initiators [e.g. t-butylazoformamide (33)]. They have also been used as radical precursors in model studies of cross-termination in copolymerization (Section... [Pg.72]

Termination in heterogeneous polymerization is discussed in Section 5.2.1,5 and the more controversial subject of termination during living radical polymerization is described in Section 5.2.1.6. Termination in copolymerization is addressed in Section 7.3. [Pg.235]

Certain monomers may act as inhibitors in some circumstances. Reactivity ratios for VAc-S copolymerization (r< 0.02, rVu -2.3) and rates of cross propagation are such that small amounts of S are an effective inhibitor of VAc polymerization. The propagating chain with a terminal VAc is very active towards S and adds even when S is present in small amounts. The propagating radical with S adds to VAc only slowly. Other vinyl aromatics also inhibit VAc polymerization.174... [Pg.269]

Any understanding of the kinetics of copolymerization and the structure of copolymers requires a knowledge of the dependence of the initiation, propagation and termination reactions on the chain composition, the nature of the monomers and radicals, and the polymerization medium. This section is principally concerned with propagation and the effects of monomer reactivity on composition and monomer sequence distribution. The influence of solvent and complcxing agents on copolymerization is dealt with in more detail in Section 8.3.1. [Pg.336]

The various copolymerization models that appear in the literature (terminal, penultimate, complex dissociation, complex participation, etc.) should not be considered as alternative descriptions. They are approximations made through necessity to reduce complexity. They should, at best, be considered as a subset of some overall scheme for copolymerization. Any unified theory, if such is possible, would have to take into account all of the factors mentioned above. The models used to describe copolymerization reaction mechanisms arc normally chosen to be the simplest possible model capable of explaining a given set of experimental data. They do not necessarily provide, nor are they meant to be, a complete description of the mechanism. Much of the impetus for model development and drive for understanding of the mechanism of copolymerization conies from the need to predict composition and rates. Developments in models have followed the development and application of analytical techniques that demonstrate the inadequacy of an earlier model. [Pg.337]


See other pages where Copolymerization termination is mentioned: [Pg.258]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.1896]    [Pg.1898]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.1896]    [Pg.1898]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.729]    [Pg.739]    [Pg.746]    [Pg.750]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.297]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.106 ]




SEARCH



Binary copolymerization according to the terminal model

Chain copolymerization terminal model

Copolymerization coupling, termination

Copolymerization equation terminal model

Deviations from Terminal Copolymerization Model

Diffusion-controlled termination radical copolymerization

Disproportionation cross termination, copolymerization

Terminal Model for Rate of Radical Copolymerization

Terminal model copolymerization

Terminal model for copolymerization

Terminal model of copolymerization

© 2024 chempedia.info