Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Conversion rate density measurement

The authors may well be correct when concluding that the surprising weakness of inhibition by aromatics results from slow desorption of a product. However, their model and rate equation appear questionable. Like aromatics, hydrogen is also strongly adsorbed, and so is as likely a candidate as toluene for accumulation on the surface. Also, a single-site mechanism is quite improbable with two strongly adsorbed products. Moreover, the "initial" rates were measured at conversions that entailed a decrease of up to 13% in fluid density, an effect not corrected for. Lastly, the trial equation was derived only from rates at low conversion and cannot be relied upon to reflect the behavior of the reaction as it progresses. [Pg.289]

The Direct Methanol Fuel Cell, DMFC, (see Fig. 7-6 in section 7.2.2.4.) is another low temperature fuel cell enjoying a renaissance after significant improvements in current density. The DMFC runs on either liquid or, with better performance but higher system complexity, on gaseous methanol and is normally based on a solid polymer electrolyte (SPFC). R-Ru catalysts were found to produce best oxidation results at the anode, still the power density is relatively low [5, 29]. Conversion rates up to 34 % of the energy content into electricity were measured, an efficiency of 45 % is expected to be feasible in the future. SPFC in the power order of several kW to be used in automobile applications are currently in the development phase. [Pg.178]

The 200 to 400 nm spectral Irradlance Inside the CER was measured using a Gamma Scientific Spectroradlometer. A selenium photovoltaic cell and Corning 7-45 ultraviolet filter was used to monitor the UV Irradlance. A 1 x 2 cm silicon solar cell was used to measure the near-IR Irradlance. CER photon flux was also calibrated by using 0-nltrobenzaldehyde (0-NBA) as an actlnometer( ). Outdoor photon flux was measured by dispersing 0-NBA In thin films (25 urn) of polymethyl methacrylate. These films were then exposed at the outdoor site behind a neutral density filter and were examined on a weekly basis. Outdoor weekly UV photon flux was calculated based on the conversion rate of the 0-NBA. [Pg.268]

The quantum yield of conversion of 4-chlorophenol was not measured with high accuracy ( 0.4 0.1 ). At low conversion rate (<0.1), the relative error on the conversion of 4-chlorophenol determined by HPLC measurement is about 25%. Moreover, the optical density at 254 nm increeised much with the progress of the reaction ( about a factor of 5 for 15% of transformation ). At conversion rates higher than 0.1, secondary reactions are not negligible trtien the solution was Irradiated at 296 nm. Nevertheless, the initial quantum yield of formation of Cl ( 0.25 0.05 ) appeared to be significantly lower than the quantum yield of conversion of 4-chlorophenol (37). [Pg.22]

For calculation of the volumetric flow rate only the cross section area of the pipe is to be known. In order to give flow under standard conditions the temperature and pressure must be measured, and for conversion to mass flow the composition or density of the gas must be determined. These process parameters are often monitored by calibrated instrumentation. [Pg.1054]

Figure 16. Propylene conversion and product-selectivity results for the membrane-reactor measurements performed at 723 K with pure propylene as the feed. The results in panel a were for the SOFC with a Cu—ceria—YSZ anode, and the results in panel b were for the Cu-molybdena-YSZ anode. In panel a, the points are the rate of CO2 production, and the line was calculated from the current density and eq 8. In panel b, the points show the production of acrolein, and the line was calculated from eq 9. (Reprinted with permission from ref 165. Copyright 2002 Elsevier.)... Figure 16. Propylene conversion and product-selectivity results for the membrane-reactor measurements performed at 723 K with pure propylene as the feed. The results in panel a were for the SOFC with a Cu—ceria—YSZ anode, and the results in panel b were for the Cu-molybdena-YSZ anode. In panel a, the points are the rate of CO2 production, and the line was calculated from the current density and eq 8. In panel b, the points show the production of acrolein, and the line was calculated from eq 9. (Reprinted with permission from ref 165. Copyright 2002 Elsevier.)...
It is appropriate at this point to briefly discuss the experimental procedures used to determine polymerization rates for both step and radical chain polymerizations. Rp can be experimentally followed by measuring the change in any property that differs for the monomer(s) and polymer, for example, solubility, density, refractive index, and spectral absorption [Collins et al., 1973 Giz et al., 2001 McCaffery, 1970 Stickler, 1987 Yamazoe et al., 2001]. Some techniques are equally useful for step and chain polymerizations, while others are more appropriate for only one or the other. Techniques useful for radical chain polymerizations are generally applicable to ionic chain polymerizations. The utility of any particular technique also depends on its precision and accuracy at low, medium, and high percentages of conversion. Some of the techniques have the inherent advantage of not needing to stop the polymerization to determine the percent conversion, that is, conversion can be followed versus time on the same reaction sample. [Pg.208]

Dilatometric technique can also be used for determination of polymerization rate in the case of multimonomer polymerization. However, in this case calibration of the dilatometric method is more complex. The substrates and products are both polymers with similar molecular weights. Difference in density during the course of polymerization is connected only with the conversion of double bonds to the single bonds. It is difficult to obtain a macromolecular product in which double bonds are fully converted to single bonds. Calibration must be based on simultaneous measurements of Ah and independent method (e.g., IR spectroscopy) and calculation of (1/dp l/d]vi). [Pg.136]

Our observation of the hydrated electron band at a 5 /xsec. delay cannot be attributed to the thermal reaction H + OH - e aq + H20, because the rate constant of 1.8 X 107Af 1 sec. 1 (21) permits only a negligible conversion of H atoms below pH 10. Therefore, the cases indicated as (+) and (+ + ) are taken as definite proof of photoionization. The cases indicated as (f) are less certain, although a photographic density difference of proper lifetime was measured densitometrically because the weak absorptions made the delineation from other transients, such as short-lived triplets, less certain. The absence of the hydrated electron... [Pg.287]

In Equation (35), an estimation of the mass transfer with the Weisz-Prater criterion is given. By taking always reasonable estimations or overestimated values, one obtains a good conclusion if mass transfer is present or not. For the characteristic length, 200 pm as particle diameter is used. The reaction order usually has the value of 1 to 4 a value of 4 would therefore be a worst case scenario. The catalyst density can be measured, or the common estimation of 1.3 kg/m3 can be used, which should not be too erroneous for Li-doped MgO. The observed reaction rate re is calculated from the concentration of CH4 at the inlet of the reaction cch4 0 multiplied with the highest observed conversion of 25% (the highest initial value for all tested catalysts), divided by the inverse flow rate, corrected by the reactor temperature. The calculation of re is shown in Equation (33) ... [Pg.264]


See other pages where Conversion rate density measurement is mentioned: [Pg.217]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.619]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.1298]    [Pg.1029]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.888]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.159]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.409 ]




SEARCH



Conversion density

Conversion rate

Conversion rate density

Density measuring

Measuring conversion

Measuring rate

Rate density

Rate measurement

© 2024 chempedia.info