Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Conventional polymers polymer composites

Conventional polymer-metal composites involve the dispersion of filler in a polymer matrix. Two methods of packing filler particles in a polymer matrix have evolved during the past 30 years "random" distributions and "segregated" distributions. Continuity in the "random" packing method relies on the formation of a network strictly by the chance contact between filler particles as governed by percolation... [Pg.109]

Micron-sized fillers, such as glass fibers, carbonfibers, carbon black, talc, and micronsized silica particles have been considered as conventional fillers. Polymer composites filled with conventional fillers have been widely investigated by both academic and industrial researchers. A wide spectrum of archival reports is available on how these fillers impact the properties. As expected, various fundamental issues of interest to nanocomposites research, such as the state of filler dispersion, filler-matrix interactions, and processing methods, have already been widely analyzed and documented in the context of conventional composites, especially those of carbon black and silica-filled rubber compounds [16], It is worth mentioning that carbon black (CB) could not be considered as a nanofiller. There appears to be a general tendency in contemporary literature to designate CB as a nanofiller - apparently derived from... [Pg.360]

Borosilicate glass fibres (which are most often used in conventional polymer matrix composites). [Pg.462]

It is noteworthy that this new type of polymer-polymer composites, the microfibrillar reinforced composites (MFC), was developed during the last decade [32-35]. In contrast to the classical composites, i.e., those reinforced by discontinuous or continuous fibers, MFCs cannot be manufactured by conventional melt blending of the starting components, the matrix and the reinforcing materials. [Pg.447]

Figure 11.1 Schematic representation of various types of composites conventional polymer-clay composite (a) interealated polymer-clay nanocomposite (b) and exfoliated polymer-clay nanocomposite (c). Figure 11.1 Schematic representation of various types of composites conventional polymer-clay composite (a) interealated polymer-clay nanocomposite (b) and exfoliated polymer-clay nanocomposite (c).
Polymer nanocomposites represent a new and promising area of polymer research. Among the particles used to form nanocomposites, organically modified clays are of particular interest, hi such systems, the combination of high aspect ratio clay mono- or multilayers and their interactions with the matrix polymer can lead to improvements in barrier, thermal, and mechanical properties at far lower loading levels than are typically used in conventional filled polymer composites [1,2,3]. [Pg.2946]

As for conventional linear polymers, gel permeation chromatography (GPC) can be used to find information on the composition of dendrimers, including their polydispersities. Obtaining standards of known relative molar mass and polydispersity is a problem with dendrimers, so the approach that has been taken most often is to use polystyrene standards, as described in Chapter 6. [Pg.139]

Micro-composites are formed when the polymer chain is unable to intercalate into the silicate layer and therefore phase separated polymer/clay composites are formed. Their properties remain the same as the conventional micro-composites as shown in Figure 2(a). Intercalated nano-composite is obtained when the polymer chain is inserted between clay layers such that the interlayer spacing is expanded, but the layers still bear a well-defined spatial relationship to each other as shown in Figure 2(b). Exfoliated nano-composites are formed when the layers of the day have been completely separated and the individual layers are distributed throughout the organic matrix as shown in Figure 2(c). [Pg.32]

Protein polymers based on Lys-25 were prepared by recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology and bacterial protein expression. The main advantage of this approach is the ability to directly produce high molecular weight polypeptides of exact amino acid sequence with high fidelity as required for this investigation. In contrast to conventional polymer synthesis, protein biosynthesis proceeds with near-absolute control of macromolecular architecture, i.e., size, composition, sequence, topology, and stereochemistry. Biosynthetic polyfa-amino acids) can be considered as model uniform polymers and may possess unique structures and, hence, materials properties, as a consequence of their sequence specificity [11]. Protein biosynthesis affords an opportunity to completely specify the primary structure of the polypeptide repeat and analyze the effect of sequence and structural uniformity on the properties of the protein network. [Pg.125]

First and most importantly, real-time NIR monitoring enabled real-time control of the process. For a given product, the molecular weight and end-group balance in the prepolymer exiting the front end or melt part of the process must be controlled at specified levels in order for the back end or solid-phase part of the process to successfully produce the intended polymer composition. In addition, the variability in prepolymer composition must be controlled with very tight tolerances to keep the variation in final product composition within specification limits. Since the process dynamics in the front end were more rapid than those in conventional PET processes, the conventional analytical approach involving off-line analysis of samples obtained every 2-A hours was not sufficient to achieve the desired product quality. [Pg.516]

A material, such as (a) a terpolymer of propylene, ethylene and butene-1, (b) a polyolefin composition, which includes about 31 to 39% of a copolymer of propylene and ethylene and about 58 to 72% of a terpolymer of propylene, ethylene and butene-1 or (c) a polyolefin composition, which includes about 30 to 65% of a copolymer of propylene and butene-1 and about 35 to 70% of a copolymer of propylene and ethylene, is irradiated and extruded through a die in the presence of a physical expanding agent and a cell nucleating agent to produce a structure having a density, which is at least 10 times less than the initial density of the material. The foam articles exhibit improved flexibility and low temperature toughness compared to conventional propylene polymer materials. [Pg.67]

In fact, even in pure block copolymer (say, diblock copolymer) solutions the self-association behavior of blocks of each type leads to very useful microstructures (see Fig. 1.7), analogous to association colloids formed by short-chain surfactants. The optical, electrical, and mechanical properties of such composites can be significantly different from those of conventional polymer blends (usually simple spherical dispersions). Conventional blends are formed by quenching processes and result in coarse composites in contrast, the above materials result from equilibrium structures and reversible phase transitions and therefore could lead to smart materials capable of responding to suitable external stimuli. [Pg.18]


See other pages where Conventional polymers polymer composites is mentioned: [Pg.656]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.553]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.885]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.653]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.323]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.433 , Pg.437 ]




SEARCH



Comparison with conventional polymer composites

Composite conventional polymer based

Conventional composite

Conventional polymers

© 2024 chempedia.info