Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Controlled buffer

Before leaving the subject of buffer solutions, it is necessary to draw attention to a possible erroneous deduction from equation (21), namely that the hydrogen-ion concentration of a buffer solution is dependent only upon the ratio of the concentrations of acid and salt and upon Ka, and not upon the actual concentrations otherwise expressed, that the pH of such a buffer mixture should not change upon dilution with water. This is approximately although not strictly true. In deducing equation (18), concentrations have been substituted for activities, a step which is not entirely justifiable except in dilute solutions. The exact expression controlling buffer action is ... [Pg.48]

Eventually, after 40-50 min of oxidant stress, intracellular calcium increased. These changes were irreversible when cells were reperfused with control buffer at the end of the protocol. Redrawn with permission from Burton et al. (1990). [Pg.60]

Figure 2. Zymogram of gCenA (A-I) and ngCenA (J-Q) after incubation with C. fimi protease. Cellulases, bound to Avicel, were incubated with protease or control buffer for 72 hr at 30° C, then centrifuged to give cellulose-bound (A-E, J-N) and supernatant (F-I, O-Q) fractions. Products were separated on a SDS gel, replicated onto CMC-agarose and developed with Congo red. A,J. buffer control (4°C incubation) B,F,K,0, protease C,G,L,P, protease + PMSF control D,H,M,Q, buffer control E,I,N, buffer + PMSF control. Figure 2. Zymogram of gCenA (A-I) and ngCenA (J-Q) after incubation with C. fimi protease. Cellulases, bound to Avicel, were incubated with protease or control buffer for 72 hr at 30° C, then centrifuged to give cellulose-bound (A-E, J-N) and supernatant (F-I, O-Q) fractions. Products were separated on a SDS gel, replicated onto CMC-agarose and developed with Congo red. A,J. buffer control (4°C incubation) B,F,K,0, protease C,G,L,P, protease + PMSF control D,H,M,Q, buffer control E,I,N, buffer + PMSF control.
The data presented in Table 3.1 demonstrate that 0.3% (w/v) ninhydrin has a marked effect at pH 5.0 on bubble production in agarose gels containing distilled water. This concentration of ninhydrin reduced bubble production at pH 5.0 to only one third of that observed in the control buffered at the same pH, whereas no significant effect at pH 8.0 was observed (Table 3.1). This pH dependence of the chemical effect is important for the reason that ninhydrin is known to react appreciably with a-amino acids, peptides, and proteins in various buffered aqueous solutions ranging in pH from 5.0 to a maximum of 7.0 (ref. 232,233) and specifically in aqueous solutions containing citrate buffer (as used in this study) at pH 5.0 (ref. 233). While ninhydrin is also known to react with many amino compounds and ammonia (ref. 233), such interfering... [Pg.59]

The reverse situation holds for radicals with low p/if-values when (39f) becomes diffusion-controlled. Buffers present in solution also enter these proton transfer reactions and affect the rate of protonation and deprotonation according to their pAT-valucs. Buffers are therefore used to increase the rate of exchange between acid-base forms at the pH range where these forms may exchange slowly, and as a result e.s.r. lines may be narrowed by the effect of buffers (see Section 6). [Pg.270]

Silica gel is a polymer of silicic acid and has the general formula Si02 x H20. There are many ways to prepare silica gel. Let us consider only one preparation of silica gel to demonstrate how and where differences or variations in the silica may contribute to a different bonded (final) phase. A common way of making silica gel particles for LC is to use acidic hydrolysis of sodium silicate, followed by polycondensation dehydration of orthosilicic acid and grinding of the silica to make granular particles (e.g., 10 jam). If the reaction is not controlled (buffer, pH, temperature, etc.) the hydrogel will... [Pg.210]

The proposed design is a two-CSTR system with minimum residence time per tank of 24 minutes. Each tank is supplied with 5% w/w (1.45 AO hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2> reagent controlled based on pH measured at the exit of the tank. Detailed tank design was such that a mixing delay of less than 10 seconds was expected. The neutralization tanks are followed by a flocculation tank with a minimum residence time of 10 minutes. There is an agitated level-controlled buffer tank upstream of the neutralization tanks, giving about 12 hours of concentration and flow equalization at maximum flow. The scheme to be evaluated is shown in Fig. 9. [Pg.379]

The solubility measure describes the concentration reached in solution, when a pure phase of the material is allowed to dissolve in the solvent for a defined period of time, at a defined temperature (and pressure). Most often for pharmaceutical purposes, the pure phase is a solid, ideally a crystalline solid, and the liquid is water or a buffered aqueous solution, at a controlled temperature (often 25 or 37 °C) and ambient pressure. The purity of the solid can have a large effect on measured solubility. Solubility can be measured in water or in pH-controlled buffers. In water, the extent of solubility for ionizable compounds will depend upon the p fCa values and the nature of the counterion. In pH-controlled aqueous buffered solution, at equilibrium, the solubility will depend upon the compound s intrinsic solubility, its plQ, and the ionic strength. It may also depend upon the relative solubility of the initial added compound and the solubility of the salt formed by the compound with the buffer salts, with which the solid may equilibrate. In any buffer or solvent system, the measured solubility may depend on the time of sampling, as solubility kinetics... [Pg.56]

As a second example of mineral-controlled buffer capacity, consider the reaction in pure water between the clays kaolinite and illite (here assumed the same as muscovite), which may be written... [Pg.187]

ISH is not standardized, since standardized tissue does not exist, and can be accomplished in any of several approaches, the steps of which are not always parallel (Table 11.1 e.g., sectioning after/be-fore embedding). Optimization of ISH for a given tissue requires finding the optimal combination of the different steps, controls, buffers and probes (Table 11.2). Most often, fixation is the crucial step. [Pg.245]

Add 2 pL/well of control buffer (no-enzyme control) to columns 1 and 2 for the positive control wells. [Pg.233]

Aliquots (0.5 ml) of synaptosomal suspension were preincubated for 25 min at 30° C. When effects of drugs were examined, they were added to the synaptosomal suspension at the beginning of the preincubation period at various concentrations. Following preincubation Ca uptake was initiated by the addition of 0.5 ml of one of the following solutions, each containing 0.5 yCi CaC /ml (1) control buffer (2)... [Pg.148]

Addition of Ca to synaptosomes incubated in control buffer (132 mM Na, 5 mM K) results in a rapid uptake of the isotope during the first five seconds, a slower accumulation for the next 25 seconds, and very little or no additional uptake thereafter. Increasing the [K] in the incubation media markedly augments Ca uptake. This stimulatory effect of K seems to occur immediately and is essentially complete within the first 30 sec. Veratridine also increases synaptosomal Ca uptake, but its onset of action is slower than that of K and requires 3 min or longer for completion. The maximum effect of veratridine is similar to that of K, however, and the stimulatory effect of both K and veratridine on Ca uptake are concentration-dependent. [Pg.149]

Controlled Buffer. By the appropriate choice of ratio of silica to NaOH, one can effectively buffer hydrogen ion activity in the important industrial range of 9 to 11. When systems performance is dependent on anionic surfactants and sequestrants, this property is valued greatly. [Pg.574]

Adherent platelets ratio vWF/control buffer Protein coating... [Pg.546]

The source and destination vials as well as the inside of the capillary are filled with a buffer, also referred to as carrier electrolyte or background electrolyte. The purpose of the buffer is to maintain the pH as well as the conductivity during the electrophoretic separation. A controlled pH is crucial for maintaining a constant net charge on the biomolecules and, thus, maintaining their electrophoretic mobility A controlled conductivity is required so that Joule heating can be controlled. Buffer concentrations in CE are typically in the order 10-100 mM. [Pg.72]

Add prewarmed (3-NADPH and swirl gently to start reaction, keep covered throughout incubation (for minus (3-NADPH controls buffer is substituted for (3-NADPH). [Pg.511]

In this assay, the spermatozoa in the well are suspended in a solution containing the chemoattractant. The capillary, containing either a control buffer or the chemoattractant, is immersed in the sperm suspension. When the capillary contains buffer only, the spermatozoa sense a descending gradient of the chemoattractant as they move from the well to the capillary (Figure 7). When the chemoattractant is in both the capillary and the well, they sense no gradient at all. A comparison is made between these two conditions. This assay thus measures the sperm tendency to leave the chemoattractant rather than to accumulate in it. In the case of sperm chemotaxis, sperm accumulation in the capillary is... [Pg.420]

Due to the counterion localization, conformations of branched macroions that comprise strongly dissociating groups (charge is quenched) are almost insensitive to the addition of salt, up to relatively high salt concentrations. The ability of a branched polyion to maintain a virtually constant ionic strength in its interior is of special interest for potential applications, where a controlled (buffered) microenvironment is essential (e.g., colloidal bionanoreactors, smart nanocontainers for biologically active molecules, etc.). [Pg.4]

Figure 7. Emission responses of poly(I0,12-PCDA) coatings with 0.5% 2 and anti-E. coli antibodies, in 96-well plates caused by (A) Solutions ofE. coli 10 /mL (O), l(f/mL (A) and control buffer (M) (B) Iterative filtration of 100 pL of E. coli solutions (grey bars) and control buffer (hatched bars). (9)... Figure 7. Emission responses of poly(I0,12-PCDA) coatings with 0.5% 2 and anti-E. coli antibodies, in 96-well plates caused by (A) Solutions ofE. coli 10 /mL (O), l(f/mL (A) and control buffer (M) (B) Iterative filtration of 100 pL of E. coli solutions (grey bars) and control buffer (hatched bars). (9)...

See other pages where Controlled buffer is mentioned: [Pg.535]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.723]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.181]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.598 ]




SEARCH



Blood buffer control

Buffer Solutions The Control of pH

Buffer and pH control

Buffer control

Buffers Controlling pH

Buffers, controlling

Control with buffers

Kinetic control buffer solutions

PH buffer control

Thermodynamic control buffer solutions

© 2024 chempedia.info