Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Buffers control

Adjust the Set buffer control until the meter reading agrees with the known pH of the buffer solution. [Pg.567]

Some naturally soft mains waters may be unsuitable because they contain dissolved copper ions that could lead to aluminum failure. Poor buffer control can also cause attack. [Pg.582]

The normalized luciferase activity is calculated by dividing the relative light units (RLU) of firefly luciferase activity-background luminescence by that of Renilla luciferase-background luminescence. Typically, the cell lysate background is around 200 to 300 RLU (similar to that of a buffer control) and about 104 to 105 and 5 to 20 x 103 RLU for firefly and Renilla luciferase luminescence, respectively. [Pg.187]

For potassium depletion, cells are washed with potassium-free buffer (140 mM NaCl, 20 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-l-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), ImM CaCh, Img/mL o-glucose, pH 7.4) and then rinsed in hypotonic buffer (potassium-free buffer 1 1 diluted with distilled water) for five minutes. Then, cells are quickly washed three times in potassium-free buffer followed by incubation for 20 minutes at 37°C in buffer. Control experiments are performed in the same manner, except all solutions additionally contain 10 mM KCl. [Pg.352]

The hydrothermal chemistry of methane also provides another buffering control on the global biogeochemical carbon cycle by serving as the site of reactions that act as sources and sinks of methane. Examples of source reactions are... [Pg.543]

Figure 2. Zymogram of gCenA (A-I) and ngCenA (J-Q) after incubation with C. fimi protease. Cellulases, bound to Avicel, were incubated with protease or control buffer for 72 hr at 30° C, then centrifuged to give cellulose-bound (A-E, J-N) and supernatant (F-I, O-Q) fractions. Products were separated on a SDS gel, replicated onto CMC-agarose and developed with Congo red. A,J. buffer control (4°C incubation) B,F,K,0, protease C,G,L,P, protease + PMSF control D,H,M,Q, buffer control E,I,N, buffer + PMSF control. Figure 2. Zymogram of gCenA (A-I) and ngCenA (J-Q) after incubation with C. fimi protease. Cellulases, bound to Avicel, were incubated with protease or control buffer for 72 hr at 30° C, then centrifuged to give cellulose-bound (A-E, J-N) and supernatant (F-I, O-Q) fractions. Products were separated on a SDS gel, replicated onto CMC-agarose and developed with Congo red. A,J. buffer control (4°C incubation) B,F,K,0, protease C,G,L,P, protease + PMSF control D,H,M,Q, buffer control E,I,N, buffer + PMSF control.
Blackwood, A.D., Curran, L.J., Moore, B.D. and Hailing, P.J. (1994) Organic phase buffers control biocatalyst activity independent of initial aqueous pH. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1206, 161-165. [Pg.362]

Karingithi, C. W. 2002. Hydrothermal Mineral Buffers Controlling Reactive Gases Concentrations in the Greater Olkaria Geothermal System, Kenya. MSc thesis, University of Iceland, 94 pp. [Pg.333]

Adjust the buffer control dial so that the display reads pH 7.00. [Pg.1115]

The quantization of the actual data is performed including the buffer control. [Pg.333]

Since buffers control pH best at their pKa, pick one close to your desired pH. The most common buffer used in HPLC is phosphate. It has two usable pKa s, 2.1 and 7.1, and is UV transparent. A 100-mM solution of phosphate precipitates in solution of >50% MeOH or 70% acetonitrile. Other buffers in common use are acetate, pKa 4.8, formate, pKa 3.8, and chloroacetate, pKa 2.9 all absorb in the UV below 225 nM. Sulfonate, pKa 1.8 and 6.9, should be substituted for phosphate when analyzing mixtures of organic phosphates. [Pg.90]

Some naturally occurring polymers have been reported to exhibit efflux pump modulating properties. For example, a drug delivery system based on chitosan has been shown to nearly double the oral bioavailability of the P-glycoprotein substrate rhodamine 123 in vivo in rats in comparison with buffer control (Foger et al. 2006c). [Pg.130]

Fig. 6 Examples of data obtained with catalytic RuCl-PVP layer in films (a) SWV of PSS/RuCl-PVP/DNA/PDDA/DNA films after incubations at 37°C and pH 5.5 with saturated styrene oxide (SO) for 5, 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively. Incubations in toluene gave no changes in peak current, (b) Influence of reaction time (37°C, pH 6.5) of PSS/RuCl-PVP/DNA/PDDA/DNA films incubated in 2 mM dimethyl sulfate ( ), 2 mM methyl methanesulfonate (O), and buffer control (A) on ratio of final SWV peak current to initial peak current of PSS/RuCl-PVP. (From Ref. [49] with permission. Copyright American Chemical Society.) (View this art in color at www. dekker. com.)... Fig. 6 Examples of data obtained with catalytic RuCl-PVP layer in films (a) SWV of PSS/RuCl-PVP/DNA/PDDA/DNA films after incubations at 37°C and pH 5.5 with saturated styrene oxide (SO) for 5, 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively. Incubations in toluene gave no changes in peak current, (b) Influence of reaction time (37°C, pH 6.5) of PSS/RuCl-PVP/DNA/PDDA/DNA films incubated in 2 mM dimethyl sulfate ( ), 2 mM methyl methanesulfonate (O), and buffer control (A) on ratio of final SWV peak current to initial peak current of PSS/RuCl-PVP. (From Ref. [49] with permission. Copyright American Chemical Society.) (View this art in color at www. dekker. com.)...
Figure 1. HPLC peptide map comparisons (215 nm) using different membrane types. In situ tryptic digestion of replicate apomyoglobin bands (ICX) pmols loaded/lane) electroblotted from a single gel onto 2—Nitrocellulose, 2—Immobilon P, J—Trans-Blot PVDF. B—peaks in a trypsin/buffer control chromatogram. P—PVP-40 peak which is variable from run to run, but more prominent on Trans-Blot membranes. Figure 1. HPLC peptide map comparisons (215 nm) using different membrane types. In situ tryptic digestion of replicate apomyoglobin bands (ICX) pmols loaded/lane) electroblotted from a single gel onto 2—Nitrocellulose, 2—Immobilon P, J—Trans-Blot PVDF. B—peaks in a trypsin/buffer control chromatogram. P—PVP-40 peak which is variable from run to run, but more prominent on Trans-Blot membranes.
Not all iron oxides are available for reduction. Some iron minerals are solid crystals or even entire iron grains, which makes them resistant to microbial reduction (Lovley, 1991 Postma, 1993 Heron et al., 1994b). Other iron oxides or hydroxides are amorphous and readily reducible. Over time, even some crystalline minerals such as goethite and hematite may be reduced in the complex environment in leachate (Heron and Christensen, 1995). This indicates that the importance of iron as a redox buffer controlling the size of plumes is not given just by the amount of iron oxides present. The composition and microbial availability of iron for reduction are key parameters. Methods for the actual quantification of the microbial iron reduction capacity have, however, not been developed. [Pg.5121]

Tirkkonen, S. Urtti, A. Paronen, P. Buffer controlled release of indomethacin from ethylcellulose microcapsules. Int. J. Pharm. 1995, 124 (2), 219-229. [Pg.613]

Primary engineering control 2 With optimization or modification 3 Pbsolete application 4 Secondary or buffer control. [Pg.2187]

It is possible that the toxin was not properly activated, and a new sample of toxin should be activated, using freshly prepared DTT. It is possible that the concentration of NAD in the assay was too low and was hydrolyzed. Because NAD in solution is susceptible to hydrolysis, it should be stored in small portions at -20°C and the stock supply replaced regularly. Mutant toxins may, in fact, be inactive and it is suggested that Assays 3 and 4 be used to confirm or negate this possibility. CT activity may also be affected by salt and/or protein concentrations in the assay. Excessive salt can stimulate toxin activity buffer controls should, therefore, be run in each assay. High protein concentrations may result in decreased or variable toxin activity in Assay 2, the presence of ovalbumin minimizes nonspecific protein effects. [Pg.30]

Figure 4 Inhibition of ice recrystallization. Samples in 10 pi microcapillaries (740 pm diameter) were frozen and placed at -6°C and examined between crossed polarizing filters. Images were taken prior to, and after overnight incubation, but only the latter images are shown. From left to right samples include sample buffer controls (I, 2), bovine serum albumin, a control protein diluted to 0.2 and 0.02 mg/ ml, respectively (3,4), serial dilutions of 0.2, 0.02 and 0.002 mg/ ml Type I fish antifreeze protein in buffer (5-7), Chryseobacterium sp. cultures (8, 9), and E. coli cultures (10, 11). Note that only the fish AFP and the Chryseobacterium sp. cidtures have crystals too small to be detected at this magnification and the overlying feathery pattern, typical of snap frozen samples, is apparent. Bacterial cultures were at 2 x 10 CFU/ ml. Lines indicate duplicate samples and arrows indicate samples that were diluted. Figure 4 Inhibition of ice recrystallization. Samples in 10 pi microcapillaries (740 pm diameter) were frozen and placed at -6°C and examined between crossed polarizing filters. Images were taken prior to, and after overnight incubation, but only the latter images are shown. From left to right samples include sample buffer controls (I, 2), bovine serum albumin, a control protein diluted to 0.2 and 0.02 mg/ ml, respectively (3,4), serial dilutions of 0.2, 0.02 and 0.002 mg/ ml Type I fish antifreeze protein in buffer (5-7), Chryseobacterium sp. cultures (8, 9), and E. coli cultures (10, 11). Note that only the fish AFP and the Chryseobacterium sp. cidtures have crystals too small to be detected at this magnification and the overlying feathery pattern, typical of snap frozen samples, is apparent. Bacterial cultures were at 2 x 10 CFU/ ml. Lines indicate duplicate samples and arrows indicate samples that were diluted.
Concentrations of methanethiol measured in headspace samples of the experimental cheeses are summarized in Table II for the analysis times of 1 day, 21 days and 4 months for each of the two ripening conditions employed. Notably, the cheese made with only encapsulated buffer did not contain methanethiol after 1 day at either temperature. However, the encapsulated methioninase system yielded significant amounts of methanethiol at 1 day, and continued to increase through 4 months. Generally, the final concentration of methanethiol in the encapsulated-buffer control... [Pg.300]


See other pages where Buffers control is mentioned: [Pg.501]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.1119]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.112]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.455 ]




SEARCH



Controlled buffer

© 2024 chempedia.info