Control of danger

Health, Safety and Welfare in Connection with Work, and Control of Dangerous Substances and Certain Emissions into the Atmosphere, U.K. Parliament, U.K., July 31, 1974, Chapt. 37. 

Hale, A. R., Glendon, A. I. (1987). Individual Behavior in the Control of Danger. Amsterdam Elsevier. 

The control of dangerous reactions to components in foods is not as widely conducted as is the monitoring of side effects caused by pharmaceuticals. This problem results mainly from the complexity of food matrices, and from the limited possibilities for attributing specific effects to particular food components. 

This decision established a firm constitutional basis for federal requirements being imposed on the distribution of drugs and upheld the Harrison Narcotic Act of 1914, which would be the main instrument for federal control of dangerous drugs until the passage of the Controlled Substances Act in 1970. (Congress would also use its taxation power to control drugs in the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937.)... 

The Department of Health, Education, and Welfare s Bureau of Drug Abuse Control was responsible for the control of dangerous drugs, including depressants, stimulants, and hallucinogens, such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). 

Hale, A. R. and Clendon, A. I., Individual Behaviour in the Control of Danger, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1987). This chapter is in great part a summary of the material covered there in great detail. It also contains detailed references for still deeper reading. 

Safety of Buildings Building Control Regulations in respect of new buildings. Control of dangerous structures under Public Health Act. 

Hale, A.R. and Glendon, A.I., Individual Behaviour in the Control of Danger. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1987)... 

Part 1 covers health, safety and welfare in connection with work and the control of dangerous substances and emissions into the atmosphere Part 2 covers the Employment Medical Advisory Service (EMAS)... 

ISO 26262 scales the severity of harm according to the potential injuries of passengers or other people in the area of danger. This means that the intensity or also the characteristic of malfunctions is correlates with the severity of damages. The intensity or other characteristics of malfunctions also influences other factors for the hazard and risk analyses the controllability of dangerous situations. The term controllability was chosen because in this context in an automobile this mainly refers to the driver. However ISO 26262 also considers other people, which could be able to prevent a dangerous simation, for example pedestrians who can still move out of the way of a vehicle that approaches them (Fig. 4.12). 

Control of danger from articles and substances used at work... 

---