Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Control break point

The modulation of synaptosomal plasma membranes (SPMs) by adriamycin and the resultant effects on the activity of membrane-bound enzymes have been reported [58]. Again DPH was used as fluorescence probe. Adriamycin increased the lipid fluidity of the membrane labeled with DPH, as indicated by the steady-state fluorescence anisotropy. The lipid-phase separation of the membrane at 23.3 °C was perturbed by adriamycin so that the transition temperature was reduced to 16.2 °C. At the same time it was found that the Na+,K+-stimulated ATPase activity exhibits a break point at 22.8 °C in control SPMs. This was reduced to 15.8 °C in adriamydn-treated SPMs. It was proposed that adriamycin achieves this effect through asymmetric perturbation of the lipid membrane structure and that this change in the membrane fluidity may be an early key event in adriamycin-induced neurotoxicity. [Pg.76]

In one epidemiological study testing benzene s effects on chromosomal aberrations, benzene appeared to exert a nonrandom effect on chromosomes one, two, four, and nine (Sasiadek et al. 1989). However, this study is limited because relatively few controls were used and all participants (control and exposed) were smokers. The effects of smoking may have confounded the results. In a later paper, extra break points were confirmed on chromosomes 2 and 4, only (Sasiadek and Jagielski 1990). Sister chromatid exchange was not found to be a significant effect of benzene exposure in humans (Seiji et al. 1990 Yardley-Jones et al. 1988) however, poor control selection was used in both studies. Refer to Table 2-5 for a further summary of these results. [Pg.228]

This, in turn, leads to the board weakening. When tested for a break load (3-pt load test) at a span of 3 in. (small pieces of composite boards were weathered and tested), a control, hollow composite board showed a break point at an average load of 3433 + 46 lb. A weathered, crumbled sample of the same size, shown in Figure 15.13, showed a partial break load at 1381 lb (40% of the initial), when the top panel of the hollow board yielded, resulting in large, catastrophic cracks. At continuing load, the bottom panel failed at 1968 lb (57% of the initial). [Pg.532]

Another example can be given with a tongue-and-groove composite hollow board. A control board showed a break point at an average load of 2666 + 32 lb. A weathered, crumbled sample of the same size showed a partial break load at 1408 lb (53%... [Pg.532]

In order to maintain maximum efficiency in recovery, the adsorbers are usually operated on a time cycle. This is adjusted to provide a reasonable factor of safety so that no solvent will be lost at the end of the cycle. Break-point control is used on recycle-cooling systems wherein the air leaving the first adsorber is subsequently passed through a second adsorber thus any vapor of a solvent that comes through the first bed is picked up by the second. This results in a substantial increase in the capacity of the bed and reduces the requirements for steam in the later stage of desorption. [Pg.57]

Consider the following application of fixed-bed, activated carbon adsorption for the control of VOC emissions. An industrial waste gas consists of 0.5 vol% acetone in air at 300 K and 1 atm. It flows at the rate of 2.3 kg/s through a fixed bed packed with activated carbon. The bed has a cross-sectional area of 5.0 m2 and is packed to a depth of 0.3 m. The external porosity of the bed is 40%, its bulk density is 630 kg/m3, and the average particle size is 6 mm. The average pore size of the activated carbon particles is 20 A, the internal porosity is 60%, and the tortuosity factor is 4.0. A Langmuir-type adsorption isotherm applies with qm = 0.378 kg VOC/kg of carbon, K = 0.867 kPa-1. At the break point, the effluent concentration will be 5% of the feed concentration. Calculate ... [Pg.554]

Average Temperature Control Including double differential temperature control. For sharp splits and azeotropic dlstiiiation break points. [Pg.555]

Azeotropic distillation break points. In azeotropic distillation, a relatively sharp temperature break point often occurs. This break point is indicative of the transition from an aqueous environment to an organic environment the entrainer usually persists in the column as far down as this break point. For control purposes, this break point is... [Pg.557]

Bozenhardt (59a) experienced some cycling with his break point position control. He overcame this by introducing a mild and limited two-tray average temperature control within the desired interval. [Pg.558]

Break-point position control can be beneficial for azeotropic distillation. In columns with four products, three composition controls are often better than two. Pressure compensation can improve temperature control. [Pg.683]

Average temperature control can be advantageous near sharp composition break points. In coliunns with four products, two composition controls are often better than one. [Pg.762]

Termonia has proposed a kinetic model for fiber strength [25-27]. His calculations suggest that molecular mass, its distribution, and intermolecular forces control fiber strength. Allen s work linked the failure mode of these fibers with their morphology very closely [16, 28 30]. He was able to show that fiber pleating is responsible for the fact that one needs to consider the asymptotic modulus (modulus close to the fiber breaking point) of these fibers rather than the initial modulus to explain mechanical properties. This interpretation confirmed a clear dependence of fiber strength on both local orientation (as measured by the asymptotic modulus) and secondary interactions (as measured by shear properties). [Pg.984]

Breaking points are the availability of the raw materials and primary containers of reliable suppliers, the feasibility of analysis of the drug substance and the preparation and the availability of equipment. As an example, preparation processes such as tableting, freeze-drying or aseptic production are accessible in a few pharmacies. The preparation of oral solids with controlled release is not possible in pharmacies mainly to lacking equipment (fluidised-bed techniques and instrumental analysis, etc). Working with radiopharmaceuticals also requires very specific facilities, as is the case with preparation of solid dosage forms with hazardous substances. [Pg.48]

Finally, results indicate that there are other factors that control bubble point pressure beyond the fineness of the screen, such as the actual shape of the L/V interface within the pores, the path length that a gas bubble must travel before breaking through the wetted portion of the screen, as well as the geometry of the actual pore formed by the intersection of the wires. Interestingly, results show that there may be an optimal mesh to maximize the bubble point pressure. [Pg.96]

Figure 8.5 plots heated bubble point pressures using Equation (8.1) to normalize the data to the cold gas value obtained at the liquid temperature. Since each controlled break-through/reseal pair occurred at slightly different liquid temperatures from 20.5Kbubble point pressure, as opposed to normalizing to a single value. Therefore, at a temperature difference across the screen of 0 K, there is no deviation from the unheated pressurant gas bubble point ratio, by definition. Data is again plotted as a function of the AT across the screen. Lines are simple linear fits to the data. [Pg.209]

As a general rule, there is an economic break-even point at ca 0.08 mm, which coincides with the defined difference between film and sheet. Film is made mote economically by the bubble method and sheet by the tenter-frame method. The exact thickness for break-even depends on technological improvements, which can be made in both processes, in the degree of control used in regulating them and in quaUty requirements. [Pg.528]

In either equation, /c is given by Eq. (16-84) for parallel pore and surface diffusion or by Eq. (16-85) for a bidispersed particle. For nearly linear isotherms (0.7 < R < 1.5), the same linear addition of resistance can be used as a good approximation to predict the adsorption behavior of packed beds, since solutions for all mechanisms are nearly identical. With a highly favorable isotherm (R 0), however, the rate at each point is controlled by the resistance that is locally greater, and the principle of additivity of resistances breaks down. For approximate calculations with intermediate values of R, an overall transport parameter for use with the LDF approximation can be calculated from the following relationship for sohd diffusion and film resistance in series... [Pg.1516]


See other pages where Control break point is mentioned: [Pg.29]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.683]    [Pg.762]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.64]   


SEARCH



Break point

© 2024 chempedia.info