Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Contrast structures

A simple example serves to illnstrate the similarities between a reaction mechanism with a conventional intermediate and a reaction mechanism with a conical intersection. Consider Scheme 9.2 for the photochemical di-tt-methane rearrangement. Chemical intnition snggests two possible key intermediate structures, II and III. Computations conhrm that, for the singlet photochemical di-Jt-methane rearrangement, structure III is a conical intersection that divides the excited-state branch of the reaction coordinate from the ground state branch. In contrast, structure II is a conventional biradical intermediate for the triplet reaction. [Pg.381]

Hybrids of the type sp3 are unjustified for disilane. An important conclusion from the above hybridization statement No. 4 is concerned with the contrasting structures of the radicals SiH3 and CH3. The planar geometry of the methyl radical can readily be explained by the (bond-strengthening) sp2-hy-bridization, while the pyramidal silyl radical is thought to be stabilized (with respect to the planar arrangement) through the s-admixture to the lone electron orbital. [Pg.84]

Modeling of high-contrast photonic contrast structures... [Pg.73]

In contrast, structure-insensitive reactions are those for which turnover frequency under fixed conditions does not depend or depends slightly on the surface crystalline anisotropy of clusters of varying size or of single crystals exposing different faces. For these kinds of reactions, all accessible surface atoms can be considered as equally active sites (Boudart, 1981 and 1995). [Pg.65]

The structures of selenaaromatic compounds are closely related to those of analogous sulfur compounds. The best known is selenophene (1). As for thiophene, the idea can be offered in terms of resonance theory (Fig. 3). This means that outer valence shell resonance structures la-d may be hybridized into an aromatic sextet. In these cases, selenium acts as an electron acceptor and negative charge is localized on the selenium atom. In contrast, structures le-h have octet formulation not involving valence shell expansion. Selenium acts as electron donor and in these cases positive charge is localized on the selenium atom (Fig. 3). [Pg.289]

As molecules increase in complexity, the number of possibilities for mechanism of action also increase. For example, Structure 17.10 inhibits a specific kinase and specific cellular second messenger.111 In contrast, Structure 17.11 is specifically related to vitamin B2,112 while Structure 17.12, a steroid peroxide,113 is, in the imagination of this author, a molecule likely to impact steroid receptors and enzymes like cytochrome p450s involved in steroid metabolism. However, it is likely that the multiple functions observed for many complex natural products are a result of their interaction with multiple pathways and mechanisms. The environmental fates and... [Pg.552]

The complex formation of PECs and PE-surfs is closely linked to self-assembly processes. A major difference between PECs and PE-surfs can be found in their solid-state structures. PE-surfs show typically highly ordered mesophases in the solid state [15] which is in contrast to the ladder and scrambled-egg structures of PECs [2]. Reasons for the high ordering of PE-surfs are i) cooperative binding phenomena of the surfactant molecules onto the polyelectrolyte chains [16-18] and ii) the amphiphilicity of the surfactant molecules. A further result of the cooperative zipper mechanism between a polyelectrolyte and oppositely charged surfactant molecules is a 1 1 stoichiometry. The amphiphilicity of surfactants favors a microphase separation in PE-surfs that results in periodic nanostructures with repeat units of 1 to 10 nm. By contrast, structures of PECs normally display no such periodic nanostructures. [Pg.115]

Mass spectra of CYMS and CYMD isomers were too similar to allow distinction between their structures. In contrast, structure verification was readily obtained from NMR data. IR spectra as fingerprints for identification of the individual congeners were decisively different from each other [11]. Gas chromatographic separation of congeners was feasible with non-polar capillary columns [11,17-20]. [Pg.4]


See other pages where Contrast structures is mentioned: [Pg.472]    [Pg.659]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.1203]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.972]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.972]    [Pg.265]   


SEARCH



Classification of some important defect structures and diffraction contrast in catalysis

Contrast media chemical structures

Contrast structures boundary conditions

Contrast structures critical case

Contrast structures overview

Contrast structures partial differential equations

Contrast structures phase plane cell

Contrast structures phase transition models

Contrast structures second-order equations

Contrast structures solution stability

Contrast structures spike-type solutions

Contrast structures step-type solutions

Interior layers contrast structures

Spike-type contrast structures

Step-type contrast structures

Step-type contrast structures layers

Structure factor contrast

Structure of Particles Contrast Variation

© 2024 chempedia.info