Contrast structures second-order equation

Sub-glass transitions are generally determined by the molecular (local) scale structure. Their location in the (t, T) space undergoes only a second-order influence of the macromolecular (network) structure through internal antiplasticization effects. By contrast, glass transition is directly under the influence of the network structure (Chapter 10), so that it appears interesting to study the influence of crosslinking on the parameters of the time-temperature relationship (WLF equation) ... 

Tc. The two power-law exponents are not independent but depend on a single parameter, the so-called critical exponent X, which is specific for a given interaction potential (e.g., hard spheres). Actually, the interaction potential enters the MCT equations only indirectly via the structure factor S(q), which fixes the nonlinear coupling in the generalized oscillator equation. It is important to note that the MCT exponents are not universal in contrast to those of second-order phase transitions. In the case of hard spheres, for example, S(q) can be calculated via the Percus-Yevick approximation [26], and the full time and -dependence of < >(q. f) were obtained. As an example, Fig. 10 shows the susceptibility spectra of the hard-sphere system at a particular q. Note that temperature cannot be defined in the hard-sphere system instead, the packing fraction cp is used as a parameter. Above the critical packing fraction 0), which corresponds to T < Tc in systems where T exists, the a-process is absent (frozen) and only the fast dynamics is present. At cp < tpc the a-peak and the concomitant susceptibility minimum shift to lower frequencies with increasing cp, so that the closer cp is to the critical value fast dynamics can be identified (curve c in Fig. 10). 

The general relations among the coefficients - and Dy are presented elsewhere [179]. The quantities yj and y2 are the damping constants for the fundamental and second- harmonic modes, respectively. In Eq.(82) we shall restrict ourselves to the case of zero-frequency mismatch between the cavity and the external forces (ff>i — ff> = 0). In this way we exclude the rapidly oscillating terms. Moreover, the time x and the external amplitude have been redefined as follows x = Kf and 8F =. The s ordering in Eq.(80) which is responsible for the operator structure of the Hamiltonian allows us to contrast the classical and quantum dynamics of our system. If the Hamiltonian (77)-(79) is classical (i.e., if it is a c number), then the equation for the probability density has the form of Eq.(80) without the s terms ... 

The second common type of operationally defined structure is the so-called substitution or rt structure.10 The structural parameter is said to be an rs parameter whenever it has been obtained from Cartesian coordinates calculated from changes in moments of inertia that occur on isotopic substitution at the atoms involved by using Kraitchman s equations.9 In contrast to r0 structures, rs structures are very nearly isotopically consistent. Nonetheless, isotope effects can cause difficulties as discussed by Schwendeman. Watson12 has recently shown that to first-order in perturbation theory a moment of inertia calculated entirely from substitution coordinates is approximately the average of the effective and equilibrium moments of inertia. However, this relation does not extend to the structural parameters themselves, except for a diatomic molecule or a very few special cases of polyatomics. In fact, one drawback of rs structures is their lack of a well-defined relation to other types of structural parameters in spite of the well-defined way in which they are determined. It is occasionally stated in the literature that r, parameters approximate re parameters, but this cannot be true in general. For example, for a linear molecule Watson12 has shown that to first order ... 

---