Constitutive equations Newtonian model

Material parameters defined by Equations (1.11) and (1.12) arise from anisotropy (i.e. direction dependency) of the microstructure of long-chain polymers subjected to liigh shear deformations. Generalized Newtonian constitutive equations cannot predict any normal stress acting along the direction perpendicular to the shearing surface in a viscometric flow. Thus the primary and secondary normal stress coefficients are only used in conjunction with viscoelastic constitutive models. 

A frequently used example of Oldroyd-type constitutive equations is the Oldroyd-B model. The Oldroyd-B model can be thought of as a description of the constitutive behaviour of a fluid made by the dissolution of a (UCM) fluid in a Newtonian solvent . Here, the parameter A, called the retardation time is de.fined as A = A (r s/(ri + s), where 7]s is the viscosity of the solvent. Hence the extra stress tensor in the Oldroyd-B model is made up of Maxwell and solvent contributions. The Oldroyd-B constitutive equation is written as... 

As already discussed, in general, polymer flow models consist of the equations of continuity, motion, constitutive and energy. The constitutive equation in generalized Newtonian models is incorporated into the equation of motion and only in the modelling of viscoelastic flows is a separate scheme for its solution reqixired. 

In generalized Newtonian fluids, before derivation of the final set of the working equations, the extra stress in the expanded equations should be replaced using the components of the rate of strain tensor (note that the viscosity should also be normalized as fj = rj/p). In contrast, in the modelling of viscoelastic fluids, stress components are found at a separate step through the solution of a constitutive equation. This allows the development of a robust Taylor Galerkin/ U-V-P scheme on the basis of the described procedure in which the stress components are all found at time level n. The final working equation of this scheme can be expressed as... 

In order to overcome the shortcomings of the power-law model, several alternative forms of equation between shear rate and shear stress have been proposed. These are all more complex involving three or more parameters. Reference should be made to specialist works on non-Newtonian flow 14-171 for details of these Constitutive Equations. 

Boussinesq (B4) proposed that the lack of internal circulation in bubbles and drops is due to an interfacial monolayer which acts as a viscous membrane. A constitutive equation involving two parameters, surface shear viscosity and surface dilational viscosity, in addition to surface tension, was proposed for the interface. This model, commonly called the Newtonian surface fluid model (W2), has been extended by Scriven (S3). Boussinesq obtained an exact solution to the creeping flow equations, analogous to the Hadamard-Rybczinski result but with surface viscosity included. The resulting terminal velocity is... 

The simplest generalized Newtonian constitutive equation is the power law model that assumes the viscosity has the following dependence on shear rate,... 

Using a Maxwell model as a constitutive equation for a viscoelastic fluid, one can show that the instantaneous shear stress at the wall is smaller in the viscoelastic fluid than in the corresponding Newtonian fluid. 

The behavior of a non-Newtonian viscoelastic fluid can be described by a constitutive equation which takes into account condition (1). Rheological behavior of the fluid is described by an equation derived from White-Metzner-Litvinov model and takes the following form 27,321 ... 

In this case, p is an arbitrary constant, chosen as the zero shear rate viscosity. The expression for the non-Newtonian viscosity is a constitutive equation for a generalized Newtonian fluid, like the power law or Ostwald-de-Waele model [6]... 

Viscoelastic constitutive equations are used to model material properties. Viscoelastic theory combines the elements of elasticity and Newtonian fluids. The theory of viscoelasticity was developed to describe the behavior of materials which show intermediate behavior between solids and fluids. 

In fact, Equation 5.281 describes an interface as a two-dimensional Newtonian fluid. On the other hand, a number of non-Newtonian interfacial rheological models have been described in the literature. Tambe and Sharma modeled the hydrodynamics of thin liquid films bounded by viscoelastic interfaces, which obey a generalized Maxwell model for the interfacial stress tensor. These authors also presented a constitutive equation to describe the rheological properties of fluid interfaces containing colloidal particles. A new constitutive equation for the total stress was proposed by Horozov et al. ° and Danov et al. who applied a local approach to the interfacial dilatation of adsorption layers. 

As discussed earlier, LADDs are complex, multicomponent mixtures consisting of both organic and inorganic compounds dispersed in a liquid matrix. Such compositions can exhibit a broad range of rheological characteristics from simple Newtonian to complex pseudoplastic flow. Shown in Figure 9.6 and Figure 9.7 are flow and viscosity profiles of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids as a function of applied shear rate. A number of mathematical models have been proposed [76] to describe the flow characteristics of various systems. These equations are called constitutive equations and are used to predict flow behavior in complex systems. 

Fluids for which this constitutive equation is an adequate model are known as Newtonian fluids. We have shown that the Newtonian fluid model is the most general form that is linear and instantaneous in E and isotropic. If the fluid is also incompressible,... 

The definition (2 85) is a purely mechanical definition of pressure for a moving fluid, and nothing is implied directly of the connection for a moving fluid between p and the ordinary static or thermodynamic pressure p. Although the connection between p and p can always be stated once the constitutive equation for T is given, one would not necessarily expect the relationship to be simple for all fluids because thermodynamics refers to equilibrium conditions, whereas the elements of a fluid in motion are clearly not in thermodynamic equilibrium. Applying the definition (2-85) to the general Newtonian constitutive model, (2-80), we find... 

Given the apparent arbitrariness of the assumptions in a purely continuum-mechanics-based theory and the desire to obtain results that apply to at least some real fluids, there has been a historical tendency to either relax the Newtonian fluid assumptions one at a time (for example, to seek a constitutive equation that allows quadratic as well as linear dependence on strain rate, but to retain the other assumptions) or to make assumptions of such generality that they must apply to some real materials (for example, we might suppose that stress is a functional over past times of the strain rate, but without specifying any particular form). The former approach tends to produce very specific and reasonable-appearing constitutive models that, unfortunately, do not appear to correspond to any real fluids. The best-known example is the so-called Stokesian fluid. If it is assumed that the stress is a nonlinear function of the strain rate E, but otherwise satisfies the Newtonian fluid assumptions of isotropy and dependence on E only at the same point and at the same moment in time, it can be shown (see, e.g., Leigh29) that the most general form allowed for the constitutive model is... 

Experimental data for polymer solutions have been reported by Osaki, Tamura, Kurata, and Kotaka (60), by Booij (12), and by Macdonald (50). Osaki et al. used polystyrene in toluene, polymethylmethacrylate in diethylphthalate, and poly-n-butylmethacrylate in diethylphthalate. Booij s data were for aluminum dilaurate in decalin and a rubbery ethylene-propylene copolymer in decalin. Macdonald s experiments were performed on several polystyrenes in several Aroclors and on polyisobutylene in Primol. Shortly after the original publication of the Japanese group, Macdonald and Bird (51) showed that a nonlinear viscoelastic constitutive equation was capable of describing quantitatively their data on both the non-Newtonian viscosity and the superposed-flow material functions. Other measurements and continuum model calculations have been described by Booij (12 a). 

Duct flows of nonnewtonian fluids are described by the governing equations (Eq. 10.24-10.26), by the constitutive equation (Eq. 10.27) with the viscosity defined by one of the models in Table 10.1, or by a linear or nonlinear viscoelastic constitutive equation. To compare the available analytical and experimental results, it is necessary to nondimensionalize the governing equations and the constitutive equations. In the case of newtonian flows, a uniquely defined nondimensional parameter, the Reynolds number, is found. However, a comparable nondimensional parameter for nonnewtonian flow is not uniquely defined because of the different choice of the characteristic viscosity. 

The theoretical treatment of such non-Newtonian behavior has been through the development of constitutive equations to replace the Newtonian relationship between stress and strain rate, and to be used in continuum mechanical treatments of real flows. The constitutive equation has often been largely empirical in origin (like, for example, power law fluids), but increasingly has been derived from molecular theories, where macromolecules are modeled as bead-spring, bead-rod, or finitely extendable dumbbells. 

---