Consent levels

There is a vast range of aqueous organic pollutants with a wide toxicity profile. Some, e.g. polychlorinated biphenyls, certain herbicides, fungicides and pesticides, and organo-mercury compounds, are persistent and may bioaccumulate in the food chain. Trace contaminants such as sodium chloride, iron and phenols (especially if chlorinated) may also impart a taste to water. Typical consent levels for industrial discharges are provided in Table 13.10. 

Consent levels and Safety, Health and Environmental criteria... 

Section 8 - Consent Levels and Health, Safety and Environmental Protection Criteria. This section lists the maximum levels for emissions to the environment, chemical concentrations in the working environment, noise, health effects and personal risk. These may be imposed by statute or the result of Company policies. These figures will have a direct effect on the design of various items of plant equipment. 

Commercial quick- and hydrated limes are suitable for the treatment of waste water. In some situations, due consideration will need to be given to the permissible levels of trace elements in the lime, in the context of consent levels for discharges to water courses. 

Service non-conformances Discharges above consent levels work Injuries during travel Injuries at home Injuries arising from unsafe products Sensitisation Interruptions to production Damage arising from unsafe products Losses from theft and vandalism... 

Local authorities are empowered by the Control of Pollution Act 1974 to designate areas as noise-abatement zones. Within these areas noise levels are measured and entered into a register. It is an offence to increase noise levels beyond register levels unless consent is obtained. If the local authorities are of the opinion that existing noise levels are too high, noise-reduction notices can be served. 

What is an engineering standard Webster s New International Dictionary contains the following definition Standard That which is established by authority, custom, or general consent, as a model or example, criteria, text. In general, a definitive level, degree, material, character, quality, or the like, viewed as that which is proper and adequate for a given purpose. 

This determination requires an examination of both an old and a new line of cases. In the new line of cases, plaintiffs have argued—in the therapeutic context—that health care providers have a duty to provide comparative data about the effectiveness not only of various treatment alternatives, but also about the qualifications, competence, and experience of the provider. In the one case in which plaintiffs have so far succeeded in surviving a motion to dismiss, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that a neurosurgeon had a duty to disclose his level of experience with a procedure and the morbidity and mortality differences between himself and more experienced neurosurgeons (Johnson v. Kokemoor, 1996). The Wisconsin court s ruling has been labeled the "second revolution" of the informed consent doctrine (Twerski and Cohen, 1999 Ketler, 2001). 

Meanwhile, members of the Medical and Related Problems Committee of the Chemical Corps Advisory Council were busy creating some of their own rules. They separated hazardous from non-hazardous experiments so that only the latter would require higher-level approval. They sought blanket approval for experiments already in progress, hoping to avoid unnecessary red tape. The Council made informed consent essential, however, and demanded sufficient evidence be made available to show that the soldier was tmly able to freely volunteer. 

The study was performed in patients exposed to ionizing radiation after Chernobyl accident. Comparison groups included patients and healthy individuals exposed to the natural radiation levels. Control group included healthy volunteers who resided in Kyiv since Chernobyl accident Distribution by diagnosis is presented at table 1. Investigated persons were at the age of 43-72 (mean+SD for the exposed group 52,3 + 10,1 yrs for control group- 46,3 + 11,3 yrs). All studied persons participated by informed consent. Peripheral blood and bone marrow samples were obtained by a standard procedure (National. Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 1991). Flow... 

Consent decrees may specify hardware or additive solutions for individual applications. When a refiner agrees to implement a hardware solution, emissions limits are typically specified in the Consent Decree. This requires the refiner to design and implement an appropriately sized unit to meet these limits. With FCC additive solutions or hybrid solutions combining hardware and additives (such as a hydrotreater and SOj reduction additive), final emissions limits are not generally defined in the Consent Decree. Instead, a testing and demonstration program is defined to determine the performance of the additive(s) in the FCC unit at optimized concentrations. This may also be the case for some hardware solutions. The process to determine the optimized additive rate and process conditions is also identified. A baseline period and model is often used to determine additive effectiveness. A series of kick-out factors based upon additive performance are evaluated to determine the optimized level... 

Consideration of the use of medications in children requires a careful discussion with the child and the child s family of the risks and benefits potentially associated with the treatment. The AACAP Practice Parameters address the issue of informed consent, and how children, parents, and clinicians might reach a consensus on the use of medications (King, 1997). Children should have the opportunity to assent to the use of medications at a developmentally appropriate level. In general, pharmacotherapy should not be used as the sole intervention for a child s disorder but should be integrated into a comprehensive treatment plan. 

---