Configuration interaction terms

Among the most widely used ab initio methods are those referred to as Gl" and 02." These methods incorporate large basis sets including d and / orbitals, called 6-311. The calculations also have extensive configuration interaction terms at the Moller-Plesset fourth order (MP4) and fiirther terms referred to as quadratic configuration interaction (QCISD). ° Finally, there are systematically applied correction terms calibrated by exact energies from small molecules. 

Model Hartree-Fock calculations which include only the electrostatic interaction in terms of the Slater integrals F0, F2, F and F6, and the spin-orbit interaction , result in differences between calculated and experimentally observed levels596 which can be more than 500 cm-1 even for the f2 ion Pr3. However, inclusion of configuration interaction terms, either two-particle or three-particle, considerably improves the correlations.597,598 In this way, an ion such as Nd3+ can be described in terms of 18 parameters (including crystal field... 

Fig. 1 Depiction of the SOCI Hamiltonian matrix for the RuO " MRS calculation. This plot indicates the number of nonzero doublegroup configuration interaction terms (height) versus the specified configuration pair (base). The total number of spatial configuration is 607,965, and the total double-group symmetry-adapted function is 6,078,210. The four J symmetries (1, 3, 5, 7) that mix for this problem are evident in the block nature of the block nature...

The simplest many-electron wave function that satisfies the Exclusion Principle is a product of N different one-electron functions that have been antisymmetrized, or written as a determinant. Here, N is the number of electrons (or valence electrons) in the molecule. HyperChem uses this form of the wave function for most semi-empirical and ab initio calculations. Exceptions involve using the Configuration Interaction option (see page 119). HyperChem computes one-electron functions, termed molecular spin orbitals, by relatively simple integration and summation calculations. The many-electron wave function, which has N terms (the number of terms in the determinant), never needs to be evaluated. 

If a covalent bond is broken, as in the simple case of dissociation of the hydrogen molecule into atoms, then theRHFwave function without the Configuration Interaction option (see Extending the Wave Function Calculation on page 37) is inappropriate. This is because the doubly occupied RHFmolecular orbital includes spurious terms that place both electrons on the same hydrogen atom, even when they are separated by an infinite distance. 

A disadvantage of all these limited Cl variants is that they are not size-consistent.The Quadratic Configuration Interaction (QCI) method was developed to correct this deficiency. The QCISD method adds terms to CISD to restore size consistency. QCISD also accounts for some correlation effects to infinite order. QCISD(T) adds triple substitutions to QCISD, providing even greater accuracy. Similarly, QCISD(TQ) adds both triples and quadruples from the full Cl expansion to QCISD. 

There are three main methods for calculating electron correlation Configuration Interaction (Cl), Many Body Perturbation Theory (MBPT) and Coupled Cluster (CC). A word of caution before we describe these methods in more details. The Slater determinants are composed of spin-MOs, but since the Hamilton operator is independent of spin, the spin dependence can be factored out. Furthermore, to facilitate notation, it is often assumed that the HF determinant is of the RHF type. Finally, many of the expressions below involve double summations over identical sets of functions. To ensure only the unique terms are included, one of the summation indices must be restricted. Alternatively, both indices can be allowed to run over all values, and the overcounting corrected by a factor of 1/2. Various combinations of these assumptions result in final expressions which differ by factors of 1 /2, 1/4 etc. from those given here. In the present book the MOs are always spin-MOs, and conversion of a restricted summation to an unrestricted is always noted explicitly. 

Green, L. C., Mulder, M. M., Milner, P. C., Lewis, M. N., Woll, J. W., Jr., Kolchin, E. K., and Mace, D., Phys. Rev. 96, 319, (iii) Analysis of the three parameter wave function of Hylleraas for the He I ground state in terms of central field wave-functions/ Configurational interaction. 

The metric term Eq. (2.8) is important for all cases in which the manifold M has non-zero curvature and is thus nonlinear, e.g. in the cases of Time-Dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) and Time-Dependent Multi-Configurational Self-Consistent Field (TDMCSCF) c culations. In such situations the metric tensor varies from point to point and has a nontrivial effect on the time evolution. It plays the role of a time-dependent force (somewhat like the location-dependent gravitational force which arises in general relativity from the curvature of space-time). In the case of flat i.e. linear manifolds, as are found in Time-Dependent Configuration Interaction (TDCI) calculations, the metric is constant and does not have a significant effect on the dynamics. 

The asymptotic energy values obtained by a configuration interaction calculation at 25 a.u. corrected by the coulombic repulsion term (the l/R" term has been neglected) are seen to be in quite good agreement with experiment (Table 3). 

A description as a MMCT transition is not very obvious for this case. However, there is no essential difference between the physical origin of the colors of Pb(N02)2 and, for example, CU2WO4. Unfortunately the literature shows sometimes discussions on the nature of their excited states in terms of either MMCT or metal-ion-induced CT transitions. To us, such a discussion does not seem to be very fruitful. In the classification it is a matter of taste which nomenclature is used, in the (more difficult) characterization it is essential to determine the coefficients which indicate the amount of configuration interaction. The latter describe the nature of the excited state. 

We can now consider explicitly how configurations interact to produce electronic states. Our first task is to define the Hamiltonian operator. In order to simplify our analysis, we adopt a Hamiltonian which consists of only one electron terms and we set out to develop electronic states which arise from one electron configuration mixing. 

The primary piece of information obtained from most theoretical calculations is the molecular structure. If homoaromatic interactions are important in a molecule, they may cause the molecule to adopt an unusual geometry. In suitable radicals, ESR evidence has been taken to indicate systems of high symmetry which in turn has been interpreted in terms of homoaromatic interactions (Dai et al., 1990). A computational example of this effect is shown in the semiempirical calculations of Williams and Kurtz (1988) on the bisannelated semibullvalene [108]. Here simple configuration interaction... 

V, is the molar volume of polymer or solvent, as appropriate, and the concentration is in mass per unit volume. It can be seen from Equation (2.42) that the interaction term changes with the square of the polymer concentration but more importantly for our discussion is the implications of the value of x- When x = 0.5 we are left with the van t Hoff expression which describes the osmotic pressure of an ideal polymer solution. A sol vent/temperature condition that yields this result is known as the 0-condition. For example, the 0-temperature for poly(styrene) in cyclohexane is 311.5 K. At this temperature, the poly(styrene) molecule is at its closest to a random coil configuration because its conformation is unperturbed by specific solvent effects. If x is greater than 0.5 we have a poor solvent for our polymer and the coil will collapse. At x values less than 0.5 we have the polymer in a good solvent and the conformation will be expanded in order to pack as many solvent molecules around each chain segment as possible. A 0-condition is often used when determining the molecular weight of a polymer by measurement of the concentration dependence of viscosity, for example, but solution polymers are invariably used in better than 0-conditions. 

---