Conducting polymers conventional metals

Conventional redox polymers can also form the basis of electrochemical transistors. Conventional redox polymers have lower maximum conductivity/ and yield devices having lower values of Ijy than conducting polymers or metal oxides. Conventional redox polymers offer an important design advantage, however. Nearly any stable redox active material can be incorporated into a polymeric system to form a conventional redox polymer. This allows the fabrication of devices with a wide range of chemical sensitivities. 

From the beginning of their history in the late 1970s, conductive polymers (organic metals) have been considered as intractable and insoluble. It was an important goal in basic research as in application-oriented materials science to develop techniques by which they could be processed. The use of solvents was one of the options. As early as 1983-84, after five years of research, we happened to create the first clear dispersions of polyacetylene, polypyrrole, and polyaniline [42], with and without the presence of conventional polymeric binders. This was the beginning of nanotechnology with organic metals. 

These supercapacitors use modified conventional textile material as the base material and then thin active layers of electrodes and electrolyte are applied on it. The textile fabric can also be used as the main active components of the supercapacitor, say the electrode or the separator or the holder of the active elements. If the textile material is used as the base, it is normally modified by adding conductive polymers or metal particles to it by various techniques (coating, printing, deposition, dispersion, or on-site polymerization of conductive polymer). 

The effect of these impacts can be greatly reduced if Pt is recovered and reused, as all heavy metals should be. A strategy for supply of Pt to the fuel cell industry is discussed by Jaffray and Hards (2003). In terms of weight, the stack breakdown on components is shown in Fig. 6.6 for two conventional material choices for the bipolar plates, graphite or aluminium. Recently, bipolar plates made of conducting polymers have been developed (Middleman et al., 2003), with thickness and weight reduction as a consequence. 

Organic polymers that possess the electronic, magnetic, and optical properties of metals are known as conductive polymers (CPs). Because of their conjugated u electron backbones, they can be oxidized or reduced more easily and more reversibly than conventional polymers with charge-transfer agents, also commonly called dopants, a term borrowed from condensed matter physics. While retaining some of the mechanical properties of polymers, they do not melt or dissolve in common organic solvents, a major impediment to their widespread commercialization in the same manner as traditional plastics. The same electronic structure that confers electrical conductivity to these polymers also contributes to their intractability and instability. 

The diffraction equipment used for the study of conducting polymers in no way differs fi-om that used for the study of conventional polymers. This short section does not cover the experimental methods in any technical detail, however, but merely presents some considerations about their applicability. Details can be found in the standard books on this topic [3-5]. Admittedly, these books are somewhat dated they do not, for instance, reflect the impact of computers on both automation of equipment and data evaluation. Another result of the ever-accelerating progress in microelectronics (still based on metals and inorganic semiconductors instead of polymers), is to be found in the field of x-ray detector systems linear photodiode array detectors, Charge-Coupled-Device area detectors and Image Plate detectors have all become available recently. 

As the nature of the electrified interface dominates the kinetics of corrosive reactions, it is most desirable to measure, e.g., the drop in electrical potential across the interface, even where the interface is buried beneath a polymer layer and is therefore not accessible for conventional electrochemical techniques. The scanning Kelvin probe (SKP), which measures in principle the Volta potential difference (or contact potential difference) between the sample and a sensing probe (which may consist of a sharp wire composed of a conducting, stable phase such as graphite or gold) by the vibrating condenser method, is the only technique which allows the measurement of such data and therefore aU modern models which deal with electrochemical de-adhesion reactions are based on such techniques [1-8]. Recently, it has been apphed mainly for the measurement of electrode potentials at polymer/metal interfaces, especially polymer-coated metals such as iron, zinc, and aluminum alloys [9-15]. The principal features of a scanning Kelvin probe for corrosion studies are shown in Fig. 31.1. 

One application brings the conducting polymer as a dispersion coating to the surface [66]. A powder of polyaniline (with a particle size in the range of some tens of nanometers) is dispersed in a conventional paint, and this is painted onto the metal surface. The authors use a very low powder concentration of 4% and explain the corrosion-protection properties with a percolation model. 

There is growing interest in biomimetic motions, which imitate the action of natural muscles. Since such motions are difficult to realize using conventional appliances such as mechanical, hydraulic, or pneumatic actuators, research efforts are focused on the development of new muscle-like actuators. Electroactive polymers (EAPs) including polymer gels [63], ionic polymer-metal composites (IMPCs) [64], conductive polymers [56], and carbon nanotubes [65] are candidates to address the performance demands. 

With PPy as the substrate, Yan ef al. noticed interesting GMR behavior with a value of 4% in cobalt and copper multilayers, as shown in Figure 12.14 [65]. The copper layer serves as a spacer for cobalt layers, similar to a conventional metal electrode system. However, there is no report regarding conductive polymer layers as ferromagnetic layer spacers. The reported value is lower than that of the pure metal system. There were three proposed reasons for the difference the quality of the cobalt layer (with more copper in the ferromagnetic cobalt layers with a PPy substrate) the roughness of the PPy thin film (rougher compared than conventional metal) and the low conductivity of the PPy film used. 

---