Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Concentrations versus stream

Benzene chemisorption on platinum-alumina in the range 26°-470°C has been measured in a flow system by Pitkethly and Goble (7). A small dose of benzene was injected into a stream of inert carrier gas and transported to the reactor the effluent was then sampled repeatedly and analyzed by gas-liquid chromatography. Information concerning the adsorption and desorption of benzene was obtained from the shape of the subsequent benzene concentration versus time curves. Evidence was obtained for four types of adsorption of benzene ... [Pg.124]

While microscopic techniques like PFG NMR and QENS measure diffusion paths that are no longer than dimensions of individual crystallites, macroscopic measurements like zero length column (ZLC) and Fourrier Transform infrared (FTIR) cover beds of zeolite crystals [18, 23]. In the case of the popular ZLC technique, desorption rate is measured from a small sample (thin layer, placed between two porous sinter discs) of previously equilibrated adsorbent subjected to a step change in the partial pressure of the sorbate. The slope of the semi-log plot of sorbate concentration versus time under an inert carrier stream then gives D/R. Provided micropore resistance dominates all other mass transfer resistances, D becomes equal to intracrystalline diffusivity while R is the crystal radius. It has been reported that the presence of other mass transfer resistances have been the most common cause of the discrepancies among intracrystaUine diffusivities measured by various techniques [18]. [Pg.419]

It is often impossible to determine experimentally the cell concentration in immo-bilized-cell reactors. However, it is usually very easy to measure oxygen and metabolite concentrations in the inlet and outlet streams. From the metabolite concentration versus time data, a volumetric (per unit reactor volume rather than per cell) production rate can be determined ... [Pg.155]

Mixing in a stream or river can be quantitatively illustrated by instantaneously releasing a mass of chemical uniformly throughout the cross section of a channel this pulse injection is best expressed as mass per cross section of river, [M/L2]. Ideally, one chooses a conservative tracer (i.e., a chemical that does not undergo degradation in the river and is not absorbed to the river channel or suspended particles). The lower panel of Fig. 2-4 shows a chemical concentration in a stream at several different times after a pulse injection. At any instant, the plot of concentration versus distance is bell-shaped ideally, if the mixing is truly Fickian, the curve has the shape of a Gaussian, or normal, curve,... [Pg.75]

In section 4.5, the following designations are made Qi, Qij and qij are the mass flow rates of the particles stream (kg particles/sec) and Cj is the concentration of the tracer particles (kg tracer particles/kg particles). In such systems, the tracer particles are, usually, those of the original ones. They are, however, made radioactive or are painted, in order to distinguish them from the original particles. The latter makes it possible to determine their concentration versus time in the RTD experiments [73, p.l76], thus their mean residence time tm in the system. tm =... [Pg.463]

When strongly correlated and reproducible, concentration versus discharge plots can be used to predict stream flow from stream chemistry and conversely. The plots also suggest that the heavy metal load of a given stream may be predictable from its specific conductance or discharge. When identified, such relationships can be useful for the monitoring and management of surface-water quality. [Pg.304]

The deviation of a real (continuously operated) reactor from ideal systems is deduced from the residence time distribution (RTD), which is measured by a pulse or by a step experiment. For a pulse experiment, a small amount of tracer is introduced into the feed stream, and the exit tracer concentration is measured with time ( function). For a step experiment, at time t = 0 we switch to a fluid with a tracer of constant concentration, and the exit tracer concentration versus time is measured (Ffunction). [Pg.378]

Examples of the modeling results at different experimental temperatures are presented in Fig. 9.13. A very good model fit to the experimental data was obtained, while kinetic models based on a pseudo-steady-state on the catalyst surface fail to describe the present system. The concentration versus the time-on-stream behavior is correctly predicted by the model, including the consumption of the reactant (A) as well as the formation of the two-product enantiomers (B and C). Consequendy, the model is able to describe the enantiomeric excess as a function of time-on-stream and provides valuable information about the behavior of complex organic reactions systems. The approach presented here is applicable to any catalytic three-phase system operated under transient conditions. [Pg.518]

The performance data for plug versus mix reactor were obtained. The data were collected as the inverse of qx vs inverse of substrate concentration. Table E.1.1 shows the data based on obtained kinetic data. From the data plotted in Figure E.1.1, we can minimise the volume of the chemostat. A CSTR works better than a plug flow reactor for the production of biomass. Maximum qx is obtained with a substrate concentration in the leaving stream of 12g m 3. [Pg.300]

Hence the area under the curve of y versus CA multiplied by the ratio of stoichiometric coefficients represents the overall change in valuable product concentration between the inlet and outlet streams in a plug flow reactor or in a batch reactor. For the case of a CSTR the instantaneous yield is evaluated at the effluent composition, and the corresponding equation is... [Pg.321]

The steady state material and energy balances for the evaporator are listed in Table VI and VII, and the notation in Table VIII. Table IX lists the enthalpy relationships for the various streams as well as the boiling point versus pressure and concentration relationships in functional form for NaOH solutions and pure water. The list of unknown variables and the numbers assigned to each is given in Table X. At this stage in the analysis there are 25 equations and 27 unknown variables. Another pair of equations comes from the problem statement in which the following is given... [Pg.230]

Recently, Fuchs etal. [15], using the streaming mercury electrode and applying the Henderson equation, have determined the pzc value in the solutions of tetraethy-lammonium perchlorate in DMSO as —0.515 0.001 V (versus Ag/0.01 M Ag+ (DMSO) reference electrode). This value was corrected for the liquid junction potential and was independent of tetraethyl ammonium perchlorate (TEAR) concentration within the range 0.02 to 0.75 M. Using the same methodology, KiSova et al. [Pg.962]

Figure 6.8 shows the l/rx versus Cx curve. The shaded rectangular area in the figure is equal to the residence time in a CSTF when the inlet stream is sterile. This graphical illustration of the residence time can aid us in comparing the effectiveness of fermenter systems. The shorter the residence time in reaching a certain cell concentration, the more effective the fermenter. The optimum operation of fermenters based on this graphical illustration is discussed in the next section. [Pg.142]


See other pages where Concentrations versus stream is mentioned: [Pg.136]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.655]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.55]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info