Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Concentration factors, determination

The fatigue evaluation procedure is outlined in Chapter 8 in which it was mentioned how the alternating stress intensity is calculated for the general multiaxial stress state in a pressure vessel component. In addition, the effects of the so-called local structural discontinuities must be evaluated using stress concentration factors determined from theoretical, numerical or numerical techniques. These are referred to as the fatigue strength reduction factors, which generally should not exceed a value of 5. [Pg.167]

A key factor determining the performance of ultrafiltration membranes is concentration polarization due to macromolecules retained at the membrane surface. In ultrafiltration, both solvent and macromolecules are carried to the membrane surface by the solution permeating the membrane. Because only the solvent and small solutes permeate the membrane, macromolecular solutes accumulate at the membrane surface. The rate at which the rejected macromolecules can diffuse away from the membrane surface into the bulk solution is relatively low. This means that the concentration of macromolecules at the surface can increase to the point that a gel layer of rejected macromolecules forms on the membrane surface, becoming a secondary barrier to flow through the membrane. In most ultrafiltration appHcations this secondary barrier is the principal resistance to flow through the membrane and dominates the membrane performance. [Pg.78]

The dissolved oxygen concentrations are determined immediately and after five days. The method for dissolved measurement involves either a modified Winkler titration or a membrane-covered oxygen electrode. The difference between initial and final dissolved oxygen multiphed by the dilution factor is the BOD value. [Pg.232]

The optimal conditions for accelerating of investigated reaction by ions Fe(III) and Ag(I) ai e the following pH 5,0 (acetic buffer), Cj. . =l,6T0 M, CpMSA=4T0 M, Cpp =2-10 M. Under these conditions, factors of sensitivity for kinetic determination of metals mentioned above were established as a slope s tangent of the calibration curves that is a plot of reaction velocity (change of optical density of ferroin s solution for 4 minutes) versus analyte s concentration. Factors of sensitivity for determination of Mn(II), Fe(III), Ag(I), Pd(II), Co(II) ai-e 5,5-10" 1,1-10" 2,5-10" 2,0-10" 8,0-10", respectively. [Pg.61]

First procedure consists of several stages. 11-molybdo-bismuthphosphate (MBP) is formed and extracted with butyl acetate, stripped with ammonia or acetate buffer solution and determined in aqueous solution using reaction of MBP with Astro Floxine (AF) or other polymethine dyes. Full separation from molybdate excess is not necessary in this procedure as spectiaim of lA differs considerable from dye spectiaim. Therefore sepai ation is simplified and used only as preconcentration step. Concentration factor 50 and good reproducibility make possible determination of low P(V) concentrations at 10 mol/1 level and lower. [Pg.125]

The possibility of preconcentration of selenium in form of SeO by evaporation of low alkali water solution (for 20-1000 J.g/L) has been investigated. Considerable losses of selenium have been observed during evaporation of acidic and neutral solutions owing to volatility of selenium compounds. During evaporation of low alkali solutions at ph 9-10 there are no losses of selenium. Relative error of selenium determination is 1-2% for 1000 P-g/L solution and 3-5% for 20-100 p.g/L. Concentration factor is 10. [Pg.293]

The possibility of preconcentration of selenium (IV) by coprecipitation with iron (III) hydroxide and lanthanum (III) hydroxide with subsequent determination by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy has been investigated also. The effect of nature and concentration of collector and interfering ions on precision accuracy and reproducibility of analytical signal A has been studied. Application of FefOH) as copreconcentrant leads to small relative error (less than 5%). S, is 0.1-0.2 for 5-100 p.g Se in the sample. Concentration factor is 6. The effect of concentration of hydrochloric acid on precision and accuracy of AAS determination of Se has been studied. The best results were obtained with HCl (1 1). [Pg.293]

Fracture is caused by higher stresses around flaws or cracks than in the surrounding material. However, fracture mechanics is much more than the study of stress concentration factors. Such factors are useful in determining the influence of relatively large holes in bodies (see Section 6.3, Holes in Laminates), but are not particularly helpful when the body has sharp notches or crack-like flaws. For composite materials, fracture has a new dimension as opposed to homogeneous isotropic materials because of the presence of two or more constituents. Fracture can be a fracture of the individual constituents or a separation of the interface between the constituents. [Pg.339]

Equilibrium (continued) calculations, 192 constant, 151, table, 154 crystallization and, 144 dynamic nature of, 144, 165 effect of catalyst, 148 effect of concentration, 148 of energy, 167 of randomness, 166 of temperature, 67. 148, 167 factors determining, 155, 158 law of chemical, 152, 173 liquid-gas, 66 qualitative aspects of, 142 quantitative aspects of, 151 recognizing, 143 slate of, 142, 147 sugars, 425 thermal, 56... [Pg.459]

Two other major factors determining module selection are concentration polarisation control and resistance to fouling. Concentration polarisation control is a particularly important issue in liquid separations such as reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration. Hollow-fine-fibre modules are notoriously prone to fouling and concentration polarisation and can be used in reverse osmosis applications only when extensive, costly feed solution pretreatment removes all particulates. These fibres cannot be used in ultrafiltration applications at all. [Pg.374]

Sodium dodecyl sulfate is the universal analytical standard for the determination of anionic and cationic active matter. It is used to determine the analytical concentration factor of the cationic surfactant in the titration of anionic active matter and as titrant to determine the cationic active matter. [Pg.273]

For the transport of coarse particles, the relative velocity between the liquid and solids is an important factor determining the hold-up, and hence the in-line concentration of solids. Cloete et a/. 65) who conveyed sand and glass ballotini particles through vertical... [Pg.210]

Fig. 5.3. Now the reaction rate is determined by AGcage and Ag age, but AGcage is almost entirely determined by simple concentration factors. Thus a comparison of Ag age and Agfat allows one to explore fundamental catalytic aspects, including real entropic effects, without preoccupation with the rather trivial effective concentration effect, associated with bringing the reactants to the same cage. Fig. 5.3. Now the reaction rate is determined by AGcage and Ag age, but AGcage is almost entirely determined by simple concentration factors. Thus a comparison of Ag age and Agfat allows one to explore fundamental catalytic aspects, including real entropic effects, without preoccupation with the rather trivial effective concentration effect, associated with bringing the reactants to the same cage.
Rainwater and snowmelt water are primary factors determining the very nature of the terrestrial carbon cycle, with photosynthesis acting as the primary exchange mechanism from the atmosphere. Bicarbonate is the most prevalent ion in natural surface waters (rivers and lakes), which are extremely important in the carbon cycle, accoxmting for 90% of the carbon flux between the land surface and oceans (Holmen, Chapter 11). In addition, bicarbonate is a major component of soil water and a contributor to its natural acid-base balance. The carbonate equilibrium controls the pH of most natural waters, and high concentrations of bicarbonate provide a pH buffer in many systems. Other acid-base reactions (discussed in Chapter 16), particularly in the atmosphere, also influence pH (in both natural and polluted systems) but are generally less important than the carbonate system on a global basis. [Pg.127]

Several factors determine the response of a target cell to a hormone. These can be thought of in two general ways (1) as factors that affect the concentration of the hormone at the target cell (see Table 42—1) and (2) as factors that affect the acmal response of the target cell to the hormone (see Table 42—2). [Pg.435]

The most important factor determining the sensitivity of the conformation to the concentration of polyions is the change in ion activity or osmotic pressure with conformation. If the activity coeflScient of the counterions is sensitive to conformation then conformational change resulting from concentration changes of polyions becomes large. [Pg.80]

In crystallization from solution, as in the manufacture of salt from brine, the liquid phase is multicomponent, having one or more solvents and one or more solutes. Here both temperature and concentration are determining factors. [Pg.61]

The water residue level is also determined from the relative responses of the analytes to the internal standards. The sample residue levels are calculated by comparison with an average response factor determined by triplicate analysis of a five-point calibration curve. Samples receive 5ng of each internal standard (0.1 ngmL ) and are concentrated 50-fold by Ci8 SPE before analysis to achieve adequate instrumental sensitivity. The calculations to determine the residue level in water are outlined in Section 7.3.3. [Pg.495]

Famoxadone, IN-JS940, and IN-KZ007 residues are measured in soil (p-g kg ), sediment (p-gkg ), and water (pgL ). Quantification is based on analyte response in calibration standards and sample extract analyses determined as pg mL Calibration standard runs are analyzed before and after every 1 samples in each analytical set. Analyte quantification is based on (1) linear regression analysis of (y-axis) analyte concentration (lagmL Q and (x-axis) analyte peak area response or (2) the average response factor determined from the appropriate calibration standards. The SLOPE and INTERCEPT functions of Microsoft Excel are used to determine slope and intercept. The AVERAGE and STDEV functions of Microsoft Excel are used to determine average response factors and standard deviations. [Pg.1188]

Table 7.3 shows the concentrations of 1-5 that result in 50% growth inhibition (GI50) of five human cancer cell lines. Inspection of these data reveals that cytostatic activity of 1 and 3-5 depends on the thermodynamic favorability of the quinone methide species compared to the corresponding keto form. The most cytostatic prekinamycins 1 and 5 are associated with the thermodynamically stable quinone methides. In contrast, the inactive prekinamycins 3 and 4 are associated with thermodynamically stable keto tautomers. The exception is prekinamycin 2, which is cytostatic and possesses a relatively stable keto tautomer 3 compared to its quinone methide. Although the AE value for quinone methide tautomerization can predict cytostatic properties, prekinamycin 2 shows that there must be other factors determining biological activity. [Pg.260]

An interesting study on accumulation and retention of 95mTc by the edible winkle (Littorina littorea L.) was carried out by Swift [54] who determined a concentration factor of 45 in the whole body and a biological half-time of 115... [Pg.34]


See other pages where Concentration factors, determination is mentioned: [Pg.599]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.848]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.975]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.193]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.130 ]




SEARCH



Concentration determine

Concentration factor

Concentration, determination

Determinant factor

Determining concentration

Drinking water factors determining lead concentration

Factors Determining the Lead Concentration in Drinking Water

Factors determining

© 2024 chempedia.info