Computational Methods, QSAR

Examples that underline this statement come from the study on the permeability of 22 small non-electrolytes through lipid bilayer membranes discussed above [48], and a QSAR study has been performed (kindly supplied by C. Hansch, Data bank, Pomona College, USA)  

The permeation of toad urinary bladder by 22 non-electrolytes is another example [50]  

permeability coefficient P7, partition coefficient in hexadecane-buffer MGVOL, molecular volume. 

No significant differences were observed when log D6 5 was used instead of log D5 5. Therefore, no conclusions could be drawn about whether pH 5.5 (which corresponds to the pH in the microenvironment in the unstirred layer in neighborhood of the intestinal wall) or pH 6.5 (which corresponds to the pH of the lumen) is better 

dynamic polar molecular surface area If specific capacity factor, for details see ref 55. 

---

Nevertheless, for general design of fluorous compounds some rules have been derived by combination of empirical and computational methods (QSAR, neural network simulation) [12[. These rules are illustrated by the data in Table 3.1 and can be summarized as follows ... 

E. San2,J. Giraldo, andE. lsl. 2ia2LU., QSAR and Molecular Modeling Concepts, Computational Methods and Biological Applications,]. R. Prous Science Pubhshers,... 

With the development of accurate computational methods for generating 3D conformations of chemical structures, QSAR approaches that employ 3D descriptors have been developed to address the problems of 2D QSAR techniques, e.g., their inability to distinguish stereoisomers. The examples of 3D QSAR include molecular shape analysis (MSA) [34], distance geometry [35,36], and Voronoi techniques [37]. 

Chemoinformatics (or cheminformatics) deals with the storage, retrieval, and analysis of chemical and biological data. Specifically, it involves the development and application of software systems for the management of combinatorial chemical projects, rational design of chemical libraries, and analysis of the obtained chemical and biological data. The major research topics of chemoinformatics involve QSAR and diversity analysis. The researchers should address several important issues. First, chemical structures should be characterized by calculable molecular descriptors that provide quantitative representation of chemical structures. Second, special measures should be developed on the basis of these descriptors in order to quantify structural similarities between pairs of molecules. Finally, adequate computational methods should be established for the efficient sampling of the huge combinatorial structural space of chemical libraries. 

Computational chemists in the pharmaceutical industry also expanded from their academic upbringing by acquiring an interest in force field methods, QSAR, and statistics. Computational chemists with responsibility to work on pharmaceuticals came to appreciate the fact that it was too limiting to confine one s work to just one approach to a problem. To solve research problems in industry, one had to use the best available technique, and this did not mean going to a larger basis set or a higher level of quantum mechanical theory. It meant using molecular mechanics or QSAR or whatever. 

Basak, S. C., Mills, D., Hawkins, D. M., Kraker, J. J. Proper statistical modeling and validation in QSAR A case study in the prediction of rat fat air partitioning. In Computation in Modem Science and Engineering, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Methods in Science and Engineering 2007 (ICCMSE 2007), Simos, T. E., Maroulis, G., Eds., American Institute of Physics, Melville, New York, 2007, pp. 548-551. 

Statistical and computational methods have been used to quantify structure-activi relationships leading to quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR). The concqpt of QSAR can be dated back to the work of Crum, Brown and Fraser from 1868 to 1869, and Richardson, also in 1869. Many notable papers were published in the period leading up to the twentieth century by men such as Berthelot and Jungfleisch in 1872, Nemst in 1891, Ov ton in 1897 and Meyer in 1899 (7). Professor Corwin Hansch is now regarded by many as the father of QSAR, because of his work in the development of new and innovative techniques for QSAR. He and his co-woikers produced a paper that was to be known as the birtii of QSAR, and was oititled "Correlation of biological activity of phenoxyacetic acids with Hammett substituent constants and partition coefficients" (2). 

Because there are methods for estimating most physicochemical properties directly from structure, as discussed in Chapter 13, it is not necessary to synthesize a substance in order to obtain those physicochemical property values that need to be used as descriptors in a QSAR model. Nowadays, one can estimate most properties reasonably accurately using computational methods, incorporate the values into the appropriate QSAR regression equation, and predict the biological property of the substance even though the substance does not exist. 

Quantitative structure-activity relationships represent an attempt to correlate activities with structural descriptors of compounds. These physicochemical descriptors, which include hydrophobicity, topology, electronic properties, and steric effects, are determined empirically or, more recently, by computational methods. The success of a QSAR method depends on two factors the training dataset obtained by testing a group of chemicals and the descriptors obtained from some easily measurable or calculable property of the chemicals. 

There are, of course, opponents of replacing the experiments by QSAR-like computational methods. Their main argument, especially against toxicity testing with QSAR, is a possibility of making the false positive prediction error (i.e., active, but predicted as nonactive). However, we do believe that if the model is properly validated and the results treated with extreme criticism, probability of such error is very low, even negligible. 

D-QSAR. Since compounds are active in three dimensions and their shape and surface properties are major determinants of their activity, the attractiveness of 3D-QSAR methods is intuitively clear. Here conformations of active molecules must be generated and their features captured by use of conformation-dependent descriptors. Despite its conceptual attractiveness, 3D-QSAR faces two major challenges. First, since bioactive conformations are in many cases not known from experiment, they must be predicted. This is often done by systematic conformational analysis and identification of preferred low energy conformations, which presents one of the major uncertainties in 3D-QSAR analysis. In fact, to date there is no computational method available to reliably and routinely predict bioactive molecular conformations. Thus, conformational analysis often only generates a crude approximation of active conformations. In order to at least partly compensate for these difficulties, information from active sites in target proteins is taken into account, if available (receptor-dependent QSAR). Second, once conformations are modeled, they must be correctly aligned in three dimensions, which is another major source of errors in the system set-up for 3D-QSAR studies. 

Dudek AZ, Arodz T, Galvez J (2006) Computational methods in developing quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) a review. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 9(3) 213-228... 

For the large scale calculation of physicochemical values (e.g., screening databases or developing QSARs for large data sets), a computational method that allows for the simple and easy entry of chemical structure by, for instance, SMILES notation is recommended. 

John M. Fraser, Ruth Pachter, Steve Trohalaki, and Kevin T. Geiss, Computational Methods in Toxicology. Proceedings of an international workshop held 20-22 April 1998, in Dayton, OH, in SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 10 (2-3), 1999. 

A computational method of the structure prediction of an inhibitor is based on an analysis of the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) (Ariens, 1989 Martin et al, 1996). In this method, quantities such as volume, hydrophobicity or a number of specific groups are experimentally derived. QSAR for a given TS is a polynomial equation with n terms. Each of these terms corresponds to the number of aforementioned regions of a particular molecule under investigation. In the framework of this approach, it is necessary to define, prior to synthesis and testing, a functional relationship between molecular structure and molecular action. Then the polynomial equation can be used to predict the inhibition constant of molecules that have been not tested experimentally. 

Figure 4.1 Ligand-based virtual screening methods. The figure shows different computational methods for screening compound databases that take either a local or a global view on molecular structure. Molecular similarity methods that operate on molecular descriptors, histogram representations, superposition or (reduced) molecular graphs evaluate molecular structure globally. By contrast, local structural features are explored by substructure and pharmacophore searching or QSAR modeling.

QSAR, statistical, and computational methods are used to determine the possibility that a material is a sensitizer and the potential severity of sensitization. In vivo methods are useful to diagnose skin disorders such as drug eruptions, contact dermatitis, immediate contact reactions (contact urticaria), and more. Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) is an inflammatory skin disease, marked by a delayed skin response following skin contact with an allergic chemical. Test groups must be very large to assess this effect. To test for ACD, a test article or sample(s) must be initially exposed to the same skin site/area (induction phase). After a rest period of a week or more (others say over... 

Among the computational methods available, QSARs, or more general, quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) have been widely used not only in drug design and environmental chemistry but also in food-related studies. QSPR studies are grounded in the concept that a property (e.g., biological activity, reactivity, toxicity, volatility, etc.) depends on the molecular structure and that is possible to find a mathematical or quantitative relationship between that property and a suitable molecular representation (e.g., some combination of descriptors). 

---