Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Complexation at surfaces

Sauer, J., Ugliengo, P., Garrone, E., Saunders, V. R., 1994, Theoretical Study of Van der Waals Complexes at Surface Sites in Comparison With the Experiment , Chem. Rev., 94, 2095. [Pg.299]

J. Sauer, Theoretical study of van derWaals complexes at surface sites in comparison with the experiment. Chem. Rev. 94, 2095-2160 (1994)... [Pg.294]

Cooke G, Electrochemical and photochemical control of host-guest complexation at surfaces, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 4860-4870. [Pg.702]

Immobilising chiral transition metal complexes at surfaces... [Pg.98]

Active centers may be of several different chemical types free radicals, free ions, solvated ions, complexes at surfaces, complexes in a homogeneous phase, complexes with enzymes. Many active centers may be involved in a given reaction. Yet it is found that the advancement of the reacdon can still be described by means of a single parameter — the extent of reaction. If this is the case, the reaction is said to be single. Why an apparently complex re-... [Pg.60]

Figiire Bl.21,6. figure Bl.21,7, figure Bl.21,8 aud flgrue B 1,21,9 show several of the more complex structures solved by LEED iu recent years. They exlribit various effects observed at surfaces ... [Pg.1772]

Corrosion Control. Sihca in water exposed to various metals leads to the formation of a surface less susceptible to corrosion. A likely explanation is the formation of metahosihcate complexes at the metal—water interface after an initial dismption of the metal oxide layer and formation of an active site. This modified surface is expected to be more resistant to subsequent corrosive action via lowered surface activity or reduced diffusion. [Pg.12]

Solid state NMR is a relatively recent spectroscopic technique that can be used to uniquely identify and quantitate crystalline phases in bulk materials and at surfaces and interfaces. While NMR resembles X-ray diffraction in this capacity, it has the additional advantage of being element-selective and inherently quantitative. Since the signal observed is a direct reflection of the local environment of the element under smdy, NMR can also provide structural insights on a molecularlevel. Thus, information about coordination numbers, local symmetry, and internuclear bond distances is readily available. This feature is particularly usefrd in the structural analysis of highly disordered, amorphous, and compositionally complex systems, where diffraction techniques and other spectroscopies (IR, Raman, EXAFS) often fail. [Pg.460]

For the silica gel (Figure 3A), the solution was removed slightly less effectively, and more Cs was left (ca. 0.0020 atoms/A2). The spectral behavior is quite similar to that of boehmite, except that there is a peak due to surface Cs coordinated by only water molecules and not in contact with the surface oxygens (so-called outer sphere complexes)at 30% RH. Complete dynamical averaging among sites at frequencies greater than ca. 10 kHz occurs at 70% RH and greater. [Pg.162]

The definitions above are an abbreviated version of those used in a veiy complex and financially significant exercise with the ultimate goal of estimating resei ves and generating production forecasts in the petroleum industry. Deterministic estimates are derived largely from pore volume calculations to determine volumes of either oil nr gas in-place (OIP, GIP). This volume when multiplied by a recovery factor gives a recoverable quantity of oil or natural gas liquids—commonly oil in standard barrels or natural gas in standard cubic feet at surface conditions. Many prefer to use barrels of oil equivalency (BOE) or total hydrocarbons tor the sum of natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGL), and oil. For comparison purposes 6,000 cubic feet of gas is considered to be equivalent to one standard barrel on a British thermal unit (Btu) basis (42 U.S. gallons). [Pg.1010]

One key aspect of SOMC is the determination of the structure of surface complexes at a molecular level one of the reasons being that our goal is to assess structure-activity relationships in heterogeneous catalysis, which requires a firm characterization of active sites or more exactly active site precursors. While elemental analysis is an essential first step to understand how the organometallic complex reacts with the support, it is necessary to gather spectroscopic data in order to understand what are the ligands and... [Pg.161]

Figure 5 also shows the effect of the ionophore concentration of the Langmuir type binding isotherm. The slope of the isotherm fora membrane with 10 mM of ionophore 1 was roughly three times larger than that with 30 mM of the same ionophore. The binding constant, K, which is inversely proportional to the slope [Eq. (3)], was estimated to be 4.2 and 11.5M for the membranes with 10 mM and 30 mM ionophore 1, respectively. This result supports the validity of the present Langmuir analysis because the binding constant, K, should reflect the availability of the surface sites, the number of which should be proportional to the ionophore concentration, if the ionophore is not surface active itself In addition, the intercept of the isotherm for a membrane with 10 mM of ionophore 1 was nearly equal to that of a membrane with 30 mM ionophore 1 (see Fig. 5). This suggests the formation of a closest-packed surface molecular layer of the SHG active Li -ionophore 1 cation complex, whose surface concentration is nearly equal at both ionophore concentrations. On the other hand, a totally different intercept and very small slope of the isotherm was obtained for a membrane containing only 3 mM of ionophore 1. This indicates an incomplete formation of the closest-packed surface layer of the cation complexes due to a lack of free ionophores at the membrane surface, leading to a kinetic limitation. In this case, the potentiometric response of the membrane toward Li+ was also found to be very weak vide infra). Figure 5 also shows the effect of the ionophore concentration of the Langmuir type binding isotherm. The slope of the isotherm fora membrane with 10 mM of ionophore 1 was roughly three times larger than that with 30 mM of the same ionophore. The binding constant, K, which is inversely proportional to the slope [Eq. (3)], was estimated to be 4.2 and 11.5M for the membranes with 10 mM and 30 mM ionophore 1, respectively. This result supports the validity of the present Langmuir analysis because the binding constant, K, should reflect the availability of the surface sites, the number of which should be proportional to the ionophore concentration, if the ionophore is not surface active itself In addition, the intercept of the isotherm for a membrane with 10 mM of ionophore 1 was nearly equal to that of a membrane with 30 mM ionophore 1 (see Fig. 5). This suggests the formation of a closest-packed surface molecular layer of the SHG active Li -ionophore 1 cation complex, whose surface concentration is nearly equal at both ionophore concentrations. On the other hand, a totally different intercept and very small slope of the isotherm was obtained for a membrane containing only 3 mM of ionophore 1. This indicates an incomplete formation of the closest-packed surface layer of the cation complexes due to a lack of free ionophores at the membrane surface, leading to a kinetic limitation. In this case, the potentiometric response of the membrane toward Li+ was also found to be very weak vide infra).
The results of the above-mentioned Langmuir analysis of the SHG responses may be interpreted in terms of a tightly packed monolayer of the SHG active cation complexes at the membrane surface. The tight layer may, however, also be a layer thicker than a monolayer in which the potential aligns the complexes to the electric field. As a consequence of the increase of the potential near the surface, the oriented complexes would on the average be nearer to the surface than the average of all complexes. [Pg.447]


See other pages where Complexation at surfaces is mentioned: [Pg.248]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.899]    [Pg.935]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.1322]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.445]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.79 ]




SEARCH



At complex

Surface complex

Surface complexation

© 2024 chempedia.info