Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Competitive Surface Adsorption

COMPETITIVE SURFACE ADSORPTION BEHAVIOR OF CORROSION INHIBITORS... [Pg.266]

Figure 4.20 shows variation of electric conductivity of ZnO film in time during bombardment with silver atoms and under conditions, when the atomic beam was terminated. We believe, that the obtained results (the behaviour of conductivity in time, its relaxation) can be explained by competition of adsorption and surface aggregation of adatoms leading to the appearance of larger particles of silver (dimers, trimers, and so on) on the surface. Such particles were assumed not to provide a consid-... [Pg.249]

The competition model and solvent interaction model were at one time heatedly debated but current thinking maintains that under defined r iitions the two theories are equivalent, however, it is impossible to distinguish between then on the basis of experimental retention data alone [231,249]. Based on the measurement of solute and solvent activity coefficients it was concluded that both models operate alternately. At higher solvent B concentrations, the competition effect diminishes, since under these conditions the solute molecule can enter the Interfacial layer without displacing solvent molecules. The competition model, in its expanded form, is more general, and can be used to derive the principal results of the solvent interaction model as a special case. In essence, it seems that the end result is the same, only the tenet that surface adsorption or solvent association are the dominant retention interactions remain at variance. [Pg.708]

The bottom spectrum was obtained by cycling the electrode in CO-free SnCl /HjSO solution to ensure formation of a partial Sn adlayer and then replacing the cell contents with CO-saturated solution. The v(C0) band is still observed, which shows that the Sn adatoms do not saturate the surface even in the absence of competitive CO adsorption. The intensity and frequency of the v(C0) band have both decreased, which confirms that the CO adlayer is only partially complete. There is no evidence for a change in v(C0) beyond that expected for the coverage dependence expected in acid solution. This shows that there is no strong interaction between adsorbed CO molecules and neighboring Sn adatoms, in support of the assumptions used in the adatom oxidation model discussed above. [Pg.381]

The adsorption of contaminants on geosorbents also is affected by climatic conditions reflected in the subsurface temperature and moisture status. Calvet (1984) showed how the soil moisture content may affect adsorption of contaminants originating from agricultural practices. The moisture content determines the accessibility of the adsorption sites, and water affects the surface properties of the adsorbent. The competition for adsorption sites between water and, say, insecticides may explain this behavior. Preferential adsorption of the more polar water molecules by soil hinders... [Pg.113]

The hydration status of the clay or earth material may affect the adsorption capacity of nonpolar (or slightly polar) toxic chemicals. Continuing with parathion as a case study, Fig. 8.33 shows the increase adsorbed parathion on attapulgite from a hexane solution, as the adsorbed water on the clay surface decreases. This behavior may be explained by the competition for adsorption sites between the polar water and the slightly polar parathion. Possibly, however, the reduction in adsorption due to the presence of water is caused by the increased time required for parathion molecules to diffuse through the water film to the adsorption sites. [Pg.189]

The CsHe desorption was essentially inhibited in the presence of SO2 because sulfur species can react with Fe O radical to form a relatively stable Fe SOs Fe (see Eq. 23), resulting in a significant decline in the density of available adsorption sites for CsH . Simultaneously, the scarcity of a-02 surface species (Fe 02") due to a competitive SO2 adsorption (Eq. 22) leads to a decrease in both rates of propene oxidation and carbonaceous species (CO and CO2) formation. [Pg.42]

The equilibrium constants for the adsorption of the aldehyde and Schiff s base are Ka = kai/ka-i and Kb = kbi/kb-i respectively. Product C may adsorb but is less competitive than the surface adsorption of the Schiff s base B and aldehyde A. The total surface coverages are expressed as the sum of the adsorbed species and empty sites A -I- B -I- ° = 1. [Pg.24]

The competition for adsorption sites is very important for the kinetics of a heterogeneous catalytic reaction. For this reason sites,, are included as a reactant in the kinetic model. As a site must be either free or occupied by one of the surface intermediates, there is a conservation law for the coverages... [Pg.46]

In considering photoactivity on metal oxide and metal chalcogenide semiconductor surfaces, we must be aware that multiple sites for adsorption are accessible. On titanium dioxide, for example, there exist acidic, basic, and surface defect sites for adsorption. Adsorption isotherms will differ at each site, so that selective activation on a particular material may indeed depend on photocatalyst preparation, since this may in turn Influence the relative fraction of each type of adsorption site. The number of basic sites can be determined by titration but the total number of acidic sites is difficult to establish because of competitive water adsorption. A rough ratio of acidic to basic binding sites on several commercially available titania samples has been shown by combined surface ir and chemical titration methods to be about 2.4, with a combined acid/base site concentration of about 0.5 mmol/g . [Pg.79]

Green RJ, Davies MC, Roberts CJ et al (1999) Competitive protein adsorption as observed by surface plasmon resonance. Biomaterials 20(4) 385-391... [Pg.74]

In wet FGD processes, either DA or limestone slurry, the combined effects of calcium and magnesium actually determine the limestone dissolution rate. Sjoberg s results(fi) indicated that Ca2+ can inhibit the CaCO dissolution rate much more effectively than Mg2+ by the same surface adsorption phenomenon. The combined effects of Ca2+ and Mg2+ can be described as competitive adsorption, and the limestone surface will act as an ion-exchanger. The fraction of surface occupied by adsorbed Ca2+ and Mg2+ can be expressed as ... [Pg.194]

This effect is relatively small until the total magnesium ion concentrations reach about 1000 ppm. o The effect of Mg2+ concentration on limestone dissolution rate can be explained by a surface adsorption model. The adsorption of Mg2+ reduces the limestone dissolution rate because the surface is partially blinded by the adsorbed magnesium ions. The competitive adsorption of calcium and magnesium ions was described by a mathematical model based on the Langmuir adsorption isotherm. The model was used to explain the sensitivity of limestone dissolution rate to magnesium ion concentration under limestone DA operating conditions. [Pg.198]

Thus clearly, the sulfided state of the palladium surface depends deeply on the nature of hydrocarbon in competition of adsorption. In conclusion, on a working catalyst (in hydro-dehydro reactions), the state of a sulfided surface depends on (1) the nature of the sulfur compounds, (2) the nature of the hydrocarbons, and (3) the nature of the metallic phase. [Pg.294]

These stable DIP concentrations are believed to be controlled by a buffering of DIP through the adsorption and desorption onto metal oxide surfaces. This P buffering is believed to balance the low availability of SRP in higher-salinity waters, which occurs from phytoplankton uptake and anionic competition for surface adsorption sites. [Pg.371]

This instability can be avoided by adding a non-ionic surfactant to the surface of the latex, forming a hydrophilic layer (Triton x-405 of 30 units) on the surface of the latex [22]. In addition, this compound reduces the stacking effect by masking the hydrophobic domains (or properties) of the surface. Indeed, competition for adsorption between the ODN and the surfactant molecules can also lead to desorption. However, this effect was not observed in all reported studies, but it is in principle accessible by comparing the adsorption energies of ODN and the surfactant on the surface of the latex. [Pg.181]


See other pages where Competitive Surface Adsorption is mentioned: [Pg.181]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.958]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.958]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.640]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.330]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.239 , Pg.266 , Pg.269 ]




SEARCH



Adsorption competitive

© 2024 chempedia.info