Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Companies Act

Promotional activity and the dissemination of information are so closely linked that it is hard to see where one ends and the other begins. In the modern era, where many pairs of eyes are on the industry s activities, eager to criticise and to control, the only real option for companies is to conform to the rules and to play fair. I would suggest that since companies act by SOPs for their conduct of clinical trials, so it makes sense to have an SOP for the preparation and approval of ethical promotional material. If one does not create written procedures to cover the multiple steps in the preparation and approval of promotional copy, mistakes can be made and complaints may follow. [Pg.377]

The authorized inspector shall be designated by the owner and shall be the owner, an employee of the owner, an employee of an engineering or scientific organization, or an employee of a recognized insurance or inspection company acting as the owner s agent. The inspector shall not represent or be an employee of the piping erector, the manufacturer, or the fabricator unless the owner is also the erector, the manufacturer, or the fabricator. [Pg.126]

The cultivation of a plant during 5 years, of course, implies the use of insecticides and pesticides. Our company acted as the initiator in this field. [Pg.219]

Finally, some special provisions are made for the waiver, reduction, refund, or deferral of fees payments in emergency situations, requests from the Licensing Authority, withdrawal of an application, MA (Parallel Import) applications for multiple origin products, and for so-called small companies as defined in the Companies Act 1985 (in 1999, this was British pounds 2.8 million turnover, British pounds 1.4 million balance sheet total, and 50 employees). [Pg.816]

The following provisions apply to market research and post-marketing surveillance, whether the research is carried out directly by the manufacturer or by another company acting under its direction. [Pg.197]

Permitted, provided that the company acts responsibly... [Pg.220]

Investment Company Act, Release No. 19105, [1992 Transfer Binder] Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) 1 85,062, at 83,500 (Nov. 19, 1992) (provided in connection with the issuance of Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940). The terms "securitization," "asset secu-ritiMtion," and "structured finance" are used interchangeably. Each refers to a company s use of cash flows from its assets to raise funding. The term "securitization" specifically refers to the issuance Oi securities backed by such cash flows. [Pg.3]

In New Zealand, the 1991 Resource Management Act outlined disclosure requirements, but these were mainly limited to local authorities. However, matters are now progressing further, as the government is proposing a policy initiative to develop state of the environment reporting and to amend the 1993 Companies Act to introduce a requirement for statutory disclosure of environmental impacts by companies. [Pg.41]

Like the Hepburn Amendment before it, the Holding Company Act was a legislative assault on the existing structure of private American businesses. In both cases, however, abusive and acquisitive practices by those businesses, and the resulting public outcry, overcame Congress normal aversion to dealing with the complex internal structure of American corporations. [Pg.38]

It is no overstatement to say that the Holding Company Act was the sine qua non in the future regulatory battles over liberalization and eventual contractualization of the gas pipeline market in the US. [Pg.38]

The connection between gas transporters and distributions, within the same ownership, was a corporate form utterly rejected in the Public Utility Elolding Company Act of 1935, and an uncommonly powerful regulator, in the form of the SEC was charged with breaking them up. For reasons that those in Europe may consider manifestly obvious, the Directive never hints that public policy should include the structural separation of gas pipelines from gas distributors. The clash between those regulated and their immediate customers provided [that] the necessary tension to achieve effective and even-handed regulatory scrutiny divides the European and US gas markets. [Pg.39]

Stat. 803 (1935). The Act was only repealed in 2005 by the Energy Policy Act (EPACT) of 2005 (Section 1263), which replaced it with the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005, which provides for federal access to books and records of holding companies and their affiliates. [Pg.52]

Exempt Wholesale Generator - An unregulated subsidiary of an eiectric utiiity that is aiiowed to generate and sell wholesale power as an independent energy producer, and is exempt from the Public Utility Hoiding Company Act of 1935. [Pg.347]

Restructuring - The process of changing the structure of the electric power industry from one of guaranteed monopoly over service territories, as established by the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, to one of open competition between power suppliers for customers in any area. [Pg.404]

Often, chemical companies act as shippers of chemicals and manage the RTCs while the transport is organized by a rail operator. Basically, the shipper has two transport options ... [Pg.89]

We know that recently many companies acting as reporting statisticians put the report on a protected website, rather than sending the report to the members. Our own procedure is to send hard copies of reports because when we have not, we have noticed that some members of committees have not even looked at the web-based materials. [Pg.75]

In 2010, the biotech company ACT was preparing to enter into clinical trials of retinal cells derived from stem cells in the treatment of Stargardt s macular dystrophy. [Pg.1752]

Part IV is a miscellaneous and general part amending the Radiological Protection Act 1970, Fire Precautions Act 1971, Companies Act 1967 and stating such matters as the extent and application of the HSW Act. [Pg.39]

Knowledge of legal sanctions takes on importance according to deterrence models of corporate behaviour and law. If these models are correct then companies act to avoid sanctioning. There are a number of versions of this theory. Some suggest that the actual severity of the penalty may be significant, while others focus more heavily on the symbolic consequences of legal action. [Pg.91]


See other pages where Companies Act is mentioned: [Pg.422]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.361]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 , Pg.7 , Pg.38 , Pg.38 , Pg.39 , Pg.40 , Pg.41 , Pg.43 , Pg.46 , Pg.86 ]




SEARCH



Public Utility Holding Company Act

© 2024 chempedia.info