Committee, process hazards review

Process Hazards Reviews comprise formal committee meetings where hours are spent intensively examining, by one of the methods described later, a chemical reaction or process, with a report, documentation, and follow-up. Pre-Startup Reviews/Process Hazards Audits are no less intensive, but the time spent is less, because the complexity of the process or equipment being examined is less. Reports, documentation, and follow-up are also a part of the Pre-Startup Review/Process Hazards Audit. An equipment acceptance safety inspection would be considered a Process Hazards Audit. 

After the review method is chosen, the responsibility for holding the PHR or Pre-Startup Review falls to the line organization who contact the Process Hazards Review Committee. At the Experimental Station, each resident Laboratory or Department has a committee appropriate to its needs. In each case, the committee chairman is in a management position and can command the resources necessary to review the process or equipment successfully. It is the chairman s responsibility to assure that the review is intensive and covers all aspects of the process or equipment. The chairman also serves as the Laboratory s liaison with the Site Process Hazards Management Committee. 

The committee convened in a conference room and reviewed all the material which had previously been sent to them. This included all the information previously recommended in this paper in the first part of the Process Hazards Review Agenda section as well as environmental air emissions data and gas chromatograph procedures. 

Each major company site has a hazard review committee to administer the standard and guideline. The committee includes representatives from process safety, chemistry, reactive chemistry, manufacturing, process engineering, pilot-plant operations, and the technology center. 

As can be seen from the Global Reactive Chemicals Standard, all existing chemical processes will have a Reactive Chemicals/Process Hazard Analysis review on a predefined periodic basis. In addition, every new plant Production Leader should review their process with the Reactive Chemicals Committee within 90 days of assuming responsibility for a pilot or production plant. Prior to the review, the Leader should acquire training on the chemistry and processes that they are working with. This should include an evaluation of raw materials, processes, products and waste to understand any potential reactive chemical hazards. They should review and be prepared to answer questions from the completed and updated RC/PHA protocol questionnaire as well as other relevant materials in their plant Process Safety Folder, such as F EI, CEI, etc. The review should cover all auxiliary operations to the process such as raw material and product storage drum, tank car and truck loading. 

The next example is of a Pre-Startup Review or a Process Hazards Audit held on a piece of purchased processing equipment, a Haake Rheocord Torque Rheometer and Laboratory Twin-screw Extruder. The organization responsible for this extruder has a standard checklist of eleven pages of items to be considered by the technical person or persons in charge of the equipment or process, before the review is held. Copies of the completed checklist are then sent to each committee member before the meeting for review. Generally, in a review of this type, the group will convene at the location of the equipment rather than in a conference room to go over the material provided. In this case, the committee consisted of ... 

Some of these subcommittees, for example, those to do with process hazards analysis and with asset integrity, will be very active for most of the time and will need substantial resources. Others, such as the Operational Readiness Review committee, may not have much to do except at... 

Hazard Review Committee. This committee will conduct all phases of design review for equipment and processes. In addition to the project... 

Safety, Health, And Environmental Professional. Serving as a member of the hazard review committee, the safety, health, and environmental professional will assist in identifying and evaluating hazards in the design process and provide counsel as to their avoidance, elimination, or control. Special training programs for the review committee may be recommended by the safety, health, and environmental professional. Also, consultants may be recommended who would complete hazards analyses, other than for the What-If system. 

If a proposed change falls outside of plant specifications, codes of practice, or is relatively new technology, then a chemical process safety review team evaluation may be in order. Different organizations provide various names to process safely review teams, such as Safe Operations Committee, Hazards Review Committee, Technical Support Team, Facility and Operations Change Review Committee, or Chemical Process Safety Review Team. Typically, this technical safely committee is chaired by... 

Safety, Health, and Environmental Professional Serving as a member of the hazard review committee, the safety, health, and environmental professional will assist in identifying and evaluating hazards in the design process and provide counsel as to... 

Objectives Gather data and discuss secondary waste issues specific to Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility (TOCDF). Tour portions of TOCDF and alocal Utah hazardous waste incineration facility to familiarize committee with processes and practices. Discuss secondary waste regulatory issues with Utah environmental regulatory officials and representatives of Utah s Citizens Advisory Commission (CAC). Review initial findings, discuss report development, make writing assignments, and decide on future activities. 

Mindset refers to the mental attitude people have about the process of disposal and the state of the system during processing. In the incidents studied, people behaved at times as if they assumed that an ACAMS alarm was false, that contaminated waste was less hazardous than raw agent, or that parts coming through a furnace were automatically 5X mate-rial.- During its review of incidents, the committee... 

---