Column variables

The two main ways of data pre-processing are mean-centering and scaling. Mean-centering is a procedure by which one computes the means for each column (variable), and then subtracts them from each element of the column. One can do the same with the rows (i.e., for each object). ScaUng is a a slightly more sophisticated procedure. Let us consider unit-variance scaling. First we calculate the standard deviation of each column, and then we divide each element of the column by the deviation. 

Measurement tables are the raw data that result from measurements on a set of objects. For the sake of simplicity we restrict our arguments to measurements obtained by means of instraments on inert objects, although they equally apply to sensory observations and to living subjects. By convention, a measurement table is organized such that its rows correspond to objects (e.g. chemical substances) and that its columns refer to measurements (e.g. physicochemical parameters). Here we adopt the point of view that objects are described in the table by means of the measurements performed upon them. Objects and measurements will also be referred to in a more general sense as row-variables and column-variables. 

Historically, a distinction has been made between PCA of column-variables and that of row-variables. These are referred to as R-mode or Q-mode PCA, respectively. The modem approach is to consider both analyses as dual and to unify the two views (of rows and columns) into a single display, which is called biplot and which will be discussed in greater detail later on. 

This bipolar axis defines a contrast between the column-variables j and f. 

Any data matrix can be considered in two spaces the column or variable space (here, wavelength space) in which a row (here, spectrum) is a vector in the multidimensional space defined by the column variables (here, wavelengths), and the row space (here, retention time space) in which a column (here, chromatogram) is a vector in the multidimensional space defined by the row variables (here, elution times). This duality of the multivariate spaces has been discussed in more detail in Chapter 29. Depending on the chosen space, the PCs of the data matrix... 

A row of a data matrix can be interpreted as a point in the space defined by its column variables. 

In the previous section we have seen that axes defined by the column variables can be rotated. It is also possible to rotate the principal components. Instead of rotating the axes which define the column space of X, we rotate here the significant PCs in the sub-space defined by V ... 

At this point, column/variable attributes can be changed. For instance, in the preceding window you see that the Lab Test field defaults to 255 characters wide, which you can easily reduce if desired. If you then click Results in the left pane, you can change where the SAS data set is stored. At this point, click Run and you will see that the import into SAS has taken place in SAS Enterprise Guide. 

To build the XML map, table spaces (data sets) and columns (variables) can be dragged from the pane on the left and dropped in the pane on the right. There are several useful tabs available in the upper-right pane. They are as follows ... 

Row Mean Scores Differ For an ordinal column variable, a significant p-value here indicates that the mean CMH score differs across columns for at least one stratum. P CMHRMS... 

Many of the possible column combinations that are useful in 2DLC are listed in Chapter 5. Besides the actual types of column stationary phases, for example, anion-exchange chromatography (AEC), size exclusion chromatography (SEC), and RPLC, many other column variables must be determined for the successful operation of a 2DLC instrument. The attributes that comprise the basic 2DLC experiment are listed in Table 6.1. 

Select a term arsxs, in row (equation) r, column (variable) s, with ars 0 called the pivot term. 

Unfortunately, none of the commonly used molecular probes is adequate to evaluate column-to-column variabilities [88]. The absolute prediction of retention of any compound involves the use of a rather complex equation [89,90] that necessitates the knowledge of various parameters for both the solute and the solvent [91]. The relative prediction of retention is based on the existence of a calibration line describing the linearity between log and interaction index. This second approach, although less general than the first, is simpler to use in practice, and it often gives more accurate results than the first. With a proper choice of calibration solutes, it is possible to take into account subtle mobile phase effects that cannot be included in the theoretical treatment. 

The choice of column should be made after careful consideration of mode of chromatography, column-to-column variability, and a number of other considerations [3-5]. A short discussion on columns and column packings is given below. The column packings may be classified according to the following features [2] ... 

When a row, i, is chosen that introduces one or more potential iterates, the next rows are chosen according to the following conditions (a) Each row contains one and only one nonzero element in a column not yet chosen as an output column (variable), or column which is not yet a potential... 

FIGURE 2.1 Simple multivariate data matrix X with n rows (objects) and m columns (variables, features). An example (right) with m — 3 variables shows each object as a point in a three-dimensional coordinate system. 

Experimental results are generally grouped in tables two-dimensional matrices Xnv formed by N rows (objects = samples) and V columns (variables = chemical quantities, sensorial scores, physical quantities,. . . ). It is very difficult to read and understand the information contained in a large data matrix, therefore it is really... 

Note how in this instance the column-to-column variability is so large that the suitability for use must certainly be questioned. 

The numerical entry represents the power to which the row variable, varied alone, must be raised to be proportional to the column variable to the first power. For example, the column variable SNR is proportional to the row variable Rs1/2 in the signal-limited case and to Rs1 in the background-limited case. 

The relative "goodness" of a column is expressed in terms of efficiency, n/L, as plates per foot. A 6-foot column having 2000 plates would only be half as efficient as a 3-foot column with the same number of plates. Although the total number of plates, n, influences the degree to which peaks will be resolved, column efficiency is a measure of how well the column has been prepared and operated. A performance of 1000 plates per foot can be obtained but 500 is reasonable anything less is indicative of a problem. Column efficiency is also expressed as h, which is the length of column (expressed in millimeters) equivalent to one theoretical plate. This efficiency is related to column variables by the van Deemter equation ... 

PCA [ 12-19] can be used to obtain an overview of a set of data organized in a table X with n rows (subjects) and p columns (variables). By means of PCA, most of the variation in X is summarized in a few principal components (Figure 6.5). More specifically, the first PC is the main axis of the shape of the data scatter. Hence, the first PC explains the largest part of the variance in X. if X contains similar objects, PCA can be used to formulate a model of the... 

Efficiency of the chromatographic system can be determined from the number of theoretical plates per meter. Although this term primarily describes the property and resolution efficiency of a column, other extra column variables, such as the... 

If we desire to study the effects of two independent variables (factors) on one dependent factor, we will have to use a two-way analysis of variance. For this case the columns represent various values or levels of one independent factor and the rows represent levels or values of the other independent factor. Each entry in the matrix of data points then represents one of the possible combinations of the two independent factors and how it affects the dependent factor. Here, we will consider the case of only one observation per data point. We now have two hypotheses to test. First, we wish to determine whether variation in the column variable affects the column means. Secondly, we want to know whether variation in the row variable has an effect on the row means. To test the first hypothesis, we calculate a between columns sum of squares and to test the second hypothesis, we calculate a between rows sum of squares. The between-rows mean square is an estimate of the population variance, providing that the row means are equal. If they are not equal, then the expected value of the between-rows mean square is higher than the population variance. Therefore, if we compare the between-rows mean square with another unbiased estimate of the population variance, we can construct an F test to determine whether the row variable has an effect. Definitional and calculational formulas for these quantities are given in Table 1.19. 

Inspection of Table 1.20 shows that we reject the hypotheses of no effect of the column variable or the row variable. Both type of catalyst and temperature seem to have an effect. Of course, we have made only a preliminary survey. We would now take more data to determine which catalyst was best and to evaluate a quantitative relationship on the temperature effect. 

The parameter p is the contribution of the grand mean, a is the contribution of the i-th level of the row variable, Pj is the contribution of the j-th level of the column variable, and is the random experimental error. The model in Eq. (1.128) does not contain what is usually referred to as row-column interaction that is, the row and... 

In unit operations control, the individual column variables are treated only as constraints and so long as the values of these constraints are within acceptable limits, the column is controlled (optimized) to maximize production rate, profitability, etc. Economics of individual fractionators may continually change throughout the life of the plant, because energy savings can be important at one particular time, whereas product recovery can be more important at other times. 

The first subsystem to be optimized is the column. Given a set of specified product purities and column pressure the reflux ratio remains as the only column variable, that is, Ap is a function of reflux ratio. Using values for X and As obtained from the analysis of the working design, Ap is computed from Equation 35 for several values of reflux ratio (Table III). The optimal reflux ratio is obtained via a search of these values. 

The MESH equations can be regarded as a large system of interrelated, nonlinear algebraic equations. The mathematical method used to solve these equations as a group is the Newton-Raphson method. The solution gives the steady-state values of the column variables temperatures, flow rates, compositions, etc. A particular rigorous method may not make use of all of the MESH equations in the Newton-Raphson portion of the method. Instead, it may solve the remaining MESH equations by some other means. The methods in Secs. 

Oscillation in the column variables This occurs where the temperature and flow rate profiles swing widely either side of what should be the final answer, often in the Newton-Raphson-based methods. Oscillation is caused by too large a Step in the profiles from one column trial to the next. This oscillation is prevented by limiting the step or percentage change in the MESH variables to below the amount generated by the Newton-Raphson technique. 

When this procedure is repeated for every possible pair of overlapping bands in the sample, and the/ s plots for each band pair are superimposed, the ORM plot of Fig. 25b results. Now it is seen that the white area for R > 1.0 is very much reduced. Also indicated (x) is the optimum composition for maximizing the resolution of the most poorly separated band pair. The actual separation based on this optimum mobile-phase composition is shown in Fig. 26 for several nominally similar 25-cm silica columns. The desired resolution (Rg > 1.0) is indeed observed for all three columns. This is an important point when retention optimization is applied to complex mixtures if column-to-column variability in retention is significant, an optimum separation on one column may not be transferable to... 

---