Cohesive energy balance

The smaller drops follow. Both liquids accelerate in the holes, because the sum of the cross section of all the holes is less than half the column cross section. However, this motion is retarded within a short distance, whereby a zone of drop compaction results above the trays. These phenomena are modeled based on a balance of maximum and minimum kinetic energy and the cohesive energy of the droplets [1]. After that, the resulting equation for the maximum stable drop diameter in the field of pulsing is ... 

The molecular packing of MOMs results from a precise and subtle balance of several intermolecular interactions within a narrow cohesion energy range of less than 1 eV molec . This is the reason why crystal engineering is so powerful because this balance can be intentionally modified but at the same time it implies that MOMs are soft materials and that polymorphism is favoured. Detailed descriptions on the fundamentals of interatomic and intermolecular interactions can be found in many books (see e.g., Kitaigorodskii, 1961). Here we briefly describe the relevant interactions for MOMs and give a new approach supported on the nanoscience perspective. 

The property of interest to characterize a surfactant or a mixture of surfactants is its hydrophilic-lipophilic tendency, which has been expressed in many different ways through a variety of concepts such as the hydrophiUc-lipophilic balance (HLB), the phase inversion temperature (PIT), the cohesive energy ratio (CER), the surfactant affinity difference (SAD) or the hydrophilic-lipophilic deviation (HLD) [1], which were found to be more or less satisfactory depending on the case. In the next section, the quantification of the effects of the different compounds involved in the formulation of surfactant-oil-water systems will be discussed in details to extract the concept of characteristic parameter of the surfactant, as a way to quantify its hydrophilic-lipophilic property independently of the nature of the physicochemical environment. 

For nonionic surfactants, an optimization of the process was achieved by using a similar approach to the so-called Cohesive Energy Ratio (CER) concept developed by Beerbower and Hill for the stability of classical emulsions (H). Its basic assumption is that the partial solubility parameters of oil and emulsifier lipophilic tail and of water and hydrophilic head are perfectly matched. Thus, the Vinsor cohesive energy ratio Ro, which determines the nature and the stability of an emulsion, is directly related to the emulsifier HliB (hydrophile-lipophile balance) by... 

This energy balance depends on the energy of the applied strain and the energy of surface. We have consistently assumed that the energy input is lower than the cohesive energy of filler particles. But this is not always true. ... 

Four different emulsifier selection methods can be applied to the formulation of microemulsions (i) the hydrophilic-lipophilic-balance (HLB) system (ii) the phase-inversion temperature (PIT) method (iii) the cohesive energy ratio (CER) concept and (iv) partitioning of the cosurfactant between the oil and water phases. The first three methods are essentially the same as those used for the selection of emulsifiers for macroemulsions. However, with microemulsions attempts should be made to match the chemical type of the emulsifier with that of the oil. A summary of these various methods is given below. 

The Hansen characterization is usually considered a sphere, even although it is really a modified spheroid. The constant 4 in Equation 10.4 modifies the spheroid to a sphere. The cohesion energy parameters of those liquids where affinities are highest are located within the sphere. The center of the sphere has the values of the bpp, and parameters, taken as characteristic for the solute. This may not be quite true because of entropy effects. The radius of the sphere, R, reflects the condition where the free energy change, AG, for the process being considered is zero. This is discussed here in terms of the mixing process, for which reason the superscript M is used. The entropy effects, and enthalpy effects, ATP, are in balance. Thus, on the sphere surface... 

The theoretical fracture strength of a material can be deduced from the cohesive forces between the component atoms in the plane under consideration from a simple energy balance between the work to fracture and the energy require to create two new surfaces. It can be shown that the theoretical cohesive strength is given by... 

I summarize briefly below the basic concepts of this approach, which is derived from that developed by Beerbower and Hill [31] for the stability of classical nonionic emulsions, which is referred to as the cohesive energy ratio (CER) concept. The treatment lies in a perfect chemical match between the partial solubility parameters of oil ( ) and surfactant lipophilic tail 6]) and of water and hydrophilic head. Under these conditions, one obtains for the optimum HLB (hydrophile-lipophile balance) of the surfactant the relation... 

Polymer solutions are obtained by complete dissolution of the macromolecule into a solvent. As in any case of dissolution of a solute in a solvent, dissolution phenomena are controlled by the balance between, on the one hand, solute-solute and solvent-solvent interaction forces and, on the other hand, solute-solvent interaction forces. Thus, general thermodynamic considerations, including solubility parameters and cohesive energy density notions, can help us to predict whether or not a polymer can be soluble in a given solvent. Nevertheless, solubilisation of a polymer in a suitable solvent is a more complex phenomenon than solubilisation of a small molecule, and it generally takes a long time because it requires several steps. 

Research into optimal formulations is based on the idea of cohesive energy ratio (CER). This was originally developed to stabilise classic non-ionic surfactant emulsions [6.13]. Despite its limitations, the CER concept unifies the ideas of solubility parameters and HUB. Recall that the HLB is a measure of the emulsifying power of surfactants and is based on their hydrophile-lipophile balance [6.3]. It can be calculated from a simple formula involving only relative weights of sequences HLB = 20 x Mh/Mt, where Mh is the molecular weight... 

---