Cobalt-ruthenium catalysts

Thus mixtures containing methyl iodide, which generates the protonic acids, HI and HRu(CO)3l3, and ionic iodides (Nal, KI), which provide the Lewis acid (K , Na ), give the highest yields of ethanol and the highest reaction rates (Table II) analogously to that found with cobalt-ruthenium catalysts (Ru/Co 2 I /Co 5) (13). ... 

The use of cobalt/ruthenium catalyst systems giving high ethanol yields has been claimed in patents by Commercial Solvents (39), British Petroleum (40], Exxon (411, Gulf [42], Rhonc-Poulcnc (43], and Union Carbide [44]. Usually... 

Proven, industrially used catalysts are mostly based on either iron or cobalt. Ruthenium is an active F-T catalyst but is too expensive for industrial use. Both Fe and Co are prepared by several techniques including both precipitation and impregnation of (e.g. alumina or silica) supports. The more noble Ni catalyst produces nearly exclusively methane and is used for the removal of trace of CO in H2. 

Iglesia, E., Soled, S. L., Fiato, R. A., and Via, G. H. 1993. Bimetallic synergy in cobalt-ruthenium Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalysts. J. Catal. 143 345-68. 

Mossbauer spectroscopy is one of the techniques that is relatively little used in catalysis. Nevertheless, it has yielded very useful information on a number of important catalysts, such as the iron catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch and ammonia synthesis, and the cobalt-molybdenum catalyst for hydrodesulfurization reactions. The technique is limited to those elements that exhibit the Mossbauer effect. Iron, tin, iridium, ruthenium, antimony, platinum and gold are the ones relevant for catalysis. Through the Mossbauer effect in iron, one can also obtain information on the state of cobalt. Mossbauer spectroscopy provides valuable information on oxidation states, magnetic fields, lattice symmetry and lattice vibrations. Several books on Mossbauer spectroscopy [1-3] and reviews on the application of the technique on catalysts [4—8] are available. 

The asymmetric synthesis of allenes via enantioselective hydrogenation of ketones with ruthenium(II) catalyst was reported by Malacria and co-workers (Scheme 4.11) [15, 16]. The ketone 46 was hydrogenated in the presence of iPrOH, KOH and 5 mol% of a chiral ruthenium catalyst, prepared from [(p-cymene) RuC12]2 and (S,S)-TsDPEN (2 equiv./Ru), to afford 47 in 75% yield with 95% ee. The alcohol 47 was converted into the corresponding chiral allene 48 (>95% ee) by the reaction of the corresponding mesylate with MeCu(CN)MgBr. A phosphine oxide derivative of the allenediyne 48 was proved to be a substrate for a cobalt-mediated [2 + 2+ 2] cycloaddition. 

In 1989, a method for the peroxysilylation of alkenes nsing triethylsUane and oxygen was reported by Isayama and Mnkaiyama (eqnation 25). The reaction was catalyzed by several cobalt(II)-diketonato complexes. With the best catalyst Co(modp)2 [bis(l-morpholinocarbamoyl-4,4-dunethyl-l,3-pentanedionato)cobalt(n)] prodnct yields ranged between 75 and 99%. DiaUcyl peroxides can also be obtained starting from tertiary amines 87, amides 89 or lactams via selective oxidation in the a-position of the Af-fnnctional group with tert-butyl hydroperoxide in the presence of a ruthenium catalyst as presented by Murahashi and coworkers in 1988 ° (Scheme 38). With tertiary amines 87 as substrates the yields of the dialkyl peroxide products 88 ranged between 65 and 96%, while the amides 89 depicted in Scheme 38 are converted to the corresponding peroxides 90 in yields of 87% (R = Me) and 77% (R = Ph). 

It is clear that ruthenium-cobalt-iodide catalyst dispersed in low-melting tetrabutylphosphonium bromide provides a unique means of selectively converting synthesis gas in one step to acetic acid. Modest changes in catalyst formulation can, however, have profound effects upon liquid product composition. 

Monometallic ruthenium, bimetallic cobalt-ruthenium and rhodium-ruthenium catalysts coupled with iodide promoters have been recognized as the most active and selective systems for the hydrogenation steps of homologation processes (carbonylation + hydrogenation) of oxygenated substrates alcohols, ethers, esters and carboxylic acids (1,2). 

The predominance of the ruthenium iodocarbonyl over the cobalt carbonyl species in the bimetallic Co-Ru systems is evidenced by the I.R. spectra of the catalytic solutions of the methyl acetate homologation with cobalt and ruthenium catalysts used in about the same concentration or with an excess of ruthenium. The latter compositions actually show the highest activity for the homologation... 

The behaviour of the ruthenium catalysts is quite different from that previously reported for cobalt carbonyl catalysts, which give a mixture of aldehydes and their acetals by formylation of the alkyl group of the orthoformate (19). The activity of rhodium catalysts, with and without iodide promoters,is limited to the first step of the hydrogenation to diethoxymethane and to a simple carbonylation or formylation of the ethyl groups to propionates and propionaldehyde derivatives (20). 

Nickel, cobalt, copper, ruthenium, and copper-ruthenium catalysts modified with optically active amino acid or hydroxy acid have been extensively investigated by Klabunovskii s group since 1964 (82). However, those catalysts have been reported to have lower EDA than that of MRNi. 

A mechanism possibly involving intermolecular hydride transfer in this promoted ruthenium system is thus very different from the reaction pathways presented for the cobalt and unpromoted ruthenium catalysts, where the evidence supports an intramolecular hydrogen atom transfer in the formyl-producing step. Nevertheless, reactions following this step could be similar in all of these systems, since the observed products are essentially the same. Thus, a chain growth process through aldehyde intermediates, as outlined earlier, may apply to this ruthenium system also. 

Selectivities to ethanol are relatively high for certain cobalt and ruthenium catalyst systems. In both metal systems, most of the ethanol observed is... 

The use of water-soluble catalysts in this reaction has hardly been investigated. Ruthenium/edta (78) and cobalt/tppts (79) catalysts have been described. The use of palladium/tppms catalyst was also reported (80). When edta and tppms are used as ligands, leaching of the metal by the product stream takes place. In the case of the cobalt/tppts catalyst, a high CO partial pressure and a catalyst concentration of >8 mol% are necessary. The reason for this effect is not clear. 

Cobaltocenium calix[4]arene receptors, characteristics, 12,475 Cobaltocenium-metallacarborane salts, preparation, 3, 23 Cobaltocenium receptors, characteristics, 12, 474 Cobalt phosphines, as supports, 12, 683 Cobalt-platinum nanoparticles, preparation, 12, 74 Cobalt-ruthenium clusters, as heterogeneous catalyst precursors, 12, 768... 

It should be noted that the KAAP process uses a ruthenium catalyst rather than an iron-based catalyst. The advantages of this catalyst and the KAAP process are discussed below57. In 2001 it was reported that Project and Development India Ltd. (PDIL) had a research program in place to produce ammonia at low temperature (100°C) and low pressure (20 to 40 kg/cm2 g). The catalyst is based on cobalt and ruthenium212. 

Dautzenberg et al. (3) have determined the kinetics of the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis with ruthenium catalysts. The authors showed, that because the synthesis can be described by a consecutive mechanism, the non steady state behaviour of the catalyst can give information about the kinetics of the process. On ruthenium they found that not only the overall rate of hydrocarbon production per active site is small, but also that the rate constant of propagation is low. Hence, Dautzenberg et al. find that the low activity of Fischer-Tropsch catalysts is due to the low intrinsic activity of their sites. On the other hand, Rautavuoma (4) states that the low activity of cobalt catalysts is due to a small amount of active sites, the amount being much smaller than the number of adsorption sites measured. 

---