Classical dynamical mass

If there is no explicit external electromagnetic field, the covariant field equations determine a self-interaction energy that can be interpreted as a dynamical electron mass Sm. Since this turns out to be infinite, renormalization is necessary in order to have a viable physical theory. Field quantization is required for quantitative QED. The classical field equation for the electromagnetic field can be solved explicitly using the Green function or Feynman propagator GPV, whose Fourier transform is —gllv/K2, where k = kp — kq is the 4-momentum transfer. The product of y0 and the field-dependent term in the Dirac Hamiltonian, Eq. (10.3), is 

In relativistic theory, it is desirable to retain covariant forms in the equations of motion. Instead of Eq. (10.3), Eq. (10.2) can be rewritten as 

---

The laws of classical dynamics were first formulated by Newton. The first law states that any particle will persist in its state of uniform unaccelerated motion unless it is acted upon by a force. Using the notation xiy y, z, for the cartesian coordinates of the ith point particle, of mass mi Newton s equations for n point particles are... 

The disturbance carries momentum and energy, but by a mechanism that seems to be inconsistent with the accepted ideas of classical dynamics. According to Newton s second law the force exerted on a particle of mass m at vector position r, is F = mr. Seen from another frame of reference, moving at a constant velocity v, relative to the first, the position of the particle is perceived to be... 

The classical dynamics of a system of n particles with masses nti and positions ri is governed by Newton s equation of motion,... 

Dynamics is the study of matter in motion. The starting point for classical dynamics is Newton s equation of motion for a particle of mass m at position r = r(t), the force F leads to motion described by... 

Restriction (i) implies that history of the system is not a relevant thermodynamic property. Restriction (ii) implies that position or orientation of the system are not considered thermodynamic properties, because different observers must be free to select their own preferred laboratory coordinate systems. (Note that omission of position r as a relevant property strongly distinguishes thermodynamics from classical dynamics, where spatial location r of the center of mass is a prominent variable of the system.)... 

Equation 2.79 stems from classical dynamics, based on the relative reduced masses of H, D, and T. Similarly, a further relationship may be calculated,55 based on classical properties... 

Thus as a starting point for understanding the bombardment process we have developed a classical dynamics procedure to model the motion of atomic nuclei. The predictions of the classical model for the observables can be compared to the data from sputtering, spectrometry (SIMS), fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry (FABMS), and plasma desorption mass spectrometry (PDMS) experiments. In the circumstances where there is favorable agreement between the results from the classical model and experimental data It can be concluded that collision cascades are Important. The classical model then can be used to look at the microscopic processes which are not accessible from experiments In order to give us further insight into the ejection mechanisms. 

The collision is described here by classical dynamics, and we assume that the motion takes place in a spherically symmetric potential U(r). It is well known that the relative motion of the atoms is equivalent to the motion of a particle with the reduced mass p, in an effective one-dimensional potential given by... 

PSD turns out to be a Gaussian-like function of jco foo- The model applies equally well to the isotopically substituted formaldehydes (Fig. 39), for which the observed shift of PSD s to higher jco values is proportional to the square root of the reduced mass of the molecule. Chang et al. studied the decay of formaldehyde using classical trajectories on a semiempirical six-dimensional PES [315] starting the trajectories at the TS. Since the final step of the reaction is very fast, classical dynamics produce PSD s which agree well with the experiment. 

Suppose one has a collection of several hundred (or thousand) molecules that interact with each other via pair-wise potentials. The molecules can be non-spherical in shape, but we will simplify the problem at this point by assuming that they are rigid (i.e., that their shapes are fixed and that internal degrees of freedom play no role in their dynamics). If they move according to the laws of classical dynamics, the center-of-mass velocity V of molecule i with mass m changes with time according to ... 

Other important examples which exhibit both confinement and diffusion in the classical dynamics of their cyclic collective coordinates are the positronium [20] and the excitonic [14] atom. Because of the comparable masses of the two particles in both cases the mean CM velocity as well as the diffusion constant are orders of magnitude larger than the corresponding values of the hydrogen atom. 

As a consequence of the collective motion of the neutral system across the homogeneous magnetic field, a motional Stark term with a constant electric field arises. This Stark term inherently couples the center of mass and internal degrees of freedom and hence any change of the internal dynamics leaves its fingerprints on the dynamics of the center of mass. In particular the transition from regularity to chaos in the classical dynamics of the internal motion is accompanied in the center of mass motion by a transition from bounded oscillations to an unbounded diffusional motion. Since these observations are based on classical dynamics, it is a priori not clear whether the observed classical diffusion will survive quantization. From both the theoretical as well as experimental point of view a challenging question is therefore whether quantum interference effects will lead to a suppression of the diffusional motion, i.e. to quantum localization, or not. 

We study this simple-looking system in classical dynamics. The initial conditions for running the classical trajectories are systematically set as follows. All the initial geometry is selected so as to be located in the basin of PBP structure and deformed slightly and randomly from the minimum energy structure, at which a trajectory begins to run with the zero initial momenta so that the velocity of the center of mass and the total angular momentum are all taken to be zero. The relevant technical details are found in Ref. 19. 

While these features lead to some pathologies in the formulation of quantum-classical dynamics and statistical mechanics, the violations are in terms of higher order in h for the bath (or, better, the mass ratio /i), so that for systems where quantum-classical dynamics is likely to be applicable the numerical consequences are often small. We remark that almost all quantum-classical schemes suffer from these problems, although these deficiencies are often not highlighted. 

The density matrix p R,P) is not stationary under quantum-classical dynamics. Instead, the equilibrium density of a quantum-classical system has to be determined by solving the equation itpwe = 0. An explicit solution of this equation has not been found although a recursive solution, obtained by expressing the density matrix pwe in a power series in ft or the mass ratio p, can be determined. While it is difficult to find the full solution to all orders in ft, the solution is known anal3dically to 0 h). When expressed in the adiabatic basis, the result is [5]... 

As said in Sect. 2, the iron core left over following Si burning suffers a dynamical instability as a result of endothermic electron captures and Fe photodid-integration. To a first approximation, this gravitational instability sets in near the classical Chandrasekhar mass limit for cold white dwarfs, Mch = 5.83 T) , Ye being the electron mole fraction. In the real situation of a hot stellar core, collapse may start at masses that differ somewhat from this value, depending on the details of the core equation of state. The reader is referred to [18] (especially Chaps. 12 and 13) for a detailed discussion of the implosion mechanism and for its theoretical outcome and observable consequences. Here, we just briefly summarise the situation. 

The time-independent Schrodinger equation (SE) for a molecular system derives from Hamiltonian classical dynamics and includes atomic nuclei as well as electrons. Eigenfunctions are therefore functions of both electronic and nuclear coordinates. Very often, however, the nuclear and electronic variables can be separated. The motion of the heavy particles may be treated using classical mechanics. Particularly at high temperatures, the Heisenberg uncertainty relation Ap Ax > /i/2 is easy to satisfy for atomic nuclei, which have a particle mass at least 1836 times the electron mass. The immediate problem for us is to obtain a time-independent SE including not only the electrons but also the nuclei and subsequently solve the separation problem. 

The language of QM has only a limited correspondence with the language of common objects or even with the specialized language of classical dynamics. In the QM equations for a hydrogen atom, for example, there are no explicit forces or motions, no trajectory of the electron around the nucleus, and indeed there are no material bodies (although there still is mass). The only quantum mechanical reality is a wavefunction that gives the probability of finding the electron at a position x around the nucleus. 

The central field problem distinguishes celestial mechanics from other areas of classical dynamics. This deals with the motion of a test particle, whose mass is negligible with respect to the central body, in the gravitational field of a point mass. The extended version of this problem is to allow the central mass to have a finite spatial extent, to depart from spherical symmetry, and perhaps to rotate. The basic Newtonian problem is the foUowing. 

The accuracy of the CSP approximation is, as test calculations for model. systems show, typically very similar to that of the TDSCF. The reason for this is that for atomic scale masses, the classical mean potentials are very similar to the quantum mechanical ones. CSP may deviate significantly from TDSCF in cases where, e.g., the dynamics is strongly influenced by classically forbidden regions of phase space. However, for simple tunneling cases it seems not hard to fix CSP, by running the classical trajectories slightly above the barrier. In any case, for typical systems the classical estimate for the mean potential functions works extremely well. 

Besides the interaction potential, an equation is also needed for describing the dynamics of the system, i.e. how the system evolves in time. In classical mechanics this is Newton s second law (F is the force, a is the acceleration, r is the position vector and m the particle mass). 

---