Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Chromatography temperature monitoring

The gases used were purchased premixed in aluminum cylinders to avoid carbonyl formation. The high purity gas mixture was further purified by a zeolite water trap and a copper carbonyl trap. The gas pressure in the reactor was measured with a capci-tance manometer and the fTow monitored with a mass fTow controT-ler. The typical gas flow rates were 15 cc/min (STP) and the maximum conversion was 1% based on integration of hydrocarbon products. The hydrocarbon products were analyzed by gas chromatography (temperature programmed chromosorb 102, FID). [Pg.125]

Amino acids have been detected fluorimetrically after ion-exchange chromatography by monitoring the fluorescent derivatives produced on treatment with o-phthalaldehyde and 2-mercaptoethanol [57]. An Aminco-Bowman fluoromicrophotometer was used for the detection. An advantage of this technique is that only 2 min were required at room temperature for formation of the products, thus avoiding the lengthy reaction coils of the ninhydrin and cerium(IV) systems. [Pg.106]

A solution of substrate (0.20 mmol), pyrene-dimethyltinhydride (1.2 equiv.), and 2,2 -azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN, 0.1 equiv.) in dry degassed benzene (1-2 ml) was stirred under reflux for 1 h [thin-layer chromatography (TLC) monitoring] under inert atmosphere. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and evaporated. Methanol/dichloromethane (3 2, 4 ml) was added followed by the addition of activated carbon (800 mg). The suspension was stirred for 30 min [the adsorption of the pyrene core was monitored by ultraviolet (UV)]. After filtration, the activated carbon was washed with methanol and the combined filtrates were concentrated to yield the product in pure form. [Pg.357]

The hardware employed in preparative liquid chromatography typically has the capability for feedback control of the pumps, automatic column switching, column backflushing, recycling, gradient mixing, online pressure, flow rate, UV-absorbance, and temperature monitoring, and automatic pneumatic actuation of fraction collection valves based on time, volume, or UV-absorbance thresholds. These capabilities are afforded by computer control. [Pg.12]

The checkers found considerable variation in the rate of the reaction in different runs, the time required for its completion ranging from 3 to 10 hours. It is therefore advisable to monitor the progress of the reaction. For this purpose small aliquots (ca. 0.05 ml.) were withdrawn from the flask with a syringe and hydrolyzed by injection into a vial containing ether and saturated ammonium chloride. The relative amoimts of enol silane and cyclopropoxy sdane were determined by gas chromatography on an 0.6 cm. X 3.7 m. column of 3% OV-17 coated on 100-120 mesh Chromosorb W. With a column temperature of 120° and a carrier gas flow rate of 20 ml. per minute, the retention times for the enol silane and the cyclopropoxy silane are ca. 1.9 and 2.3 minutes, respectively. [Pg.59]

After reduction and surface characterization, the iron sample was moved to the reactor and brought to the reaction conditions (7 atm, 3 1 H2 C0, 540 K). Once the reactor temperature, gas flow and pressure were stabilized ( 10 min.) the catalytic activity and selectivity were monitored by on-line gas chromatography. As previously reported, the iron powder exhibited an induction period in which the catalytic activity increased with time. The catalyst reached steady state activity after approximately 4 hours on line. This induction period is believed to be the result of a competition for surface carbon between bulk carbide formation and hydrocarbon synthesis.(6,9) Steady state synthesis is reached only after the surface region of the catalyst is fully carbided. [Pg.127]

The experimental results are presented for the esterification of dodecanoic acid (C12H24O2) with 2-ethylhexanol (CgHigO) and methanol (CH4O), in presence of solid acid catalysts (SAC). Reactions were performed using a system of six parallel reactors (Omni-Reacto Station 6100). In a typical reaction 1 eq of dodecanoic acid and 1 eq of 2-ethylhexanol were reacted at 160°C in the presence of 1 wt% SAC. Reaction progress was monitored by gas chromatography (GC). GC analysis was performed using an InterScience GC-8000 with a DB-1 capillary colunm (30 m x 0.21 mm). GC conditions isotherm at 40°C (2 ntin), ramp at 20°C min to 200°C, isotherm at 200°C (4 min). Injector and detector temperatures were set at 240°C. [Pg.298]

Hilkert, A. W., Douthitt, C. B., Schliiter, H. J. and Brand, W. A. (1999) Isotope ratio monitoring gas chromatography/mass spectrometry of D/H by high temperature conversion isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 13, 1226 1230. [Pg.428]

In the analysis of clinical, biological and environmental samples it is often important to have information on the speciation of the analyte, e.g. metal atoms. Thus an initial sample solution may be subjected to a separation stage using chromatography or electrophoresis. Measurements may, of course, be made on fractions from a fraction collector, but with plasma sources, interfacing in order to provide a continuous monitoring of the column effluent can be possible. This relies upon the ability of the high-temperature plasma to break down the matrix and produce free ions. [Pg.299]


See other pages where Chromatography temperature monitoring is mentioned: [Pg.83]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.2338]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.763]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.707]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.1250]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.514]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.20 ]




SEARCH



Chromatography monitoring

Temperature chromatography

Temperature monitoring

© 2024 chempedia.info