Chromatography, general column efficiency

In addition to water, virtually any organic polar modifier may be used to control solute retention in liquid-solid chromatography. Alcohols, alkyl2aiines, acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran and ethyl acetate in volumes of less than one percent can be incorporated into nonpolar mobile phases to control adsorbent activity. In general, column efficiency declines for alcohol-moderated eluents cogqpared to water-moderated eluent systems. Many of the problems discussed above for water-moderated eluents are true for organic-moderated eluents as well. 

The application of pressure to the liquid phase in liquid chromatography generally increases the separation (see HPLC). Also in PIC improved efficiency of the column is observed if pressure is applied to the mobile phase (Wittmer, Nuessle and Haney Anal Chem 47 1422 1975). 

It appears that the equation introduced by Van Deemter is still the simplest and the most reliable for use in general column design. Nevertheless, all the equations helped to further understand the processes that occur in the column. In particular, in addition to describing dispersion, the Kennedy and Knox equation can also be employed to assess the efficiency of the packing procedure used in the preparation of a chromatography column. 

The injection device is also an important component in the LC system and has been discussed elsewhere (2,18). One type of injector is analogous to sample delivery in gas chromatography, namely syringe injection through a self-sealing septum. While this injection procedure can lead to good column efficiency, it generally is pressure limited, and the septum material can be attacked by the mobile phase solvent. 

In general, the efficiency of the columns used in ion chromatography is limited by the large-sized particles and broad particle size distributions of the resin packings. Resin beads are currently available in the ranges of 20-30, 37-74, and 44—57 pm. 

Chromatographic system (see Chromatography, in the general procedure (621)) The liquid chromatography is equipped with a 280-nm detector and a 4.6 mm x 15-cm column that contains 5-/im packing L7. The flow-rate is about 0.8 ml/min. Chromatograph the System suitability solution, and record the peak responses as directed for Procedure the capacity factor, k , is not less than 6 the column efficiency is not less than 3000 theoretical plates the tailing factor is not more than 1.5 and the relative standard deviation (RSD) for replicate injections is not more than 1%. 

Excellent column efficiency delivered by a large number of theoretical plates (low plate height of about 0.005 mm) is theoretically deduced from the Van Deemter equation which predicts that use of sub 2.5 pm particles does not diminish efficiency at increased flow rates (increased speed of analysis). For more details the reader is referred to general textbooks on chromatography. Therefore, shorter columns (15— 50 and 2.1 mm I.D.) provide sufficient resolution and improved sensitivity within run times of only a few minutes or less. 

Snyder s thorough model [1-5] of gradient elution provides an extremely convenient means to achieve the objectives outlined above. The model uses the general resolution equation for isocratic chromatography in terms adapted to gradient elution. This equation defines resolution between two closely resolved analytes in gradient RP-HPLC as a function of mean column efficiency N, mean selectivity a, and the effective retention factor Aavc experienced by the compounds during the elution process j 1-3,5). 

Two general types of columns are encountered in gas chromatography packed columns and open tubular, or capillary columns. In the past, the vast majority of gas chromatographic analyses used packed columns. For most current applications, packed columns have been replaced by the more efficient and faster open tubular columns. 

The detailed study of the mass transfer kinetics is necessary in certain problems of chromatography in which the column efficiency is low or moderate. Complex models are then useful. The most important ones are the General Rate Model [52,62] and the FOR model (see next Section) [63]. To study the mass transfer kinetics, these models need to consider separately the mass balance of the feed components in the two different fractions of the mobile phase the one that percolates through the bed of the solid phase (column packed with fine particles or monolithic column) and the one that is stagnant inside the pores of the packing material. 

For all these reasons, the mathematical aspects of the theory become much more complex. The mathematics of nonlinear chromatography are so complex that even for a single solute, there is no analytical, closed-form solution available, except with two simplified models, the ideal model and the Thomas model [120]. The ideal model is based upon the assumption of an infinite column efficiency. Its solutions are discussed in detail in Chapters 7 to 9. The Thomas model is based upon the assumptions that there is a slow Langmuir adsorption-desorption kinetics and that there are no other nvass transfer resistances, nor any axial dispersion. The system of equations of this model has been solved by Goldstein [121], and this general solution has been simplified for pulse injection by Wade et al. [122]. In aU other cases, the problem must be solved numerically. The Thomas model is discussed with other kinetic models in Chapter 14 and 16. 

In the equilibrium-dispersive model of chromatography, however, we assume that Eq. 10.4 remains valid. Thus, we use Eq. 10.10 as the mass balance equation of the component, and we assume that the apparent dispersion coefficient Da in Eq. 10.10 is given by Eq. 10.11. We further assume that the HETP is independent of the solute concentration and that it remains the same in overloaded elution as the one meastued in linear chromatography. As shown by the previous discussion this assxunption is an approximation. However, as we have shown recently [6], Eq. 10.4 is an excellent approximation as long as the column efficiency is greater than a few hundred theoretical plates. Thus, the equilibriiun-dispersive model should and does account well for band profiles under almost all the experimental conditions used in preparative chromatography. In the cases in which the model breaks down because the mass transfer kinetics is too slow, and the column efficiency is too low, a kinetic model or, better, the general rate model (Chapter 14) should be used. 

The chief analytical purpose of resorting to chemical reactions is to simplify the solution of specific analytical problems and to extend the area of application of gas chromatography. In analytical reaction GC the column efficiency and the characteristics of the detector used generally remain invariable. However, as a result of chemical conversions of the sample components, derivatives are formed with different separation characteristics and detection limits, which generally leads to changes in the basic chromatographic parameters with respect to the initial compounds. 

---