Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Choice of parameters

It is a common feature of most AI methods that flexibility exists in the way that we can run the algorithm. In the SOM, we can choose the shape and dimensionality of the lattice, the number of nodes, the initial learning rate and how quickly the rate diminishes with cycle number, the size of the initial neighborhood and how it too varies with the number of cycles, the type of function to be used to determine how the updating of weights varies with distance from the winning node, and the stopping criterion. [Pg.80]

With this number of factors influencing the development of the map, it is not possible to specify precisely what their values should be in all cases. The most suitable values will depend on how many features are present in the sample patterns and how diverse they are, but some general guidelines can be given. In the large majority of applications, a two-dimensional map is used these are more flexible than one-dimensional maps, yet are simple [Pg.80]

For any point sequence and a given stretching function, there are several parameters to choose. One is always N, the number of points along the profile. The others [Pg.131]


The choice of parameterization and the design of a discretization method are not independent Some choices of parameters will facilitate symplec-tic/reversible discretization while others may make this task very difficult or render the resulting scheme practically useless because of the computational expense involved. [Pg.351]

The choice of parameter used in the determination of size distribution should include consideration of the information needed in the interpretation of the data. For example, in the case of a manufacturer of paint pigment, the size parameter that best describes the hiding power (performance of the pigment) is the projected area of particles. A powdered catalyst manufacturer is primarily concerned with surface-area equivalence. [Pg.126]

One could view the occurrence of the metric terms in the equations of motion as an annoying complication, but we hold a more positive view. First they assure that whatever the choice of parameters to be used as dynamical variables, that choice will not introduce unphysical artifacts. Second, the metric terms are another component of the theory with potential for providing guiding principles for development of XC models. Those terms also allow the mathematical origin of physical affects to be assigned. [Pg.239]

Recall that in the modification of ATM (MATM, see for more detail Section 8) there is no need for involving the operator R and so a proper choice of parameters r will be independent of constants Cj and Cj both. Here the operator A arranges itself as a sum A = Ai A2. [Pg.709]

Examples of approaches followed by a small selection of the major RM developers are provided below and summarized in Table 3.2. It must be emphasized that these assignments are based on the author s interpretation of approaches described in the literature that placing into one of the approaches defined in this paper is not always feasible due to cross-over between different modes, fusion of ideas from one and another, elimination of steps, selective choices of parameters, modification of parameters, and streamlining of the overall procedure. Variations on a theme are unavoidable. In assigning certification approaches, the numbers refer to the approaches defined above multiple numbers indicate a blending of two or more modes with a asterisk indicating the author s assignment of the dominant mode of certification. [Pg.58]

Having acknowledged a qualitative agreement in experimentally determined change in a and p during adsorption of acceptor particles with theoretical predictions we should comment the correct choice of parameter toe expressions (1.81) and (1.83) makes it feasible to obtain a... [Pg.75]

In practice, the choice of parameters to be refined in the structural models requires a delicate balance between the risk of overfitting and the imposition of unnecessary bias from a rigidly constrained model. When the amount of experimental data is limited, and the model too flexible, high correlations between parameters arise during the least-squares fit, as is often the case with monopole populations and atomic displacement parameters [6], or with exponents for the various radial deformation functions [7]. [Pg.13]

It is perhaps unnecessary to note that the fact that a model, with a suitable choice of parameters, can account for experimental data does not prove that the model is correct or that no physical effects of importance have been left out. Yeager,18 in his review of nontraditional approaches to the study of the metal-electrolyte... [Pg.5]

It is expected that for a certain choice of parameters (that define the r matrix) the adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation matrix becomes identical to the corresponding Wigner rotation matrix. To see the connection, we substitute Eq. (51) in Eq. (28) and assume A(so) to be the unity matrix. [Pg.817]

Fig. 23. Typical variation of the ratio n+ / na of the concentrations of H+ and H°, respectively, across ap-n junction, assuming rapid charge-change processes. The dotted, dashed and full curves were calculated assuming no bias, 2.02 V, and 9.88 V reverse bias, respectively, with a distribution of fixed charge in the junction approximately the same as that of the sample used for Fig. 21 before passivation and with the additional (arbitrary) choice of parameters eT+ = em, ed= -0.25 eV, t o/t0+ =. 001, and T = 200°C. [Pg.333]

In using the Hammett equation it is necessary to make an a priori choice of parameters based on the location of the substituent and a knowledge of the electronic demand in the data set which is to be modelled. If such knowledge is unavailable it is necessary to correlate the data set with each different parameter. The parameter which gives the best fit is then assumed to be the proper choice and the electronic demand associated with it is that of the data set. [Pg.608]

The elements of a continuous group can be characterized by a set of real parameters a, a2,..., an, at least one of which varies continuously over a certain interval. The choice of parameters should be restricted to the minimum number required to characterize all elements of the group. If the number of parameters is finite, the continuous group is called finite and the number of parameters defines the order of the continuous group. [Pg.84]

In Fig. 3 we compare the different components V A, V n, VR, Eq. (7), and VJA, Vf , Vc, Vj, Vt, Eq. (8), of the averaged phenomenological and microscopic TBF potentials in symmetric matter at normal density. One notes that the attractive components, VfA and V , Vf roughly correspond to each other, whereas the repulsive part (V11 vs. Vc) is much larger for the microscopic TBF. With the choice of parameters A and U given above, one would therefore expect a more repulsive behaviour of the microscopic TBF, which is indeed confirmed in the following. [Pg.118]

Numerical results for A (T) and A (T) are shown on the left panel of Fig. 1. The quantities have been rescaled in order to facilitate a comparison with the above relations for Tc and T c. Our results are in reasonable agreement with our estimates. These findings turn out to be insensitive to the actual choice of parameters. [Pg.193]

For the g2SC phase, the typical results for the default choice of parameters H = 400 MeV and r/ = 0.75 are shown in Figure 4. Both the values of the diquark gap (solid line) and the mismatch parameter 5/j, = /i,./2 (dashed line) are plotted. One very unusual property of the shown temperature dependence of the gap is a nonmonotonic behavior. Only at sufficiently high temperatures, the gap is a decreasing function. In the low temperature region, T < 10 MeV, however, it increases with temperature. For comparison, in the same figure, the diquark gap in the model with /je = 0 and /./, = 0 is also shown (dash-dotted line). This latter has the standard BCS shape. [Pg.232]

As indicated above, early attempts to use semiempirical methods had proved unsatisfactory, due to the wrong choice of parameters. A similar situation had existed in the Pople 14> treatment of conjugated molecules using the Huckel o, ir approximation the parameters in this were chosen to fit spectroscopic data and with these the method gave poor estimates of ground state properties. Subsequent work in our laboratories has shown JS) that this approach can lead to estimates of heats of atomization and molecular geometries that are in almost perfect agreement with experiment if the parameters are chosen to reproduce these quantities. [Pg.8]

The purpose of the trial also affects the choice of degradation agents and the parameters used to monitor degradation. For comparison and quality control purposes, single agents are most frequently used. For prediction purposes multiple agents are more likely to be representative of service, but at the same time they make extrapolation rules more complicated. The parameters measured in trials to predict lifetime must be those critical to service, but in many instances of comparison or quality checks the choice of parameter can be heavily influenced by experimental convenience. [Pg.60]

For the choice of parameters used here, the simple pathway gives rise to bistability and hysteresis. In particular, Fig. 22 depicts the nullclines for different values of the maximal ATP consumption rate V ,. The corresponding steady states, given as the solution of the equation... [Pg.174]

VAN AKEN et al. 0) and EDWARDS et al. (2) made clear that two sets of fundamental parameters are useful in describing vapor-liquid equilibria of volatile weak electrolytes, (1) the dissociation constant(s) K of acids, bases and water, and (2) the Henry s constants H of undissociated volatile molecules. A thermodynamic model can be built incorporating the definitions of these parameters and appropriate equations for mass balance and electric neutrality. It is complete if deviations to ideality are taken into account. The basic framework developped by EDWARDS, NEWMAN and PRAUSNITZ (2) (table 1) was used by authors who worked on volatile electrolyte systems the difference among their models are in the choice of parameters and in the representation of deviations to ideality. [Pg.173]

An application to one binary mixture of a volatile electrolyte and water will illustrate the choice of parameters H and K, an approach is proposed to represent the vapor-liquid equilibrium in the whole range of concentration. Ternary mixtures with one acid and one base lead to the formation of salts and high ionic strengths can be reached. There, it was found useful to take into account... [Pg.173]

If the measured and calculated concentrations are designated as Cexp(x, f) and Ccaic(x, t) respectively, then the best choice of parameters (i. e., A, B, a, b, and Khc) are those which minimize the following function ... [Pg.211]

In contrast to the examples in Chapter 7, where in all cases the BI, 0A. was for only one active site, hence there were no A-A cooperativities. Here, we have m active sites and m regulatory sites. Therefore, for the particular choice of parameters in (8.8.10), we expect positive cooperativity between A and A as well as between R and R, but negative cooperativity between A and R. [Pg.276]

The exact binding data are obtained with the choice of parameters... [Pg.330]

The hermitian metric and the quaternion module structure on M descends to Mp. In particular, M " is a hyper-Kahler manifold. There is a natural action on M " of a Lie group Ur(F) = rifcU(Ffc). This action preserves the hyper-Kahler structure. The corresponding hyper-Kahler moment map is p o o where i is the inclusion M " C M, /r is the hyper-Kahler moment map for U(F)-action on M, and p is the orthogonal projection to 0 u Vk) in u(F). We denote this hyper-Kahler moment map also by p = (/ri, /T2, / s)- This increases the flexibility of the choice of parameters. Take = (Co> Cn > Cn) ( = 1) 2, 3) such that (I is a scalar matrix in u(14)- Then we can consider a hyper-Kahler quotient... [Pg.47]


See other pages where Choice of parameters is mentioned: [Pg.68]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.654]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.717]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.688]    [Pg.1247]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.287]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.85 , Pg.86 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.85 , Pg.86 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info