Chemistry, kinds quantum

Computational chemistry and quantum chemistry have enlisted the computer and software in an entirely new kind of experimental methodology. Computational chemists, for example, don t study matter directly. In the past, chemists who wanted to determine molecular properties chose their instrumentation, prepared a sample, observed the reactions of the sample, and deduced the molecule s properties. Computational chemists now choose their computer and software packages and get their information by modeling and mathematical analyses. 

This case study will describe the use of computers in the undergraduate quantum chemistry course at two levels. The first level uses the computer to solve routine, small-scale quantum mechanical problems on a day-to-day basis. These are the kind of problems that appear at the back of the chapter in physical chemistry or quantum chemistry texts, or in compilations of quantum mechanical exercises. The current generation of students generally attack these problems with hand-held calculators of various levels of computational sophistication. Earlier generations struggled with slide rules, math tables, and mechanical calculators. 

This fear of the reduction of chemistry to physics has recently resurfaced in the form of a revival of the philosophy of chemistry in the United States. In 1999, the chemist Eric Scerri founded a new journal. Foundations of Chemistry, addressing precisely these kinds of issues. Indeed, the tide echoed that of the famous series of publications by the logical positivists in the US, Foundations of the Unity of Science, which, symptomatically, had nothing to say about chemistry. Eric Scerri himself sees the philosophy of chemistry as the major weapon in the fight against the reduction of chemistry to quantum mechanics, the goal being to demonstrate that the foundations of chemistry are to be found in chemistry itself and not in physics. 

Optical metiiods, in both bulb and beam expermrents, have been employed to detemiine tlie relative populations of individual internal quantum states of products of chemical reactions. Most connnonly, such methods employ a transition to an excited electronic, rather than vibrational, level of tlie molecule. Molecular electronic transitions occur in the visible and ultraviolet, and detection of emission in these spectral regions can be accomplished much more sensitively than in the infrared, where vibrational transitions occur. In addition to their use in the study of collisional reaction dynamics, laser spectroscopic methods have been widely applied for the measurement of temperature and species concentrations in many different kinds of reaction media, including combustion media [31] and atmospheric chemistry [32]. 

My project is not to critique of the power of quantum chemistry that I regard to be a self-evident fact. But with the triumph of quantum mechanics I believe there has been some tendency to exaggerate its success, especially on the part of some practicing quantum chemists and physicists. As a philosopher of chemistry I have the luxury of being able to examine the field as an outsider and of asking the kinds of questions which true practitioners might not even contemplate. The approach I take in this article is a philosophical one in the sense that I am concerned with principles and not just with technical details, although I try to be as accurate as possible with the latter. 

This type of basis functions is frequently used in popular quantum chemistry packages. We shall discuss the way to evaluate different kinds of matrix elements in this basis set that are often used in quantum chemistry calculation. 

The bond that developed between quantum physics and quantum chemistry, that led to the award of a big chemistry prize to the physicist Walter Kohn in 1998, developed not without trial. Here I give an account of it. An element in this bond has been a friendship between Walter Kohn and me. My having reached 80 first, he has already kindly spoken of this [1], Now it is my turn. 

If quantum theory is to be used as a chemical tool, on the same kind of basis as, say, n.m.r. or mass spectrometry, one must be able to carry out calculations of high accuracy for quite complex molecules without excessive cost in computation time. Until recently such a goal would have seemed quite unattainable and numerous calculations of dubious value have been published on the basis that nothing better was possible. Our work has shown that this view is too pessimistic semiempirical SCF MO treatments, if properly applied, can already give results of sufficient accuracy to be of chemical value and the possibilities of further improvement seem unlimited. There can therefore be little doubt that we are on the threshold of an era where quantum chemistry will serve as a standard tool in studying the reactions and other properties of molecules, thus bringing nearer the fruition of Dirac s classic statement, that with the development of quantum theory chemistry has become an exercise in applied mathematics. 

Given the emphasis of earlier chapters in this book, it is crucial to emphasize that the kinds of chemical problems to which the methods of quantum mechanics were extended in the 1930s were first and foremost the ones that earlier had concerned the chemists of the London-Manchester school, as discussed in chapters 7 and 8. Consequently, it was in England as well as in the United States that quantum chemistry first thrived. 

It is well known that the flotation of sulphides is an electrochemical process, and the adsorption of collectors on the surface of mineral results from the electrons transfer between the mineral surface and the oxidation-reduction composition in the pulp. According to the electrochemical principles and the semiconductor energy band theories, we know that this kind of electron transfer process is decided by electronic structure of the mineral surface and oxidation-reduction activity of the reagent. In this chapter, the flotation mechanism and electron transferring mechanism between a mineral and a reagent will be discussed in the light of the quantum chemistry calculation and the density fimction theory (DFT) as tools. 

In the next two subsections, we describe collections of calculations that have been used to probe the physical accuracy of plane-wave DFT calculations. An important feature of plane-wave calculations is that they can be applied to bulk materials and other situations where the localized basis set approaches of molecular quantum chemistry are computationally impractical. To develop benchmarks for the performance of plane-wave methods for these properties, they must be compared with accurate experimental data. One of the reasons that benchmarking efforts for molecular quantum chemistry have been so successful is that very large collections of high-precision experimental data are available for small molecules. Data sets of similar size are not always available for the properties of interest in plane-wave DFT calculations, and this has limited the number of studies that have been performed with the aim of comparing predictions from plane-wave DFT with quantitative experimental information from a large number of materials. There are, of course, many hundreds of comparisons that have been made with individual experimental measurements. If you follow our advice and become familiar with the state-of-the-art literature in your particular area of interest, you will find examples of this kind. Below, we collect a number of examples where efforts have been made to compare the accuracy of plane-wave DFT calculations against systematic collections of experimental data. 

These attempts may be called thermodynamic semi-theoretical approaches . They concern mostly the simplest kind of bonding, namely the metallic bond. The underlying hypothesis is that the contributions of different outer orbitals (7 s, 6 d, 5 f) in some chosen thermodynamic or structural property can be linearly combined, the coefficients of this linear combination being related to the degree of participation of the different orbitals in the bonding an approach clearly related to the molecular orbital approach of quantum chemistry and to the hybridization concept, and which had been previously employed in other transition metals and to the rare-earth metallic systems " (for a criticism of this approach, see Ref. 6). The chosen thermodynamic and structural properties are, therefore, bonding indicators , since they will reflect contributions introduced by the fact that the wavefunctions of bonding electrons have mixed orbital characters. 

This work is supported by RFBR grants Nos 04-03-32146 and 04-03-32206. The authors are thankful to Profs. Paul Ziesche, Lothar Fritsche, Francesc Illas, and Marc Casida for sending (p)reprints of their work, to Profs. LG. Kaplan, E. Ludena, J.-P. Julien and Dr. V.I. Pupyshev for valuable discussions. The organizers of the 9-th European Workshop on Quantum Systems in Chemistry and Physics (QSCP-9) at Les Houches (France) are acknowledged for a kind support extended to A.L.T. 

RHC whishes to express his sincere thanks to Professor H. F. Schaefer III for his kind hospitality at the Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, University of Georgia, where part of this work was prepared. The Argentine authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from UBACYT. JCF acknowledges the support of the International and Chemistry Divisions of NSF (INT-0071032) that have supported his collaboration with the University of Buenos Aires. 

---