Chemisorption bond, theories

The Characterization and Properties of Small Metal Particles. Y. Takasu and A. M. Bradshaw, Surf. Defect. Prop. Solids p. 401 1978). 2. Cluster Model Theory. R. P. Messmer, in "The Nature of the Chemisorption Bond G. Ertl and T. Rhodin, eds. North-Holland Publ., Amsterdam, 1978. 3. Clusters and Surfaces. E. L. Muetterties, T. N. Rhodin, E. Band, C. F. Brucker, and W. R. Pretzer, Cornell National Science Center, Ithaca, New York, 1978. 4. Determination of the Properties of Single Atom and Multiple Atom Clusters. J. F. Hamilton, in "Chemical Experimentation Under Extreme Conditions (B. W. Rossiter, ed.) (Series, "Physical Methods of Organic Chemistry ), Wiley (Interscience), New York (1978). 

If molecules or atoms form a chemical bond with the surface upon adsorption, we call this chemisorption. To describe the chemisorption bond we need to briefly review a simplified form of molecular orbital theory. This is also necessary to appreciate, at least qualitatively, how a catalyst works. As described in Qiapter 1, the essence of catalytic action is often that it assists in breaking strong intramolecular bonds at low temperatures. We aim to explain how this happens in a simplified, qualitative electronic picture. 

The theoretical chemical application of surface chemical bonding theory, highlighted next, is related to formal chemisorption theory as developed in surface physics, but concentrates on quantum chemical concepts as the electron distribution over bonding and antibonding orbital fragments [5, 6]. It will be seen that both approaches complement each other. The notion of a surface molecule relates to the surface physicists concept of surface state. 

A massive electron transfer between the metal particles and the supports (or promoters) and the penetration of an electric field into the metal are thus not realistic ideas on the through-the-metal interaction. However, there is one mechanism for such an interaction which is well supported by the quantum theory of chemisorption when a covalent chemisorption bond is formed, it causes periodic variation (with the distance) in the chemisorption bond strength in its environment. At the nearest site a repulsion is felt, on the next-nearest an attraction, etc. [46a]. However, it is important to realize how strong this interaction is. A realistic estimate, based on observations of the field ion emission images, shows that these interactions are comparable in their strength to the physical (condensation) van der Waals forces [46b]. 

At the end of this section let us cite the opinion of Sachtler 461), on the subjects in question work function, Volta potential, photoelectrical emission, field emission microscopy, film electroconductivity, magnetic properties of small particles, and IR spectra indicate, according to Sachtler, that the chemisorption bond between the metal and the adsorbate is similar to the bond in the bulk, with both bond strengths differing by not more than 10%. In chemisorption the metal atom partly loses its metallic properties the result is a change of electroconductivity and magnetizing ability. The Me—Me bond is broken and a bond with the adsorbate is formed a mobility of the metal atoms on the surface is the result. All these considerations are consistent with the conclusions from the multiplet theory. 

The basic thermodynamic theory leading to the Gibbs expression that describes this quantitatively will be given in chapter 5. As the surface atoms are activated with respect to the bulk, there is an extra energy gain if molecules or atoms adsorb. Figure (3.2) illustrates the three steps which can be considered to constitute the chemisorptive bond strength for an atom coordinated to one surface atom ... 

Theoretical description of the chemisorption bond and calculation of adsorption energies are nowadays mainly based on application of density functional theory (DFT) [28]. This approach has developed to a computational strategy of comparable accuracy to the traditional correlated quantum chemical methods, but at much lower costs, and is now widely used to calculate bond energies to fairly high accuracy comparable to experimental data [29], but sometimes also at variance [30]. 

Classical chemical bonding theory relates trends in energies with the free valence of interacting fragments. In chemisorption, this gives a relation between free adsorbate valence and coordination to the metal surface. 

For a meaningful discussion of electronic factors in catalysis it is necessary to briefly review the nature of chemisorption bonds. Two theories of the metallic state have been accepted, the electron band theory and the valence bond theory. Both theories recognize the existence of two separate functions for valence electrons in metals one function is to bind the atoms together and the other is to account for magnetic and conductive properties. In the electron band theory, as particularly applied to the transition metals, the s-electron energy band is broad with a low maximum... 

Two opposing theories on the nature of chemisorption bonds have been supported in recent years. Trapnell has subscribed to the view that the chemisorption bond is a covalence between electrons from the adsorbate and unpaired electrons in atomic d-orbitals. This concept easily interprets the high chemisorption activity of the transition metals and the decrease of magnetic susceptibility which can follow chemisorption. The alternative view, supported by Dowden, is that the metal-adsorbate bond is essentially similar to the metal-metal bond, i.e., a free d-s-p-orbital is employed. " In this theory, the role of unpaired d-electrons is that of forming an intermediate without which the final state cannot be attained, unless a high activation energy is overcome or the molecule is previously dissociated to atoms. 

The theory that the chemisorption bond is a covalence involving partially filled d-orbitals is not subject to quantitative test by calculation. Experimental correlations of heats of adsorption with the percentage d-character of the metal, particularly for adsorption of hydrogen on the transition metals, have led to taking the percentage d-character as a measure of unavailability of electrons in atomic d-orbitals and thus the expected strength of the chemisorption bond. For the alternative view in which the surface bond is... 

Chemisorption of H on simple metals and on transition metals has been studied theoretically using approaches such as molecular orbit theory, valence bond theory, density functional theory, cluster calculations (a detailed description up to 1980 can he found in Smith, 1980), and effective medium theory (N rskov, 1984). An extension of the effective medium theory, the so-called embedding atom method - originally developed to study the embrittlement problem - was shown to yield very valuable results for H on metals, particularly for the surface relaxation and the H adsorption sites including subsurface sites (see Pd) (Daw and Baskes, 1984). 

O showed a profound difference in CO2 formation rate [M.J.P. Hopstaken and J.W. Niemantsverdriet, J. Chem. Phys. 113 (2000) 5457]. Hence, care should be taken to interpret apparent structure sensitivity found under normal operating conditions of high pressure and coverage in terms of the intrinsic reactivity of sites. From the theory of chemisorption and reaction discussed in Chapter 6 it is hard to imagine how the concept of structure insensitivity can be maintained on the level of individual sites on surfaces, as atoms in different geometries always possess different bonding characteristics. 

The second part of the paper Is devoted to some aspects of the current status of the theory of chemisorption There, in particular, Che adsorption of water and ammonia will be studied and discussed Through the theory a qualitative understanding of the bonding of these molecules to surfaces Is achieved which Is In agreement with Che experimental observations ... 

Numerous quantum mechanic calculations have been carried out to better understand the bonding of nitrogen oxide on transition metal surfaces. For instance, the group of Sautet et al have reported a comparative density-functional theory (DFT) study of the chemisorption and dissociation of NO molecules on the close-packed (111), the more open (100), and the stepped (511) surfaces of palladium and rhodium to estimate both energetics and kinetics of the reaction pathways [75], The structure sensitivity of the adsorption was found to correlate well with catalytic activity, as estimated from the calculated dissociation rate constants at 300 K. The latter were found to agree with numerous experimental observations, with (111) facets rather inactive towards NO dissociation and stepped surfaces far more active, and to follow the sequence Rh(100) > terraces in Rh(511) > steps in Rh(511) > steps in Pd(511) > Rh(lll) > Pd(100) > terraces in Pd (511) > Pd (111). The effect of the steps on activity was found to be clearly favorable on the Pd(511) surface but unfavorable on the Rh(511) surface, perhaps explaining the difference in activity between the two metals. The influence of... 

In the Introduction the problem of construction of a theoretical model of the metal surface was briefly discussed. If a model that would permit the theoretical description of the chemisorption complex is to be constructed, one must decide which type of the theoretical description of the metal should be used. Two basic approaches exist in the theory of transition metals (48). The first one is based on the assumption that the d-elec-trons are localized either on atoms or in bonds (which is particularly attractive for the discussion of the surface problems). The other is the itinerant approach, based on the collective model of metals (which was particularly successful in explaining the bulk properties of metals). The choice between these two is not easy. Even in contemporary solid state literature the possibility of d-electron localization is still being discussed (49-51). Examples can be found in the literature that discuss the following problems high cohesion energy of transition metals (52), their crystallographic structure (53), magnetic moments of the constituent atoms in alloys (54), optical and photoemission properties (48, 49), and plasma oscillation losses (55). 

It has also to be remembered that the band model is a theory of the bulk properties of the metal (magnetism, electrical conductivity, specific heat, etc.), whereas chemisorption and catalysis depend upon the formation of bonds between surface metal atoms and the adsorbed species. Hence, modern theories of chemisorption have tended to concentrate on the formation of bonds with localized orbitals on surface metal atoms. Recently, the directional properties of the orbitals emerging at the surface, as discussed by Dowden (102) and Bond (103) on the basis of the Good-enough model, have been used to interpret the chemisorption behavior of different crystal faces (104, 105). A more elaborate theoretical treatment of the chemisorption process by Grimley (106) envisages the formation of a surface compound with localized metal orbitals, and in this case a weak interaction is allowed with the electrons in the metal. 

The combination of fully occupied bonding and antibonding orbitals does not lead to bonding between A and B (In chemisorption theory it is sometimes said that the interaction between A and B is repulsive). 

Continuity equation electrochemical reactor, 30 311 mass transport, 30 312 Continuous-flow stirred-tanlt reactor, 31 189 Continuous reactor, 33 4-5 Continuous stirred-tank reactor, 27 74-77 ControUed-atmosphere studies, choice of materials for construction, 31 188 Conversion theory, 27 50, 51 Coordinatimi number, platinum, 30 265 Coordinative bonding, energy of, 34 158 Coordinative chemisorption on silicon, 34 155-158... 

---