Chemical interferences atomic fluorescence spectrometry

Atomic fluorescence flame spectrometry is receiving increased attention as a potential tool for the trace analysis of inorganic ions. Studies to date have indicated that limits of detection comparable or superior to those currently obtainable with atomic absorption or flame emission methods are frequently possible for elements whose emission lines are in the ultraviolet. The use of a continuum source, such as the high-pressure xenon arc, has been successful, although the limits of detection obtainable are not usually as low as those obtained with intense line sources. However, the xenon source can be used for the analysis of several elements either individually or by scanning a portion of the spectruin. Only chemical interferences are of concern they appear to be qualitatively similar for both atomic absorption and atomic fluorescence. With the current development of better sources and investigations into devices other than flames for sample introduction, further improvements in atomic fluorescence spectroscopy are to be expected. 

Hydride generation techniques are superior to direct solution analysis in several ways. However, the attraction offered by enhanced detection limits is offset by the relatively few elements to which the technique can be applied, potential interferences, as well as limitations imposed on the sample preparation procedures in that strict adherence to valence states and chemical form must be maintained. Cold-vapor generation of mercury currently provides the most desirable means of quantitation of this element, although detection limits lower than AAS can be achieved when it is coupled to other means of detection (e.g., nondispersive atomic fluorescence or micro-wave induced plasma atomic emission spectrometry). 

Interferences are physical or chemical processes that cause the signal from the analyte in the sample to be higher or lower than the signal from an equivalent standard. Interferences can therefore cause positive or negative errors in quantitative analysis. There are two major classes of interferences in AAS, spectral interferences and nonspectral interferences. Nonspectral interferences are those that affect the formation of analyte free atoms. Nonspectral interferences include chemical interference, ionization interference, and solvent effects (or matrix interference). Spectral interferences cause the amount of light absorbed to be erroneously high due to absorption by a species other than the analyte atom. While all techniques suffer from interferences to some extent, AAS is much less prone to spectral interferences and nonspectral interferences than atomic anission spectrometry and X-ray fluorescence (XRF), the other major optical atomic spectroscopic techniques. 

Several methods are available for the determination of total aluminum in biological and other materials. Chemical and physicochemical methods are in most practical situations insensitive and inaccurate X-ray fluorescence is specific but lacks sensitivity neutron activation analysis is complex and subject to interferences, although it is a very sensitive technique. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy is not very sensitive but useful to get information on speciation [33]. Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) is the most widely used technique and can produce reliable results, provided that the matrix effects are recognized and corrected. Savory and Wills [19] reviewed chemical and physicochemical methods for the determination of aluminum in biological materials, e.g. X-ray fluorescence, neutron activation analysis, atomic emission spectrometry, flame emission, inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy, and AAS. 

---