Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ceramics fracture toughness values

Fracture strength, of vitreous silica, 22 428 Fracture tests, 1 514 Fracture toughness ceramics, 5 619-623 of silicon carbide, 22 528t of vitreous silica, 22 429 Fracture toughness tests, 10 427 Fracture toughness values... [Pg.380]

Composites provide an atPactive alternative to the various metal-, polymer- and ceramic-based biomaterials, which all have some mismatch with natural bone properties. A comparison of modulus and fracture toughness values for natural bone provide a basis for the approximate mechanical compatibility required for arUficial bone in an exact structural replacement, or to stabilize a bone-implant interface. A precise matching requires a comparison of all the elastic stiffness coefficients (see the generalized Hooke s Law in Section 5.4.3.1). From Table 5.15 it can be seen that a possible approach to the development of a mechanically compatible artificial bone material... [Pg.529]

Fracture toughness values for different ceramics may depend on technique used to measure them. [Pg.299]

In particular, the Vickers indentation method seems favourable to compare the response of inorganic matrix composites containing CNTs to contact loads due to its simplicity and easy sample preparation and test operation. It should be noted that the fracture toughness values shown in Table 1 were all determined by the Vickers indentation method as this has been the accepted practice in the field in the last years and in most cases the fracture toughness of CNT/ceramic composites has been obtained by this method. [Pg.71]

The fracture toughness of a material defines its resistance to crack propagation. Most ceramics have low fracture toughness values compared with other materials,... [Pg.195]

It is hoped that the ceramic community will begin using the new standard methods, but this will probably be a gradual process. Rudimentary indentation methods will continue to have some allure, no matter how dubious the quality of the data. Hopefully the ceramic community will recognize the value of refined standard test methods and the methods will restore some long overdue credibility to ceramic fracture toughness data. [Pg.558]

However, flexural strength, strain-to-failine, and fracture toughness values of HA-ceramics are significantly less than those of bone, whereas the elastic modulus is much higher [8, 9], These mechanical mismatches influence the reliability of ceramics when implanted into the bone tissue. To improve the mechanical compatibility, a composite approach may be promising. The combination of different materials within a composite structure may lead to a composite material that reveals specific physical, chemical and/or mechanical properties, particularly resulted from a synergy principal. [Pg.134]

As discussed in Chapters 12 and 13, ceramic materials are inherently resilient to oxidation and deterioration at elevated temperatures were it not for their disposition to brittle fracture, some of these materials would be ideal candidates for use in high-temperature and severe-stress applications, specifically for components in automobile and aircraft gas turbine engines. Fracture toughness values for ceramic materials are low... [Pg.660]

Fracture Toughness. The fracture criterion was defined by a critical value of the crack tip stress intensity, known as the fracture toughness. Ceramics often fail ia pure tension, designated mode I, and Kj replaces ia equation 6. Thus die appHed tensile stress at which fracture... [Pg.320]

There are two main techniques used to measure the fracture toughness of ceramics fracture stress and hardness indentation. The former measures the load to fracture of a pre-cracked specimen using a single edge notched beam (SENB) or a chevron notched beam (CNB) sample. The main drawback of this technique is ensuring that the crack tip is atomically sharp. The second method uses the crack formed at the corners of the indentation produced during a Vickers indentation hardness test. This technique is rapid and relatively inexpensive. However, the toughness values measured are those of the surface, unlike the values obtained by fracture of the pre-cracked beams which are a measure of the bulk material properties. [Pg.46]


See other pages where Ceramics fracture toughness values is mentioned: [Pg.320]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.99]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.262 , Pg.896 ]




SEARCH



Ceramic toughness

Ceramics values

Tough

Tough fracture

© 2024 chempedia.info