Causal analysis defined

Regression analysis defines the mathematical relationship between the response variable Y and the explanatory variable X. We cannot, however, automatically assume that there is an underlying biological cause-and-effect relationship between these variables. Conclusions about causal relationships can only be drawn based on some insight into the natural phenomenon being investigated, backed up where possible by statistical testing. 

This chapter provides a broad introduction to the state of the art in general causal inference methods with an eye toward safety analysis. In brief, the estimation roadmap begins with the construction of a formal structural causal model of the data that allows the definition of intervention-specific counterfactual outcomes and causal effects defined as functionals of the distributions of these counterfactuals. The establishment of an identifiability result allows the causal parameter to be recast as an esti-mand within a statistical model for the observed data, thus translating the causal question of interest into an exercise in statistical estimation and inference. This exercise is nontrivial in (typically nonparametric) statistical models that are large enough to contain the true data-generating distribution. 

The FTA is the most commonly nsed technique for causal analysis in risk and reliability studies (Nighot, 2003). It should be undertaken as soon as engineers start defining system architecture as it provides the mechanism for them to evaluate the integrity of that architecture. As illustrated in Fig. 4.1, it should be a live document reflecting the evolving system architecture at all times, with an emphasis on ensuring that no common mode vulnerabilities are introduced or missed. 

Computational methods have been applied to determine the connections in systems that are not well-defined by canonical pathways. This is either done by semi-automated and/or curated literature causal modeling [1] or by statistical methods based on large-scale data from expression or proteomic studies (a mostly theoretical approach is given by reference [2] and a more applied approach is in reference [3]). Many methods, including clustering, Bayesian analysis and principal component analysis have been used to find relationships and "fingerprints" in gene expression data [4]. 

Since, in this causal model, the extended wave 0 represents a real physical finite wave with well-defined energy, it seems natural to represent it by a suitable mathematical form. At the time when de Broglie put forth his causal interpretation of quantum mechanics, it was necessary for him to construct a finite wave using the Fourier analysis, namely, the multiplicity of harmonic plane waves, infinite in space and time, summing up and giving origin to a wavepacket. 

In a meta-analysis, one might define a causal effect rpo, for each study and define the desired causal effect as a weighted average of these study-specific causal effects, The weights might be a simple function of the... 

If the causal model did not include the identifiability assumptions, then it is unknown if /q equals the desired causal effect ipo- A variety of sensitivity analyses could be employed, which involve posing a new causal model that still allows identification of the desired causal effect but that represents a deviation from the original causal model. Such a causal model is indexed by a sensitivity parameter a that is assumed known, and for each a-specific causal model, one redevelops the identifiability result and estimator with corresponding statistical inference (Robins et al., 1999 Scharfstein et al., 1999 Rotnitzky et al., 2001). In a recent article by Dfaz and van der Laan (2013), we develop a much simpler sensitivity analysis that simply defines the sensitivity parameter as the bias il o - o or an upper bound thereof, and for each plausible value of this bias, it reports the estimator and possibly conservative confidence interval for the causal effect rpS. The latter method relies on fewer assumptions, and does not involve any extra work. 

Now there is such a tool that can execute the analysis of FTTD with six types of gates causal XOR, causal AND, generalization XOR, generalization AND, causal priority AND, and generalization priority AND ones for defined values of time parameters. 

This section presents the theoretical material required for the methodology concepts and the proof of its effectiveness. A very brief review of model inversion is first recalled. Then the definitions of relative orders, orders of zeros at infinity, and essential orders are presented. These notions are also reviewed in the bond graph language for defining structural analysis in this framework. In particular the concepts of power lines and causal paths are defined. They will be used for checking the structural criteria of invertibility and differentiability. 

The previous concepts of structural analysis are now reviewed in the context of the bond graph language. First, the notions attached to power lines and causal paths are defined and then used for determining the relative orders, the orders of the zeros at infinity, and the essential orders. All the following definitions are given for the bond graph representation of an LTI system (A, B, C, D). 

---