Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Catalytic surfaces, adsorption

The results obtained showed, again, that the form of the rate equations and the values of their constants, obtained by the study of isolated reactions, are valid also in the coupled system. This was also confirmed by the observed agreement between the calculated and the experimental integral data (94)- Kinetic results and the analysis of the effect of reaction products revealed that adsorption of the reaction components was competitive and that all the compounds involved in the three reactions were adsorbed on the same sites of the catalytic surface. [Pg.37]

From the results of this kinetic study and from the values of the adsorption coefficients listed in Table IX, it can be judged that both reactions of crotonaldehyde as well as the reaction of butyraldehyde proceed on identical sites of the catalytic surface. The hydrogenation of crotyl alcohol and its isomerization, which follow different kinetics, most likely proceed on other sites of the surface. From the form of the integral experimental dependences in Fig. 9 it may be assumed, for similar reasons as in the hy-drodemethylation of xylenes (p. 31) or in the hydrogenation of phenol, that the adsorption or desorption of the reaction components are most likely faster processes than surface reactions. [Pg.45]

From the study of the influencing of single reactions by products and by other added substances and from the analysis of mutual influencing of reactions in coupled systems, the following conclusions can be drawn concerning adsorption of the reaction components. (1) With the exception of crotyl alcohol on the platinum-iron-silica gel catalyst, all the substances present in the coupled system, i.e. reactants, intermediate products, and final products, always adsorbed on the same sites of the catalytic surface (competitive adsorption). This nonspecificity was established also in our other studies (see Section IV.F.2) and was stated also by, for example, Smith and Prater (32), (2) The adsorption of starting reactants and the desorption of the intermediate and final products appeared in our studies always as faster, relative to the rate of chemical transformations of adsorbed substances on the surface of the catalyst. [Pg.49]

His researches and those of his pupils led to his formulation in the twenties of the concept of active catalytic centers and the heterogeneity of catalytic and adsorptive surfaces. His catalytic studies were supplemented by researches carried out simultaneously on kinetics of homogeneous gas reactions and photochemistry. The thirties saw Hugh Taylor utilizing more and more of the techniques developed by physicists. Thermal conductivity for ortho-para hydrogen analysis resulted in his use of these species for surface characterization. The discovery of deuterium prompted him to set up production of this isotope by electrolysis on a large scale of several cubic centimeters. This gave him and others a supply of this valuable tracer for catalytic studies. For analysis he invoked not only thermal conductivity, but infrared spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. To ex-... [Pg.444]

Whitaker, S, Transient Diffusion, Adsorption and Reaction in Porous Catalysts The Reaction Controlled, Quasi-Steady Catalytic Surface, Chemical Engineering Science 41, 3015, 1986. [Pg.623]

The performance of various solvents can be explained with the help of the role of these solvents in the reaction. These solvents help in keeping teth benzene and hydrogen peroxide in one phase. This helps in the easy transport of both the reactants to the active sites of the catalyst. The acetonitrile, and acetone adsorption data on these catalysts (Fig. 6), suggests that acetonitrile has a greater affinity to the catalytic surface than acetone. There by acetonitrile is more effective in transporting the reactants to the catalyst active sites. At the same time, they also help the products in desorbing and vacating the active sites. [Pg.280]

Several techniques for VOC removal have been investigated such as thermal incineration, catalytic oxidation, condensation, absorption, bio-filtration, adsorption, and membrane separation. VOCs are present in many types of waste gases and are often removed by adsorption [1]. Activated carbon (AC) is commonly used as an adsorbent of gases and vapors because of its developed surface area and large pore volumes [2]. Modification techniques for AC have been used to increase surface adsorption and hence removal capacity, as well as to improve selectivity to organic compounds [3]. [Pg.457]

Thus, it was established that adsorption of metal hydroxide species on the surface of the substrate provides a nucleation layer which is chemically converted to the metal chalcogenide. The forming metal chalcogenide layer acts then as a catalytic surface for subsequent anion and cation adsorption. [Pg.135]

For potentials higher than 0.5 V vs. RHE, the formation of adsorbed oxygen species at Ru as well as at Pt will block the catalytic surface, leading to a decrease in the methanol adsorption kinetics. Therefore, in a potential range higher than 0.5 V vs. RHE, the kinetics of methanol oxidation is optimized at a Ru-poor catalyst, because methanol adsorption is not blocked and because the presence of Ru provides the extra oxygen atom needed to complete the oxidation of adsorbed CO to CO2. [Pg.352]

The catalytic surface being saturated to a large extent by N02 adsorbed species. NO and N02 are detected in the exhaust stream, The higher the reaction temperature, the more efficient the progressive adsorption of N02 and the oxidation of nitrites into nitrates. [Pg.131]

A triatomic molecule undergoes the reaction, A3 B + C, in contact with a catalytic surface. It dissociates completely on adsorption. Write rate equations for the two cases (a) Surface reaction rate controlling, adsorptive equilibrium of all participants maintained (b) Rate of desorption of substance B controlling, surface reaction equilibrium maintained. [Pg.675]

Pyridine. Pyridine and its methyl substituted derivatives (picolines and lutidines) were found to polymerize electrochemically and, under certain circumstances, catalytically. This behavior was not expected because usually pyridine undergoes electrophilic substitution and addition slowly, behaving like a deactivated benzene ring. The interaction of pyridine with a Ni(100) surface did not indicate any catalytic polymerization. Adsorption of pyridine below 200 K resulted in pyridine adsorbing with the ring parallel to the surface. The infrared spectrum of pyridine adsorbed at 200 K showed no evidence of either ring vibrations or CH stretches (Figure 5). Desorption of molecular pyridine occurred at 250 K, and above 300 K pyridine underwent a... [Pg.92]

Ammonia TPD is very simple and versatile. The use of propylamine as a probe molecule is starting to gain some popularity since it decomposes at the acid site to form ammonia and propene directly. This eliminates issues with surface adsorption observed with ammonia. The conversion of the TPD data into acid strength distribution can be influenced by the heating rate and can be subjective based on the selection of desorption temperatures for categorizing acid strength. Since basic molecules can adsorb on both Bronsted and Lewis acid sites, the TPD data may not necessarily be relevant for the specific catalytic reaction of interest because of the inability to distinguish between Bronsted and Lewis acid sites. [Pg.158]

The chapter Chiral Modification of Catalytic Surfaces [84] in Design of Heterogeneous Catalysts New Approaches based on Synthesis, Characterization and Modelling summarizes the fundamental research related to the chiral hydrogenation of a-ketoesters on cinchona-modified platinum catalysts and that of [3-ketoesters on tartaric acid-modified nickel catalysts. Emphasis is placed on the adsorption of chiral modifiers as well as on the interaction of the modifier and the organic reactant on catalytic surfaces. [Pg.259]

Now consider another effect which also follows from the theory. This is the dependence of the specific (per unit surface) adsorptivity and catalytic activity on the dimensions of the sample, i.e., on the degree of disperseness of the catalyst. [Pg.247]


See other pages where Catalytic surfaces, adsorption is mentioned: [Pg.171]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.2173]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.541]   


SEARCH



Surfaces catalytic

© 2024 chempedia.info