Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Catalyst performance reaction rate equation

In order to validate the reaction rate equation, additional experiments were performed in a fixed bed (dinner = 7 mm, L = 100mm) filled with 3.1 g of the same catalyst. [Pg.372]

The basic idea was to randomly acylate polyallylamine (MW = 50,000-65,000) all at once with eight different activated carboxylic acids. The relative amounts of acids used in the process was defined experimentally. Since the positions of attack could not be controlled, a huge family of diverse polymers (4) was formed. In separate runs the mixtures were treated with varying amounts of transition metal salts and tested in the hydrolysis reaction (1) —> (2) (Equation (1). The best catalyst performance was achieved in a particular case involving Fe3+, resulting in a rate acceleration of 1.5 x 105. The weakness of this otherwise brilliant approach has to do with the fact that the optimal system is composed of many different Fe3+ complexes, and that deconvolution and therefore identification of the actual catalyst is not possible. A similar method has been described in other types of reaction.30,31... [Pg.511]

Kinetic analysis with a Langmuir-type rate equation (Equation 13.4) [37] gave us the magnitudes of reaction rate constant (k) and retardation constant due to product naphthalene (K) for the superheated liquid film (0.30 g/1.0 mL) and the suspended states (0.30 g/3.0 mL) with the same Pt/C catalyst as summarized in Table 13.2. It is apparent that excellent performance with carbon-supported platinum nanoparticles in the superheated liquid-film state is realized in dehydrogenation catalysis on the basis of reaction rate and retardation constants. [Pg.446]

In order to evaluate the catalytic characteristics of colloidal platinum, a comparison of the efficiency of Pt nanoparticles in the quasi-homogeneous reaction shown in Equation 3.7, with that of supported colloids of the same charge and of a conventional heterogeneous platinum catalyst was performed. The quasi-homogeneous colloidal system surpassed the conventional catalyst in turnover frequency by a factor of 3 [157], Enantioselectivity of the reaction (Equation 3.7) in the presence of polyvinyl-pyrrolidone as stabilizer has been studied by Bradley et al. [158,159], who observed that the presence of HC1 in as-prepared cinchona alkaloids modified Pt sols had a marked effect on the rate and reproducibility [158], Removal of HC1 by dialysis improved the performance of the catalysts in both rate and reproducibility. These purified colloidal catalysts can serve as reliable... [Pg.80]

Hence the dimension ("the order") of the reaction is different, even in the simplest case, and hence a comparison of the two rate constants has little meaning. Comparisons of rates are meaningful only if the catalysts follow the same mechanism and if the product formation can be expressed by the same rate equation. In this instance we can talk about rate enhancements of catalysts relative to another. If an uncatalysed reaction and a catalysed one occur simultaneously in a system we may determine what part of the product is made via the catalytic route and what part isn t. In enzyme catalysis and enzyme mimics one often compares the k, of the uncatalysed reaction with k2 of the catalysed reaction if the mechanisms of the two reactions are the same this may be a useful comparison. A practical yardstick of catalyst performance in industry is the space-time-yield mentioned above, that is to say the yield of kg of product per reactor volume per unit of time (e.g. kg product/m3.h), assuming that other factors such as catalyst costs, including recycling, and work-up costs remain the same. [Pg.4]

The formation of water from gaseous hydrogen and oxygen is a spontaneous reaction at room temperature, although its rate may be unobservably small in the absence of a catalyst. At 298.15 K, the heat of the irreversible reaction at constant pressure is — 285,830 J mol . To calculate the entropy change, we must carry out the same transformation reversibly, which can be performed electrochemicaUy with a suitable set of electrodes. Under reversible conditions, the heat of reaction for Equation (6.99) is —48,647 J mol. Hence, for the irreversible or reversible change... [Pg.139]

The experimental study of solid catalyzed gaseous reactions can be performed in batch, continuous flow stirred tank, or tubular flow reactors. This involves a stirred tank reactor with a recycle system flowing through a catalyzed bed (Figure 5-31). For integral analysis, a rate equation is selected for testing and the batch reactor performance equation is integrated. An example is the rate on a catalyst mass basis in Equation 5-322. [Pg.376]

Theoretical criteria normally contain an explicit expression of the intrinsic chemical rate, and optionally also a measured value of the observed reaction rate. Thus, these criteria are useful only when the intrinsic kinetics are available, and one is, for example, interested in whether or not transport effects are likely to influence the performance of the catalyst as the operating conditions are changed. If it is not possible to generate a numerical solution of the governing differential equations, either due to a lack of time or to other reasons, then the use of theoretical criteria will not only save experimental effort, but also provide a more reliable estimation of the net transport influence on the observable reaction rate than simple experimental criteria can give, which do not contain any explicit... [Pg.348]

To calculate the amount of catalyst for a particular case, mass and heat balance have to be considered they can be described by two differential equations one gives the differential CO conversion for a differential mass of catalyst, and the other the associated differential temperature increase. As analytical integration is not possible, numerical methods have to be used for which today a number of computer programs are available with which the calculations can be performed on a powerful PC in the case of shift conversion. Thus the elaborate stepwise and graphical evaluation by hand [592], [609] is history. For the reaction rate r in these equations one of the kinetic expressions discussed above (for example, Eq. 83) together with the function of the temperature dependence of the rate constant has to be used. [Pg.116]

At high anodic overpotentials, methanol oxidation reaction exhibits strongly non-Tafel behavior owing to finite and potential-independent rate of methanol adsorption on catalyst surface [244]. The equations of Section 8.2.3 can be modified to take into account the non-Tafel kinetics of methanol oxidation. The results reveal an interesting regime of the anode catalyst layer operation featuring a variable thickness of the current-generating domain [245]. The experimental verification of this effect, however, has not yet been performed. [Pg.536]

The plug flow reactor is probably the most commonly used reactor in catalyst evaluation because it is simply a tube filled with catalyst that reactants are fed into. However, for catalyst evaluation, it is difficult to measure the reaction rate because concentration changes along the axis, and there are frequently temperature gradients, too. Furthermore, because the fluid velocity next to the catalyst is low, the chance for mass transfer limitations through the film around the catalyst is high. Eq. (3) is the reactor performance equation for a plug flow reactor. [Pg.2560]

In Chap. 10 rate equations were developed (for the overall transfer of reactant from gas bubble to catalyst surface) in terms of the individual mass-transfer and chemical-reaction steps [Eqs. (10-45) and (10-46)]. The purpose there was to show how the global rate r (per unit volume of bubble-free slurry) was affected by such variables as the gas-bubble-liquid interface ag, the liquid-solid catalyst interface and the various mass-transfer coefficients, and the rate constant for the chemical step. Now the objective is to evaluate the performance of a slurry reactor in terms of the results from Chap. 10 that is, we suppose that the global rate, or overall rate coefficient is known, and the goal is to design the reactor. [Pg.557]

Industrial practice has required the development of a usable equation so that workable reaction systems can be designed. Rate equations used commercially have been developed with little consideration being given to the theoretical aspects of the reaction kinetics. Thus information is developed about the action of a carbon monoxide conversion catalyst with little understanding of why it performs in the manner that it does. [Pg.304]

According to Arrhenius s equation, k = A exp the rate of a reaction is doubled for every 10°C rise in temperature. Hence, reactions performed at a 100°C higher temperature would have a reaction rate of 1/lOOOth of the conventional condition. Arrhenius s rule can be applied to derive the starting temperature and time for a reaction whose conventional conditions are known. For instance, a reaction that takes overnight (16 h) at room temperature (20°C) would be complete in 4 min at 100°C (Figure 25.2). Theoretically this is an accurate assessment, but it would be prudent to perform reactions at temperatures 10°C of the Arrhenius derived value. Reaction times are sometimes shorter than the predictions made using Arrhenius s equation. This is probably due to the development of pressure in sealed tubes or due to localized superheating of catalysts and additives within a reaction. [Pg.409]

We now consider situations in which the catalyst particle is not isothermal. Given an exothermic reaction, for example, if the particle s thermal conductivity is not large compared to the rate of heat release due to chemical reaction, the temperature rises inside the particle. We wish to explore the effects of this temperature rise on the catalyst performance. We have already written the general mass and energy balances for the catalyst particle in Section 7.3. Consider the single-reaction case, in which we have Ra = and Equations 7.14 and 7.15 reduce to... [Pg.211]


See other pages where Catalyst performance reaction rate equation is mentioned: [Pg.51]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.884]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.1634]    [Pg.757]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.2558]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.1633]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.419]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.361 ]




SEARCH



Catalyst performance

Catalysts reaction rate

Performance equation

Rate catalyst

Reaction equations

Reaction performance

Reaction rate equation

© 2024 chempedia.info