Zero conversion

Eig. 2. Efficiency to a primary intermediate as % of maximum (zero conversion) efficiency x axis is feed conversion. Parameters are oxidation rate-constant ratios ( 2 / i) for primary intermediate vs feed and reactor type A, plug-flow or batch B, back-mixed. 

The well-known difficulty with batch reactors is the uncertainty of the initial reaction conditions. The problem is to bring together reactants, catalyst and operating conditions of temperature and pressure so that at zero time everything is as desired. The initial reaction rate is usually the fastest and most error-laden. To overcome this, the traditional method was to calculate the rate for decreasingly smaller conversions and extrapolate it back to zero conversion. The significance of estimating initial rate was that without any products present, rate could be expressed as the function of reactants and temperature only. This then simplified the mathematical analysis of the rate fianction. 

The end point of the reaction is conveniently determined electrometrically using the dead-stop end point procedure. If a small e.m.f. is applied across two platinum electrodes immersed in the reaction mixture a current will flow as long as free iodine is present, to remove hydrogen and depolarise the cathode. When the last trace of iodine has reacted the current will decrease to zero or very close to zero. Conversely, the technique may be combined with a direct titration of the sample with the Karl Fischer reagent here the current in the electrode circuit suddenly increases at the first appearance of unused iodine in the solution. 

Initiator efficiency increases with reaction temperature (Table 3.4). It is also worth noting that apparent zero-conversion initiator efficiencies depend on the method of measurement. Better scavengers trap more radicals. The data in Table 3,4 suggest that monomers (MMA, S) are not as effective at scavenging radicals as the inhibitors used to measure initiator efficiencies. The finding suggests that in polymerization the initiator-derived radicals have a finite probability of... 

Table 3.4 Zero-Conversion Initiator Efficiency (/) for AIBMe under Various...

This equation (eq. 5) is commonly known as the Mayo equation.1" The equation is applicable at low (zero) conversion and is invalidated if the rate constants are chain length dependent. 

The most used method is based on application of the Mayo equation (eq. 5). For low (zero) conversion polymerizations carried out in the presence of added transfer agent T, it follows from eq. 5 that a plot of 1/ Xn vs [T]0/[M]0 should yield a straight line with slope Clr.12 Thus, a typical experimental procedure involves evaluation of the degree of polymerization for low conversion polymerizations earned out in the presence of several concentrations of added transfer agent. The usual way of obtaining Xn values is by GPC analysis of the entire molecular weight distribution. 

The traditional method for determining reactivity ratios involves determinations of the overall copolymer composition for a range of monomer feeds at zero conversion. Various methods have been applied to analyze this data. The Fineman-Ross equation (eq. 42) is based on a rearrangement of the copolymer composition equation (eq. 9). A plot of the quantity on the left hand side of eq. 9 v.v the coefficient of rAa will yield rAB as the slope and rUA as the intercept. 

For zero conversion, /jv = /ip = 1 since only monomers are present initially. At high conversion, Equation (13.18) approaches Equation (13.4). The poly-dispersity for the complete conversion case is... 

If a detailed reaction mechanism is available, we can describe the overall behavior of the rate as a function of temperature and concentration. In general it is only of interest to study kinetics far from thermodynamic equilibrium (in the zero conversion limit) and the reaction order is therefore defined as ... 

Thus, for an almost empty surface, the rate assumes its maximum ivith equal amounts of reactants, at the limit of zero conversion. Again, we need to assess the validity of the approximations under the conditions employed. Nevertheless, the above procedure for determining the reaction rate as a function of mole fraction can be quite useful in the exploration of reaction mechanisms. 

The only way to know if a material acts as a catalyst is to test it in a reaction. Determining the activity of a catalyst is not as straightforward as it may seem. Particularly when working with single crystals and model systems, there are several pit falls. For example, we prefer to measure the activity in the limit of zero conversion, to avoid results that are influenced by thermodynamic constraints, such as limitations due to equilibrium between reactants and products. We also want data under conditions of known gas composition and accurate temperature. This may become problematic... 

As described above, the activity of a catalyst can be measured by mounting it in a plug flow reactor and measuring its intrinsic reactivity outside equilibrium, with well-defined gas mixtures and temperatures. This makes it possible to obtain data that can be compared with micro-kinetic modeling. A common problem with such experiments materializes when the rate becomes high. Operating dose to the limit of zero conversion can be achieved by diluting the catalyst with support material. 

Figure 8.10. Methanol synthesis rate over a Cu(lOO) single crystal in the zero conversion limit as a function of the H2 mole fraction. The full line corresponds to the kinetic model in Eqs. (23-35) with reaction (33),...

The catalyst is now operated in the zero conversion limit and at such high temperatures that the surface can be considered to be free of reaction intermediates, i.e. 

To test this theory, a mixture of n-hexane and Relabeled 1-hexene was reacted in hydrogen over the catalyst at various space velocities. The specific activity of each of the products (the n-hexenes were lumped together) are shown in Figure 2. The important observation is made at zero conversion. When extrapolated to Infinite space velocity, the benzene has approximately the same specific activity as the hexene, thus clearly indicating that essentially all the benzene is formed in a reaction sequence that involves equilibrium with gaseous n-hexenes. It may then be concluded that olefins are intermediates in the aromatiza-tion process. 

OS 87] ]R 35] ]P 67/The longer the residence time, the higher is the conversion, as expected [72, 74]. This trend is seen in the on-line UV- and off-line HPLC spectra. Whereas on-line UV absorption showed zero conversion at too short a residence time (flow rate 10 pi min ), a level of about 50% was found in the HPLC analysis. This clearly proves that the reaction proceeds by a radical path in the dark, if sufficient time is given. 

The fraction conversion is based on the limiting reagent, in this case assumed to be species A. The parameter SA is the fraction change in the volume of a closed reacting system between zero conversion and complete conversion. As such it may take on both positive and negative values. Hence... 

At any point the molal flow rate of reactant A can be expressed in terms of the fraction conversion fA and the molal flow rate corresponding to zero conversion FA0. 

Equation 8.3.4 is an extremely useful expression relating in a simple manner the reactor volume, the molal flow rate at zero conversion, the change in fraction conversion accomplished in the reactor, and the reaction rate. A knowledge of any three of these quantities permits the fourth to be calculated directly. For reactor design purposes the two problems of primary interest can be readily solved using this equation. 

Reasonable reaction rates are needed to achieve the required DP in a reasonable time. Equations 8 and 9 indicate that it takes progressively longer and longer times to achieve each of the last few percent conversion, e.g., it takes about as long to go from 95% conversion to 96% conversion as it takes to reach 95% conversion from zero conversion. 

Extrapolation of the rate data in Fig. 24 to zero conversion shows that the initial ratio of butene-1 to frans-butene formation is about unity. Thus, butene-1 is not an intermediate in the cis-trans isomerization and direct cis-trans isomerization occurs. Similar results are found for the heterogeneous base catalyzed isomerization over sodium on alumina (17). 

Fig. 38. A Degradation experiments with pregel polymers isolated prior to the onset of macrogelation in 1,4-DVB polymerization [209] Variation of Mw ( ) and dz (O) with the time of ultrasonic degradation. The polymer sample was prepared at 5 g/100 mL monomer concentration and its initial Mw was 2.2 X106 g/mol. The dotted horizontal line shows Mw of zero conversion polymers ( individual microgels ). B Variation of Mw with the polymerization time t and monomer conversion x in 1,4-DVB polymerization at 5 g/100 mL monomer concentration. The region 1 in the box represents the limiting Mw reached by degradation experiments. [Reprinted with permission from Ref. 209,Copyright 1995, American Chemical Society].

Critical points have been calculated for such mixtures with various initial H20/C0 ratios. The results are shown in Figure 2. In this figure, the line of zero conversion is the critical line for H20 - CO binary. For mixtures with initial H20/C0 ratios greater than about 4, it is possible to find critical points for all conversions. When the initial ratio is less, this is no longer possible. Lines of 25%, 50% and 75% conversion are also shown in Figure 2. 

As part of the same study selectivity data were provided at 10-100 kPa partial pressures of n-butane at 0-17% conversion over HZSM-5 [90]. With increase in pressure and conversion secondary reactions started to occur. These results are also summarized in Table 13.6. The lowered selectivity to hydrogen, methane and ethane was attributed to increasingly less favorable conditions for monomolecular cracking. The dramatic increase in selectivity to propane which was absent at zero conversion, along with decrease in propylene was considered as signature for bimolecular cracking. More specifically, it was suggested that hydride transfer... 

The batch reactor, above described, permits both to operate at quasi-zero conversion per pass and to evaluate the cat ytic activity at finite values of the reagents conversion. A typical test performed on Si02 catalyst at 600°C is presented in Figure 1. It is remarkable how in our approach the product selectivity is unaffected by the methane conversion. A special care was taken to avoid oxygen-limiting conditions and, hence, methane conversion data obtained for oxygen conversions below 20% only have been used for the calculation of reaction rates. 

N decreases with temperature. The variation is most pronounced at smal consersions. At zero conversion, 0 is essentially zero at all temperatures. 

Scheme 4.1 Enantioselective kinetic resolution of a racemate. = rate constants for the individual enantiomers of the substrate, E = enantiomeric ratio, i.e., the ratio between the specificity constants kat/Km for the fast and slow reacting enantiomer. If a racemate is used as substrate, then these concentrations are equal at the start (i.e. zero conversion), and hence E = kR/ks.

---