Catalysis uncompetitive inhibition

An inhibitor that binds exclusively to the ES complex, or a subsequent species, with little or no affinity for the free enzyme is referred to as uncompetitive. Inhibitors of this modality require the prior formation of the ES complex for binding and inhibition. Hence these inhibitors affect the steps in catalysis subsequent to initial substrate binding that is, they affect the ES —> ES1 step. One might then expect that these inhibitors would exclusively affect the apparent value of Vm and not influence the value of KM. This, however, is incorrect. Recall, as illustrated in Figure 3.1, that the formation of the ESI ternary complex represents a thermodynamic cycle between the ES, El, and ESI states. Hence the augmentation of the affinity of an uncompetitive inhibitor that accompanies ES complex formation must be balanced by an equal augmentation of substrate affinity for the El complex. The result of this is that the apparent values of both Vmax and Ku decrease with increasing concentrations of an uncompetitive inhibitor (Table 3.3). The velocity equation for uncompetitive inhibition is as follows ... 

In this chapter we described the thermodynamics of enzyme-inhibitor interactions and defined three potential modes of reversible binding of inhibitors to enzyme molecules. Competitive inhibitors bind to the free enzyme form in direct competition with substrate molecules. Noncompetitive inhibitors bind to both the free enzyme and to the ES complex or subsequent enzyme forms that are populated during catalysis. Uncompetitive inhibitors bind exclusively to the ES complex or to subsequent enzyme forms. We saw that one can distinguish among these inhibition modes by their effects on the apparent values of the steady state kinetic parameters Umax, Km, and VmdX/KM. We further saw that for bisubstrate reactions, the inhibition modality depends on the reaction mechanism used by the enzyme. Finally, we described how one may use the dissociation constant for inhibition (Kh o.K or both) to best evaluate the relative affinity of different inhibitors for ones target enzyme, and thus drive compound optimization through medicinal chemistry efforts. 

This article describes various approaches to inhibition of enzyme catalysis. Reversible inhibition includes competitive, uncompetitive, mixed inhibition, noncompetitive inhibition, transition state, and slow tight-binding inhibition. Irreversible inhibition approaches include affinity labeling and mechanism-based enzyme inhibition. The kinetics of the various inhibition approaches are summarized, and examples of each type of Inhibition are presented. 

Many inhibitors may be present in biological samples or in buffers currently used for EIA. Pi is a competitive inhibitor of the enzyme and forms an intermediate with the enzyme which is indistinguishable from the intermediate formed during catalysis of the hydrolysis of phosphate esters (Caswell and Caplow, 1980). The K, (i.e. the for Pi) is lower than the for the substrate, typically KijK, = 0.3, i.e. a lower concentration of Pi than of the substrate is required to half-saturate the enzyme. Arsenate is a stronger competitive inhibitor than Pi, whereas phosphonates are weaker. Metal chelating products (EDTA, cysteine, thioglycolic acid) are also important inhibitors. Many amino acids show a mixed competitive or uncompetitive inhibition (Fernley, 1971). 

When a particular inhibitor I acts by uncompetitive inhibition, then plots of 1/v versus 1/[S] data obtained at different fixed concentrations of [I] should obey Equation (8.20) and take on the visual appearance shown in Figure 8.30. In this case, when I acts as a non-competitive inhibitor, there are practical reductions in both the maximal effective rate of catalysis V iax and in equal proportion. 

Compare competitive inliibition and uncompetitive inhibition in enzyme catalysis. Exercise 4.8... 

The manifold intermediates in homogeneous transition-metal catalysis are certainly metal complexes and therefore show a behaviour like ordinary coordination compounds associations of phosphorus donors open up multifarious additional controls. Both, substrates and P ligands are Lewis bases that we have to consider and that compete at the coordination centers of the metal, leading to competitive, non-competitive or uncompetitive activation or inhibition processes in analogy to the terminology of enzyme chemistry... 

The non-competitive and uncompetitive modes of inhibition described above are special cases that in practice arise very rarely in these simple forms. In reality, the situation is usually more complex in that inhibitors bind with differing affinities to the free and substrate-bound forms of the enzyme, and also the ternary EIS complex may be able to undergo catalysis, albeit at a lower rate. These circumstances define what is called mixed inhibition, which is less easy to characterise since the kinetic behaviour and equations are much more complex. The reader is referred to Cor-nish-Bowden (1995) for a comprehensive and authoritative account of this and other aspects of enzyme kinetics. 

The Michaelis-Menten equation (8.8) and the irreversible Uni Uni kinetic scheme (Scheme 8.1) are only really applicable to an irreversible biocatalytic process involving a single substrate interacting with a biocatalyst that comprises a single catalytic site. Hence with reference to the biocatalyst examples given in Section 8.1, Equation (8.8), the Uni Uni kinetic scheme is only really directly applicable to the steady state kinetic analysis of TIM biocatalysis (Figure 8.1, Table 8.1). Furthermore, even this statement is only valid with the proviso that all biocatalytic initial rate values are determined in the absence of product. Similarly, the Uni Uni kinetic schemes for competitive, uncompetitive and non-competitive inhibition are only really applicable directly for the steady state kinetic analysis for the inhibition of TIM (Table 8.1). Therefore, why are Equation (8.8) and the irreversible Uni Uni kinetic scheme apparently used so widely for the steady state analysis of many different biocatalytic processes A main reason for this is that Equation (8.8) is simple to use and measured k t and Km parameters can be easily interpreted. There is only a necessity to adapt catalysis conditions such that... 

Mechanisms of CYP inhibition can be broadly divided into two categories reversible inhibition and mechanism-based inactivation. Depending on the mode of interaction between CYP enzymes and inhibitors, reversible CYP inhibition is further characterized as competitive, noncompetitive, uncompetitive, and mixed (Ito et al., 1998b). Evaluation of reversible inhibition of CYP reactions is often conducted under conditions where M-M kinetics is obeyed. Based on the scheme illustrated in Fig. 5.1, various types of reversible inhibition are summarized in Table 5.1. Figure 5.1 depicts a simple substrate-enzyme complex during catalysis. In the presence of a reversible inhibitor, such a complex can be disrupted leading to enzyme inhibition. 

While the in vitro cases are regulated by the uncompetitive fast reactions in which the transition state is tuimeled with a considerable energetic stabilization decay imtil the competitive slow catalysis with a small energetic width of tuimeling of the enzyme-transition states - see relations (1.185) and (1.187), within the in vivo cases the order of times and energetic widths tunneling is vice versa for inhibition regulation sitirations - see the relations (1.186) and (1.188) (Putz Lacr 2007 Putz Putz, 2011). 

---