Cancellation theorem

The first reliable energy band theories were based on a powerfiil approximation, call the pseudopotential approximation. Within this approximation, the all-electron potential corresponding to interaction of a valence electron with the iimer, core electrons and the nucleus is replaced by a pseudopotential. The pseudopotential reproduces only the properties of the outer electrons. There are rigorous theorems such as the Phillips-Kleinman cancellation theorem that can be used to justify the pseudopotential model [2, 3, 26]. The Phillips-Kleimnan cancellation theorem states that the orthogonality requirement of the valence states to the core states can be described by an effective repulsive... 

The arguments for Edwards9 cancellation theorem are rather subtle, and we do not think that it is universally true (Mott 1989). For weak scattering, the relaxation time t must be proportional tog-1, by Fermi s golden rule. The mean free path l is given by the equation... 

We emphasize that the use of g in these equations may be justified only if /—a, because of the Edwards cancellation theorem (Section 6). We should expect a metal-insulator transition to occur for some value of in the neighbourhood of For several liquid systems there is experimental evidence that the interference term in (52) is absent. Thus for liquid TeTl alloys, with variation of composition and temperature, for a less than the Ioffe-Regel value e2/3hai the conductivity is proportional to the square of the Pauli paramagnetic susceptibility and then to 2. These results are due to Cutler (1977). Warren (1970a, b, 1972a, b) examined... 

The assumption that a is proportional to the square of the density of states is normally deduced only in the regime Edwards cancellation theorem. As shown in Chapter 1, Section 6.3, however, this is valid only if we can write vf=h l dE/dk and deduce vf ccg 1, which means a uniform expansion of the band. This is certainly not so for weak localization. For the singularity predicted by Altshuler and Aronov, any correction to dE/dk will be zero if averaged over a range kBTabout EF. We consider then that if a>%,... 

The seeds for the development of linear methods may be found in the 1971 paper by Andersen [1.21] which contains a definition of muffin-tin orbitals, an addition theorem for tails of partial waves, and the tail cancellation theorem. Soon after, these ideas were developed into a practicable band-calculation method, the linear combination of muffin-tin orbitals (LCMTO) method [1.22,... 

If we approximate the crystal potential by an array of non-overlapping muffin-tin wells as in (5.2), the energy-dependent muffin-tin orbitals (5.13) may be used in conjunction with the tail-cancellation theorem to obtain the so-called KKR equations. These have the form (1.21) and provide exact solutions for muffin-tin geometry. Computationally, however, they are rather inefficient and it is therefore desirable to develop a method based upon the variational principle and a fixed basis set, which leads to the computatinal-ly efficient eigenvalue problem (1.19). 

To introduce the subject of many atoms per cell, we apply the tail-cancellation theorem, Sect.2.1, to a collection of atoms. In the derivation it is convenient to consider the simplest case, i.e. a diatomic molecule, but the results will be valid for any molecule or cluster. Our starting point is the energy-independent muffin-tin orbitals (2.1) in the atomic-sphere approximation, i.e. 

Prior to 1975 or so, the words ab initio did not exist in the scientific vocabulary for methods describing the electronic structure of the solid state. At that time, a number of very powerful and successful methods had been developed to describe the electronic structure of solids, but these methods did not pretend to be first principles or ab initio methods. The foremost example of electronic structure methods at that time was the empirical pseudopotential method (EPM) [1]. The EPM was based on the Phillips-Kleinman cancelation theorem [2], which justified the replacement of the strong, allelectron potential with a weak pseudopotential [1]. The pseudopotential replicated only the chemically active valence electron states. Physically, the cancelation theorem is based on the orthogonality requirement of the valence states to the core states [1]. This requirement results in a repulsive part of the pseudopotential which cancels the strongly attractive part of the core potential and excludes the valence states from the core region. Because of this property, simple bases such as plane waves can be used efficiently with pseudopotentials. 

Since the mean free path A is already quite short in the dense metal, the conclusion seems unavoidable that the loffe-Regel limit of the NFE regime is reached around 11 g cm so that A a and, moreover, that the Edwards cancellation theorem begins to fail. Thereafter, with further reduction of the density to about 9 g cm , the conductivity drops by another order of magnitude and the Hall coefficient increases sharply to about three times the free electron value. 

We arrive at the final value theorem after we cancel the f(0) terms on both sides. 

Alcoba [80] reported four theorems showing that the cancellation of these types of terms is a sufficient condition to guarantee that these matrices correspond to eigenstates of the system. In particular, his first theorem states the following. 

Since this chapter was centered on the CSE, only the most relevant aspects of the MCSE theory and practice have been treated here. It is nevertheless to be hoped that the brevity of this exposition has been sufficient to show the importance of this theory. Indeed, by considering the properties of the cancellation terms [81] jointly with Alcoba s theorems and the strucmre of the 4-MCSE, it can be concluded that an N-body eigenproblem is just a four-electron one. Moreover, the basic variable of this equation is the 2-CSE and through it the 2-RDM. Because the FCI 4-RDM determines a fixed point in the iterative process, the results obtained in the calculations reported here and in some other unpublished ones confirm the exactness of the 4-MCSE solution. 

The functional dependence npon 9 is identical for the 2 distribntions. The coefficients cancel out when the likelihood is used in Bayes theorem since they also appear in... 

Present-day diffraction facilities provide easy access to very low-temperature data collection and hence to an accurate determination of electron densities in crystals. Application of standard theorems of classical physics then provides an evaluation of the Coulombic interaction energies in crystal lattices [27]. These calculations are parameter-less and hence are as accurate as the electron density is. Moreover, for highly polar compounds, typically aminoacid zwitterions and the like, a fortunate coincidence cancels out all other attractive and repulsive contributions, and the Coulombic term almost coincides with the total interaction energy. 

The gauge transform Aq A + does not modify the value of the magnetic flux F calculated on the basis of Stokes theorem, as dehned above. However, this gauge transform does not allow us to cancel the external vector potential. This statement is in sharp contrast with, and even contradicts, what is usually claimed in the available literature. Indeed, Helmholtz decomposition of the vector potential A = + Ax shows that only the longitudinal component An is modified in this process ... 

Koopmans theorem can be formally applied to electron affinities (EAs) as well, i.e., the EA can be taken to be the negative of the orbital energy of the lowest unoccupied (virtual) orbital. Here, however, relaxation effects and correlation effects both favor the radical anion, so rather than canceling, the errors are additive, and Koopmans theorem estimates will almost always underestimate the EA. It is thus generally a better idea to compute EAs from a ASCF approach whenever possible. 

Koopmans theorem also implies that the eigenvalue associated with the HF LUMO may be equated with the EA. However, in the case of EAs errors associated with basis set incompleteness and differential correlation energies do not cancel, but instead they reinforce one another, and as a result EAs computed by this approach are usually entirely untrustworthy. 

Such a definition can, evidently, be extended to any number of routes. It is clear that if A(1), A(2), A<3) are routes of a given reaction, then any linear combination of these routes will also be a route of the reaction (i.e., will produce the cancellation of intermediates). Obviously, any number of such combinations can be formed. Speaking in terms of linear algebra, the reaction routes form a vector space. If, in a set of reaction routes, none can be represented as a linear combination of others, then the routes of this set are linearly independent. A set of linearly independent reaction routes such that any route of the reaction is a linear combination of these routes of the set will be called the basis of routes. It follows from the theorems of linear algebra that although the basis of routes can be chosen in different ways, the number of basis routes for a given reaction mechanism is determined uniquely, being the dimension of the space of the routes. Any set of routes is a basis if the routes of the set are linearly independent and if their number is equal to the dimension of the space of routes. 

---