Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electronic state valence

MDS Metastable deexcitation spectroscopy [119] Same as PI Surface valence-electron states... [Pg.314]

In practice, each CSF is a Slater determinant of molecular orbitals, which are divided into three types inactive (doubly occupied), virtual (unoccupied), and active (variable occupancy). The active orbitals are used to build up the various CSFs, and so introduce flexibility into the wave function by including configurations that can describe different situations. Approximate electronic-state wave functions are then provided by the eigenfunctions of the electronic Flamiltonian in the CSF basis. This contrasts to standard FIF theory in which only a single determinant is used, without active orbitals. The use of CSFs, gives the MCSCF wave function a structure that can be interpreted using chemical pictures of electronic configurations [229]. An interpretation in terms of valence bond sti uctures has also been developed, which is very useful for description of a chemical process (see the appendix in [230] and references cited therein). [Pg.300]

The trends in chemical and physical properties of the elements described beautifully in the periodic table and the ability of early spectroscopists to fit atomic line spectra by simple mathematical formulas and to interpret atomic electronic states in terms of empirical quantum numbers provide compelling evidence that some relatively simple framework must exist for understanding the electronic structures of all atoms. The great predictive power of the concept of atomic valence further suggests that molecular electronic structure should be understandable in terms of those of the constituent atoms. [Pg.7]

Fig. 2. (a) Energy, E, versus wave vector, k, for free particle-like conduction band and valence band electrons (b) the corresponding density of available electron states, DOS, where Ep is Fermi energy (c) the Fermi-Dirac distribution, ie, the probabiUty P(E) that a state is occupied, where Kis the Boltzmann constant and Tis absolute temperature ia Kelvin. The tails of this distribution are exponential. The product of P(E) and DOS yields the energy distribution... [Pg.344]

Valence electrons also can be excited by interacting with the electron beam to produce a collective, longitudinal charge density oscillation called a plasmon. Plas-mons can exist only in solids and liquids, and not in gases because they require electronic states with a strong overlap between atoms. Even insulators can exhibit... [Pg.326]

It should be noted that a comprehensive ELNES study is possible only by comparing experimentally observed structures with those calculated [2.210-2.212]. This is an extra field of investigation and different procedures based on molecular orbital approaches [2.214—2.216], multiple-scattering theory [2.217, 2.218], or band structure calculations [2.219, 2.220] can be used to compute the densities of electronic states in the valence and conduction bands. [Pg.63]

We will limit ourselves here to transition metals. It is well known that in these metals, the cohesive properties are largely dominated by the valence d electrons, and consequently, sp electrons can be neglected save for the elements with an almost empty or filled d valence shelP. Since the valence d atomic orbitals are rather localized, the d electronic states in the solid are well described in the tight-binding approximation. In this approximation, the cohesive energy of a bulk crystal is usually written as ... [Pg.372]

A primary goal of the periodic table is to assist recognition of the ground-state valence electron configuration of each atom, the chief determinant of its chemical properties" ([21], p 5). [Pg.136]

The metaUic GasIngSrig can be described a an intergrowth of Zintl and metalHc layers, where the valence states of the Zintl layers lie deep below the Fermi level. The excellent metalHc behavior of Ga5ln9Sng was attributed to the well-dispersed electronic states of the intermetallic layers that dominate the Fermi level. [Pg.163]

C08-0102. Draw energy level diagrams that show the ground-state valence electron configurations for Cu ,... [Pg.564]

Instead, we believe the electronic structure changes are a collective effect of several distinct processes. For example, at surfaces the loss of the bulk symmetry will induce electronic states with different DOS compared to bulk. As the particle sizes are decreased, the contribution of these surface related states becomes more prominent. On the other hand, the decrease of the coordination number is expected to diminish the d-d and s-d hybridization and the crystal field splitting, therefore leading to narrowing of the valence d-band. At the same time, bond length contraction (i.e. a kind of reconstruction ), which was observed in small particles [89-92], should increase the overlap of the d-orbitals of the neighboring atoms, partially restoring the width of the d-band. [Pg.94]

First we consider the origin of band gaps and characters of the valence and conduction electron states in 3d transition-metal compounds [104]. Band structure calculations using effective one-particle potentials predict often either metallic behavior or gaps which are much too small. This is due to the fact that the electron-electron interactions are underestimated. In the Mott-Hubbard theory excited states which are essentially MMCT states are taken into account dfd -y The subscripts i and] label the transition-metal sites. These... [Pg.177]

Kier and Hall noticed that the quantity (S -S) jn, where n is the principal quantum number and 5 is computed with Eq. (2), correlates with the Mulliken-Jaffe electronegativities [19, 20]. This correlation suggested an application of the valence delta index to the computation of the electronic state of an atom. The index (5 -5)/n defines the Kier-Hall electronegativity KHE and it is used also to define the hydrogen E-state (HE-state) index. [Pg.89]

In electrocatalysis, the reactants are in contact with the electrode, and electronic interactions are strong. Therefore, the one-electron approximation is no longer justified at least two spin states on a valence orbital must be considered. Further, the form of the bond Hamiltonian (2.12) is not satisfactory, since it simply switches between two electronic states. This approach becomes impractical with two spin states in one orbital also, it has an ad hoc nature, which is not satisfactory. [Pg.49]


See other pages where Electronic state valence is mentioned: [Pg.19]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.2222]    [Pg.2391]    [Pg.2860]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.735]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.54]   


SEARCH



Valence electron

Valence electrons Valency

Valence state

© 2024 chempedia.info