Coulomb interaction energy

The isomer shift, S, is the consequence of the Coulomb interaction between the positively charged nucleus and the negatively charged s-electrons. Since the size of the nucleus in the excited state differs from that in the ground state, the Coulomb interaction energies are different as well. The isomer shift is therefore a measure of the s-electron density at the nucleus, and yields useful information on the oxidation state of the iron in the absorber. Isomer shift values are expressed in velocity units, mm/s, and are usually given with respect to the peak position of a reference such as metallic iron. Table 5.2 lists a few isomer shift values of common iron compounds. 

Dzombak and Morel, 1990, have illustratively and compactly summarized (Fig. 3.3) the interdependence of the Coulombic interaction energy with pH and surface charge density at various ionic strengths for hydrous ferric oxide suspensions in... 

Present-day diffraction facilities provide easy access to very low-temperature data collection and hence to an accurate determination of electron densities in crystals. Application of standard theorems of classical physics then provides an evaluation of the Coulombic interaction energies in crystal lattices [27]. These calculations are parameter-less and hence are as accurate as the electron density is. Moreover, for highly polar compounds, typically aminoacid zwitterions and the like, a fortunate coincidence cancels out all other attractive and repulsive contributions, and the Coulombic term almost coincides with the total interaction energy. 

These density matrices are themselves quadratic functions of the Cl coefficients and they reflect all of the permutational symmetry of the determinental functions used in constructing T they are a compact representation of all of the Slater-Condon rules as applied to the particular CSFs which appear in Tk They contain all information about the spin-orbital occupancy of the CSFs in Tk The one- and two- electron integrals < (f>i I f I (f>j > and < (f>i(f>j I g I ( >k4>i > contain all of the information about the magnitudes of the kinetic and Coulombic interaction energies. 

In Chap. E, photoelectron spectroscopic methods, in recent times more and more employed to the study of actinide solids, are reviewed. Results on metals and on oxides, which are representative of two types of bonds, the metallic and ionic, opposite with respect to the problem itineracy vs. localization of 5f states, are discussed. In metals photoemission gives a photographic picture of the Mott transition between Pu and Am. In oxides, the use of photoelectron spectroscopy (direct and inverse photoemission) permits a measurement of the intra-atomic Coulomb interaction energy Uh. 

Photoelectron spectroscopy is however able to give valuable information on the localized behaviour of open shell electrons. The second parameter, the Coulomb interaction energy Uh, to be balanced (Chap. A) with W to give a judgement on the localization vs. itineracy problem, has been shown to be experimentally accessible when XPS and BIS are applied on the same compound. 

The most important information (by Baer and Schoenes ) obtained when using the combined XPS/BIS method is the Coulomb interaction energy Uh that we have discussed in Part II. For UO2, Uh = 4.6 0.8 eV has been obtained. This large separation between the two final states (2(5f ) —> 5f + 5f ) is in itself a hint to the localized character of the 5 f states in UO2. Baer and Schoenes compared the value for Uh with theoretical values they found an agreement with Uh = 4 eV as calculated by Herbst et al. for a U" " metal core. As discussed in Chap. A, intraatomic calculations of Uh in metals possibly underestimate screening by conduction electrons nevertheless, they should be valid in the case of an insulating solid as UO2. 

We therefore learn that the short-range forces simultaneously affect both the pure coulombic interaction energy and the internal energies of the ions themselves, and reach the important conclusion that the nonideality of the solution is not sufficiently defined just by the presence of interactions (unless we also include the interactions of the electrons with the nuclei). That the polarizations should play a part in determining the distribution of ions is a fact which could not be deduced from the original Debye model. 

The signs + and are for repulsion and attraction, respectively.) L is called Onsager radius [73] at which the Coulomb interaction energy equals the thermal energy kBT. Finally, for the Coulomb attraction (see more details in Chapter 4), the effective reaction radius is [67]... 

The coordination numbers of the lanthanide cation in these higher oxides depend on the type and numbers of the modules assembled in the phase. When one module is stacked upon another, then a cation located on the interface would be in both modules. The type of stacked module, as shown in Figure 25, determines the coordination number of the cation. The separation distance between the two oxygen vacancies dominates the Coulomb interaction energy of the system the largest separation should be favorable since the shorter one has a higher Coulomb interaction energy. 

Equation 6.64 refers to the electrostatic interaction of one pair of atoms, A and B, and the overall Coulomb interaction energy between two molecules, X and Y, would include all possible pairs of atoms from the different molecules ... 

Upon electronic excitation the redox properties of either the electron donor (D) or the acceptor (A) are enhanced. The feasibility of an electron transfer can be estimated from a simple free reaction energy consideration as customary in the frame of the Rehm-Weller approach (Eq. (1)) [11], where Efy2 (P) and 4) represent the oxidation and reduction potential of the donor or the acceptor, respectively. AEexcit stands for the electronic excitation energy, whereas Aiscoui indicates the coulombic interaction energy of the products formed (most commonly radical ions). This simplified approach allows a first approximation on the feasibility of a PET process without considering the more complex kinetics as controlled by the Marcus theory [6c]. For exergonic processes (AG<0) a PET process becomes thermodynamically favorable. 

---