Bubble-developing region

Ranade and Joshi (1987) have developed a criterion for small bubbles. The small bubbles rise upward without any oscillations. The liquid carried upward in the bubble wakes is released at the top liquid surface, which then flows downward in the bubble-free region. The downward liquid flow hinders the bubble rise. It was proposed that the transition will occur when the bubble rise velocity equals the downward liquid velocity. Under this condition, the bubble rise velocity with respect to the column wall is zero and the gas phase accumulates in the column, leading to transition. 

The resultant velocity vectors of it and v are plotted in Fig. 7.8. Due to the outward moving surface flow induced by the disk, a strong recirculation flow develops outside the bubbling jet region. Hence, mixing in the bath is much stronger than the CAS model. 

Both high bulk and surface shear viscosity delay film thinning and stretching deformations that precede bubble bursting. The development of ordered stmctures in the surface region can also have a stabilizing effect. Liquid crystalline phases in foam films enhance stabiUty (18). In water-surfactant-fatty alcohol systems the alcohol components may serve as a foam stabilizer or a foam breaker depending on concentration (18). 

Runaway criteria developed for plug-flow tubular reactors, which are mathematically isomorphic with batch reactors with a constant coolant temperature, are also included in the tables. They can be considered conservative criteria for batch reactors, which can be operated safer due to manipulation of the coolant temperature. Balakotaiah et al. (1995) showed that in practice safe and runaway regions overlap for the three types of reactors for homogeneous reactions (1) batch reactor (BR), and, equivalently, plug-flow reactor (PFR), (2) CSTR, and (3) continuously operated bubble column reactor (BCR). 

AES was developed in the late 1960s, and in this technique electrons are detected after emission from the sample as the result of a non-radiative decay of an excited atom in the surface region of the sample. The effect was first observed in bubble chamber studies by Pierre Auger (1925), a French physicist, who described the process involved. 

Because of the inadequacies of the aforementioned models, a number of papers in the 1950s and 1960s developed alternative mathematical descriptions of fluidized beds that explicitly divided the reactor contents into two phases, a bubble phase and an emulsion or dense phase. The bubble or lean phase is presumed to be essentially free of solids so that little, if any, reaction occurs in this portion of the bed. Reaction takes place within the dense phase, where virtually all of the solid catalyst particles are found. This phase may also be referred to as a particulate phase, an interstitial phase, or an emulsion phase by various authors. Figure 12.19 is a schematic representation of two phase models of fluidized beds. Some models also define a cloud phase as the region of space surrounding the bubble that acts as a source and a sink for gas exchange with the bubble. 

Two-Region Models. Recognizing that the bubbling bed consists of two rather distinct zones, the bubble phase and the emulsion phase, experimenters spent much effort in developing models based on this fact. Since such models contain six parameters, see Fig. 20.7, many simplifications and special cases have been explored (eight by 1962,15 by 1972, and over two dozen to date), and even the complete six-parameter model of Fig. 20.7 has been used. The users of this model. 

The expressions developed in this chapter show that if we know estimate a, and measure u f and Uq, then all flow quantities and regional volumes can be determined in terms of one parameter, the bubble size. Figure 20.9 then represents the model as visualized. The use of this model to calculate chemical reactor behavior is straightforward and direct. The special feature of this model is that its one parameter can be tested against what is measured and what is observed. 

---