Boundary layer, turbulent natural

I. Turbulent, local flat plate, natural convection, vertical plate Turbulent, average, flat plate, natural convection, vertical plate Nsk. = — = 0.0299Wg=Ws = D x(l + 0.494W ) )- = 0.0249Wg=W2f X (1 + 0.494WE )- [S] Low solute concentration and low transfer rates. Use arithmetic concentration difference. Ncr > 10 " Assumes laminar boundary layer is small fraction of total. D [151] p. 225... 

The probability density function of u is shown for four points in Fig. 11.16, two points in the wall jet and two points in the boundary layer close to the floor. For the points in the wall jet (Fig. 11.16<2) the probability (unction shows a preferred value of u showing that the flow has a well-defined mean velocity and that the velocity is fluctuating around this mean value. Close to the floor near the separation at x/H = I (Fig. 11.16f ) it is hard to find any preferred value of u, which shows that the flow is irregular and unstable with no well-defined mean velocity and large turbulent intensity. From Figs. 11.15 and 11.16 we can see that LES gives us information about the nature of the turbulent fluctuations that can be important for thermal comfort. This type of information is not available from traditional CFD using models. 

It may be noted that no assumptions have been made concerning the nature of the flow within the boundary layer and therefore this relation is applicable to both the streamline and the turbulent regions. The relation between ux and y is derived for streamline and turbulent flow over a plane surface and the integral in equation 11.9 is evaluated. 

Let us just consider the piloted ignition case. Then, at Tpy a sufficient fuel mass flux is released at the surface. Under typical fire conditions, the fuel vapor will diffuse by turbulent natural convection to meet incoming air within the boundary layer. This will take some increment of time to reach the pilot, whereby the surface temperature has continued to rise. 

Now let us consider the mixing time, t. This will be estimated by an order of magnitude estimate for diffusion to occur across the boundary layer thickness, <5Bl- If we have turbulent natural conditions, it is common to represent the heat transfer in terms of the Nusselt number for a vertical plate of height, , as... 

Apart from the nature of the bulk flow, the hydrodynamic scenario close to the surfaces of drug particles has to be considered. The nature of the hydrodynamic boundary layer generated at a particle s surface may be laminar or turbulent regardless of the bulk flow characteristics. The turbulent boundary layer is considered to be thicker than the laminar layer. Nevertheless, mass transfer rates are usually increased with turbulence due to the presence of the viscous turbulent sub-layer. This is the part of the (total) turbulent boundary layer that constitutes the main resistance to the overall mass transfer in the case of turbulence. The development of a viscous turbulent sub-layer reduces the overall resistance to mass transfer since this viscous sub-layer is much narrower than the (total) laminar boundary layer. Thus, mass transfer from turbulent boundary layers is greater than would be calculated according to the total boundary layer thickness. 

Search strategies that exploit the natural tendency of the molecules to remain adsorbed on surface particles and to become trapped in the boundary layers near the surface are likely to be most productive. If odor plumes from buried sources do develop, they are likely to remain close to the surface until they dissipate from turbulence. 

In the seventies, the growing interest in global geochemical cycles and in the fate of man-made pollutants in the environment triggered numerous studies of air-water exchange in natural systems, especially between the ocean and the atmosphere. In micrometeorology the study of heat and momentum transfer at water surfaces led to the development of detailed models of the structure of turbulence and momentum transfer close to the interface. The best-known outcome of these efforts, Deacon s (1977) boundary layer model, is similar to Whitman s film model. Yet, Deacon replaced the step-like drop in diffusivity (see Fig. 19.8a) by a continuous profile as shown in Fig. 19.8 b. As a result the transfer velocity loses the simple form of Eq. 19-4. Since the turbulence structure close to the interface also depends on the viscosity of the fluid, the model becomes more complex but also more powerful (see below). 

Now return to a view of the nature of flow in the boundary layer. It has been called laminar, and so it is for values of the Reynolds number below a critical value. But for years, beginning about the time of Osborne Reynolds experiments and revelations in the field of fluid flow, it has been known that the laminar property disappears, and the flow suddenly becomes turbulent, when the critical VUv is reached. Usually flow starts over a surface as laminar but after passing over a suitable length the boundary layer becomes turbulent, with a thin laminar sublayer thought to exist because of damping of normal turbulent components at the surface. See Fig. 6. 

Available analyses of turbulent natural convection mostly rely in some way on the assumption that the turbulence structure is similar to that which exists in turbulent forced convection, see [96] to [105]. In fact, the buoyancy forces influence the turbulence and the direct use of empirical information obtained from studies of forced convection to the analysis of natural convection is not always appropriate. This will be discussed further in Chapter 9. Here, however, a discussion of one of the earliest analyses of turbulent natural convective boundary layer flow on a flat plate will be presented. This analysis involves assumptions that are typical of those used in the majority of available analyses of turbulent natural convection. 

Equation (8.166) cannot be directly applied to natural convective boundary layer flows because in such flows the velocity is zero at the outer edge of the boundary layer. However, Eq. (8.166) should give a good description of the velocity distribution near the wall. It is therefore assumed that in a turbulent natural convective boundary layer ... 

To proceed further, relationships for the wall shear stress, tw> and the wall heat transfer rate, qw, must be assumed. It is consistent with the assumption that the flow near the wall in a turbulent natural convective boundary layer is similar to that in a turbulent forced convective boundary layer to assume that the expressions for tw and qw that have been found to apply in forced convection should apply in natural convection. It will therefore be assumed here that the following apply in a natural convective boundary layer ... 

Solution. The following integrals arise in the approximate solution for turbulent natural convective boundary layer flow over a flat plate discussed above ... 

Some of the more commonly used methods of obtaining solutions to problems involving natural convective flow have been discussed in this chapter. Attention has been given to laminar natural convective flows over the outside of bodies, to laminar natural convection through vertical open-ended channels, to laminar natural convection in a rectangular enclosure, and to turbulent natural convective boundary layer flow. Solutions to the boundary layer forms of the governing equations and to the full governing equations have been discussed. 

Henkes, R.A.W.M. and Hoogendoom. C.J., Comparison of Turbullence Models for the Natural Convection Boundary Layer Along a Heated Vertical Plate , Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 32, pp. 157-169, 1989. 

Metzner and Friend [Ind. Eng. Chem., 51, 879 (1959)] present relationships for turbulent heat transfer with nonnewtonian fluids. Relationships for heat transfer by natural convection and through laminar boundary layers are available in Skellands book (op. cit.). 

There are two types of convection, free and forced (Holman, 2009 Incropera et al., 2007 Kreith and Bohn, 2007). Free (natural) convection occurs when the heat transferred from a leaf causes the air outside the unstirred layer to warm, expand, and thus to decrease in density this more buoyant warmer air then moves upward and thereby moves heat away from the leaf. Forced convection, caused by wind, can also remove the heated air outside the boundary layer. As the wind speed increases, more and more heat is dissipated by forced convection relative to free convection. However, even at a very low wind speed of 0.10 m s-1, forced convection dominates free convection as a means of heat loss from most leaves (0.10 m s-1 = 0.36 km hour-1 = 0.22 mile hour-1). We can therefore generally assume that heat is conducted across the boundary layer adjacent to a leaf and then is removed by forced convection in the surrounding turbulent air. In this section, we examine some general characteristics of wind, paying particular attention to the air boundary layers adjacent to plant parts, and introduce certain dimensionless numbers that can help indicate whether forced or free convection should dominate. We conclude with an estimate of the heat conduction/convection for a leaf. 

The simulations were performed assuming that the flow is laminar. Additionally, the contact angle is assumed to be known. The initial velocity is assumed to be zero everywhere in the domain. The initial fluid temperature profile is taken to be linear in the natural convection thermal boundary layer and the thermal boundary layer thickness, 5j, is evaluated using the correlation for the turbulent natural convection on a horizontal plate as, Jj. =1. 4(vfiCil ... 

---