Black box theory

In black box theory the excitation (input) and output ports must be defined, the transmission direction must be defined. A network is reciprocal if the ratio between excitation and response remains unaltered when the ports of excitation and response are interchanged. Then the transfer immittances are equal, Y12 = Y21 and Z12 = Z21. Tissue is reciprocal only if it is... 

In Section 8.1, the conditions for black box theory are found. To be valid the network must be linear, passive, and causal. A nonlinear system is a system that does not obey the superposition theorem, the output of a nonlinear system is not proportional to the input. 

The time that a molecule spends in a reactive system will affect its probability of reacting and the measurement, interpretation, and modeling of residence time distributions are important aspects of chemical reaction engineering. Part of the inspiration for residence time theory came from the black box analysis techniques used by electrical engineers to study circuits. These are stimulus-response or input-output methods where a system is disturbed and its response to the disturbance is measured. The measured response, when properly interpreted, is used to predict the response of the system to other inputs. For residence time measurements, an inert tracer is injected at the inlet to the reactor, and the tracer concentration is measured at the outlet. The injection is carried out in a standardized way to allow easy interpretation of the results, which can then be used to make predictions. Predictions include the dynamic response of the system to arbitrary tracer inputs. More important, however, are the predictions of the steady-state yield of reactions in continuous-flow systems. All this can be done without opening the black box. 

Therefore we increasingly take the view that rather than fully simulating the business context, which may seem like a black box approach, it is better to have decision makers interact with more selective simulations. These help develop their intuitions and hone their judgment and reasoning ability in focused areas, especially in the area of probability, applied statistics, and decision theory, which is nonintuitive without such practice. 

If we except the Density Functional Theory and Coupled Clusters treatments (see, for example, reference [1] and references therein), the Configuration Interaction (Cl) and the Many-Body-Perturbation-Theory (MBPT) [2] approaches are the most widely-used methods to deal with the correlation problem in computational chemistry. The MBPT approach based on an HF-SCF (Hartree-Fock Self-Consistent Field) single reference taking RHF (Restricted Hartree-Fock) [3] or UHF (Unrestricted Hartree-Fock ) orbitals [4-6] has been particularly developed, at various order of perturbation n, leading to the widespread MPw or UMPw treatments when a Moller-Plesset (MP) partition of the electronic Hamiltonian is considered [7]. The implementation of such methods in various codes and the large distribution of some of them as black boxes make the MPn theories a common way for the non-specialist to tentatively include, with more or less relevancy, correlation effects in the calculations. 

As is the case for standard orthogonal-orbital MCSCF calculations, the optimization of VB wavefimctions can be a complicated task, and a program such as CASVB should therefore not be treated as a black box . This is true, to a greater or lesser extent, for most procedures that involve orbital optimization (and, hence, non-linear optimization problems), but these difficulties are compounded in valence bond theory by the... 

You must also decide how to approach computational chemistry. Many software packages are now available that allow the user to make sophisticated calculations without a detailed knowledge of the underlying theory. However, it is not productive of learning to let the students use the software as a black box. You must decide how much of this theory to present and how to present it so that the students can appreciate what their calculations mean. 

The black box situation of SCF applications has not yet been reached for the multiconfigurational SCF theory. This constitutes a major problem, since MCSCF is a much better starting point for quantum chemical calculations on many interesting chemical problems (a good example is studies of transition states for chemical reactions). A development towards more automatized procedures can consequently be expectedto take place in MCSCF theory too. 

The scales involved in such a reactor should be defined in a relative manner. For a chemist, the molecule is at the start and catalyst (particle) at the end of the scales. To reveal the reaction mechanism over a catalyst particle, a sequence of network of elementary reactions" will be needed. Accordingly, on the basis of, for example, the molecular collision theory (Turns, 2000), the "global reaction" can be derived in terms of global rate coefficient and reaction order. Here, the resultant reaction mechanism is termed "global" by chemists, because the use of it for a specific problem is normally a "black box" approach, without knowing exactly the underlying networks or structures of chemical routes from reactants to products. On the other hand, for a chemical reaction engineer, the catalyst (particle) is often the start and the reactor is the end. The reaction free of inner-particle and outer-particle diffusions, that is,... 

This book is a practical manual and is intended for tutorial classes or self-studies. Being a manual, it should provide a firm enough background to allow the student to understand perturbation theory, rather than using it as a black box. The exercises found throughout the text are classified by symbols E (easy), M (moderate), or D (difficult) to indicate their complexity. Full solutions are given in each case. These exercises must be considered an integral part of the course. 

Maintaining a balance between theory and practice is difficult. We have avoided the arcane areas of electrons and quantum mechanics, but the alternative black-box approach is not acceptable. We avoided these extremes with a pictorial, non-mathematical approach presented in some detail. Diagrams abound and excellent spectra are presented at every opportunity since interpretations remain the goal. 

Schleiden and Schwann worked in the early to middle 1800s—the time of Darwin s travels and the writing of The Origin of Species. To Darwin, then, as to every other scientist of the time, the cell was a black box. Nonetheless he was able to make sense of much biology above the level of the cell. The idea that life evolves was not original with Darwin, but he argued it by far the most systematically, and the theory of how evolution works—by natural selection working on variation—was his own. 

Biochemistry has pushed Darwin s theory to the limit. It has done so by opening the ultimate black box, the cell, thereby making possible our understanding of how life works. It is the astonishing complexity of subcellular organic structures that has forced the question, How could all this have evolved To feel the brunt of the question—and to get a taste of what s in store for us—let s look at an example of a biochemical system. An explanation for the origin of a function must keep pace with contemporary science. Let s see how science s explanation... 

---