Workers compensation benefits

The practice of what is included in the wage amount is coordinated with the finding of the overhead. Fringe additions could include effects of paid holidays and vacations, health insurance and retirement benefits. Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) benefits, workers compensation, bonuses, gifts, uniforms, special benefits, profit sharing costs, education, and so on. 

Workers compensation benefits pay workers for medical expenses and lost wages due to occupational injury or illness. In exchange for carrying workers compensation insurance, companies are protected against legal... 

Labor benefits and burdens (Social Security, workers compensation, etc.) ... 

Finally, over the course of this chapter we have seen increasingly sophisticated attempts to overcome the problems which bedevil hedonic wage analysis. From simple, unadorned wage regressions we moved to partitioned samples, inclusion of workers compensation benefits, canonical correlation to test for implicit bias, and an estimation of the likelihood of job-switching to circumvent the difficulties connected with unemployment. It is true that these more refined methods yield results... 

Workers compensation is Just such a system. It provides mandatory no-fault disability and death coverage for injuries and, to a lesser extent, illnesses arising on the job, financed entirely by employer contributions. To the extent that it is experience-rated, each employer s payment into the system is equal to the anticipated claims of his or her workers (tt c). All of the provisions of workers compensation are well-known in particular, workers can know with a high degree of certainty with what likelihood and to what extent they will be compensated in the event of an accident on the job. Thus the conventional economic view, predicated on the market determination of wages and working conditions, predicts that neither employers nor workers should care one way or another about the existence of the workers compensation system or the benefits it provides. 

Like the other analysts who have examined the effect of workers compensation coverage on lost workdays, Moore and Viscusi assiune that any increase in workers sick time reflects a ripoff of the system (the problem of moral hazard ). There is an opposite possibility, however perhaps some workers who should take time off fail to do so when there are insufficient benefits to make this possible. Since this would also lead to a positive correlation between benefits and lost workdays it is impossible to know a priori how to interpret the empirical evidence. 

The company incurred 50 eye injuries in FY 1996 with a workers compensation cost of 200,000. The frequency of eye injuries escalated in FY 1997 to 85 injuries at an estimated cost of 400,000. Additionally, the 6 percent increase in workers compensation benefits passed by the legislature in FY 1997 takes effect in January 1998, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations require this program. 

Workplace incidents cause an enormous amount of physical, financial and emotional hardship for individual workers and their families. Combined with insufficient workers compensation benefits and inadequate medical insurance, woikplace injuries and illnesses can not only cause physical pain and suffering but also loss of employment and wages, burdensome debt, inability to maintain a previous standard of living, loss of home ownership and even bankruptcy. When implemented effectively, injury and illness prevention programs can help workers and their families avoid these disruptive and sometimes calanutous impacts on their lives. 

At the same time, these programs will help employers avoid the substantial cost impacts and business disruptions that accompany occupational injuries, illnesses and deaths. One widely-cited source regarding estimates of the magnitude of these costs is the Liberty Mutual Research Institute, which reports the direct cost of the most disabling workplace injuries in 2008 to be 53 billion (Liberty Mutual Research Institute 2010). Another source, the National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI), estimates the annual workers compensation benefits paid for all compensable injuries and illnesses in 2009 at 58 billion (National Academy of Social Insurance 2011). NASI further reports the total costs paid by employers for workers compensation increased from 60 billion in 2000 to 74 billion in 2009. 

National Academy of Social Insurance. (2011). Workers Compensation Benefits, Coverage, and Costs, 2009. 

Likewise, variations in HRM practices may change woiker safety behavior and the firm s safety costs. Consider the time path of injury benefits, shown in Figure 1.1, typical of workers compensation laws in most states—including Minnesota, from which we draw our sample for this study. 

Since output is fixed, the firm s economic problem is to minimize the sum of labor costs and safety costs. In this example, each foreman is paid 100,000 and each construction laborer is paid 40,000. Each accident costs 30,000 in terms of replacement labor and capital costs. These are the only costs associated with on-the-job accidents. Initially, suppose a workers compensation system is in place that only pays some of the lost wages after the waiting period, though the firm s HRM practices allow workers to use their sick-day benefits to replace their lost wages for the first three days following an injury. Hence, injured workers bear some costs of workplace injuries, though not any costs associated with the waiting period. 

Following this procedure, we merge firm-level data from the survey to claimant-level data from Miimesota s workers compensation files at the Department of Labor and Industry. Since costs are the product of claim fi equency, claim duration, and benefits, we partition our statistical analysis into claim frequency and claim duration components to see whether the HRM practices affect claim fi equency, claim duration, or both. This will provide evidence about whether costs are reduced either because of loss prevention effects (in that a particular practice reduces the number of claims) or loss control effects (in that a particular practice limits the costs of those injuries that have occurred). We assume that the benefit parameters (maximum and minimum benefits) are exogenous relative to the choices made by the firms in our survey and do not model benefit determination here. 

Real-wage replacement rate was used to capture both wage and expected workers compensation benefit effects on the dependent variable. In accordance with the Minnesota workers compensation law, rate was calculated by the following formula (Mirmesota WC income benefit schedule used 1992 analysis of workers compensation laws, U.S. Chamber of Commerce) ... 

It is worthwhile to reemphasize that our estimate of the reduction in workers compensation costs from engaging in these HRM practices is probably a lower bound estimate of the potential benefits. To the extent that the workplace is safer, either because physical risks have been reduced or because workers are taking more appropriate safety precautions, then some other accident costs are likely to be reduced as well. Uncompensated wage loss and pain and suffering associated with... 

NWSPELL Duration of nonwork spell days of temporary total disability benefits paid in the workers compensation system 55.78 140.91... 

Butler, Durbin, and Helvacian (1996) use this distinction between diffieult-to-monitor and easy-to-monitor injuries to explore whether soft-tissue injury elaims correlate with level of benefits and spread of HMOs. They find in their 10-year, 15-state sample of workers compensation claims that the proportion of claims attributable to soft-tissue injuries rose from 44.7 percent of all claims in 1980 to 50.6 percent in 1989. Concurrently, the share of costs attributable to soft-tissue injuries rose from 41 pereent to 48.8 percent. The share of costs for injuries that crush or fracture a bone—easy-to-monitor claims—is the only category that declined between 1980 and 1989. Using a multinomial logit model, the authors determine that most of the increase in soft-tissue injury is attributable to the expansion of HMOs. Specifically, they ascribe the rise in such injuries to moral hazard response by HMO providers, who increase their revenue by classifying as woik-related injuries as many health conditions as possible. ... 

---