Basic Framework of Theoretical Chemistry

Let us look into a little more detailed aspects of the cmrent and future perspective for chemical d3mamics. As noted above, the foimdations of theoretical chemistry were already established in the 1920 s (both the papers of Born-Oppenheimer and Heitler London were published in 1927) and 1930 s (Landau and Zener published in 1932, and the transition state theory of Eyring and Evans-Polan3d was almost simultaneously launched in 1935), and even today the basic framework remains essentially the same. However, there are many reasons we need to promote the electronic-state theory into the realm of d3mamical electron theory by taking explicit account of time t in it. Below are listed some of the current attempts to achieve this goal. 

Mendeleev s powerful insight. For many chemists, the periodic table was the last theoretical tool they needed, since the table made clear the framework of matter. There would be much more work done refining and adding data to the table over the next century, but the basic principles were set. The discovery of the missing elements and the addition of the noble gases confirmed the truth of the periodic law and the utility of the table. John Newlands, whose work had identified many of the periodic properties of the elements, was eventually awarded the Davy Medal by the Royal Society in 1887, and, in 1998, the Royal Society of Chemistry unveiled a plaque at his birthplace acknowledging his discovery of the periodic law. 

The spatial distribution of the electron cloud in a molecular system is investigated quantitatively through the single-particle electron density,which has served as a basic variable in the so-called density functional theory (DFT), an approach that bypasses the many-electron wavefunction, which is the usual vehicle in conventional quantum chemistry or electronic structure theory (for a review of modem developments in quantum chemistry, see reference 7). The theoretical framework of DFT is well known for the associated conceptual simplicity as well as for the computational economy it offers. Another equally important aspect of DFT is its ability to rationalize the existing concepts in chemistry as well as to give birth to newer concepts, which has led to the important field of conceptual DFT. ... 

Quantum electrodynamics is the fundamental physical theory which obeys the principles of special relativity and allows us to describe the mutual interactions of electrons and photons. It is intrinsically a many-particle theory, although much too complicated from a numerical point of view to be the basis for the theoretical framework of the molecular sciences. Nonetheless, it is the basic theory of chemistry and its essential concepts, and ingredients are introduced in this chapter. 

In the last 130 years, chemistry has focused its attention on the behavior of molecules and their construction from the atoms. Atoms are held together in molecules by chemical bonds [1]. This is within the framework of the theoretical of atoms-in-molecules. From a modem point of view, the chemical bond has been designed using theoretical methods based on the quantum mechanical ab initio for molecules isolated with high accuracy by comparing the results with high-resolution spectroscopies [2, 3]. The basic and fundamental unit that we call molecule is interpreted with some detail. However, in the last three decades chemists have moved beyond the atomic and molecular chemistry towards the area of supramolecular chemistry [4—6]. This new area is in the central part of the bottom-up approaches to... 

Since the scientist will always be in a better position to use numerical techniques and software effectively if he understands some of the basic theoretical background, the n imerical procedures considered in this chapter are not treated free of mathematical context as it is usually done in text books about theoretical chemistry, but rather they are imbedded in a mathematical framework. In this sense the chapter is started by an exploration of some mathematical quantities that describe geometrical features of a PES. Properties that allow to classify the stationary points (i.e. points at which the gradient vanishes) of an energy functional are also given. The chapter is finished by some considerations pertaining to the critical points (i.e. points at which the determinant of the Hessian matrix vanishes) of energy functionals. 

In this review we put less emphasis on the physics and chemistry of surface processes, for which we refer the reader to recent reviews of adsorption-desorption kinetics which are contained in two books [2,3] with chapters by the present authors where further references to earher work can be found. These articles also discuss relevant experimental techniques employed in the study of surface kinetics and appropriate methods of data analysis. Here we give details of how to set up models under basically two different kinetic conditions, namely (/) when the adsorbate remains in quasi-equihbrium during the relevant processes, in which case nonequilibrium thermodynamics provides the needed framework, and (n) when surface nonequilibrium effects become important and nonequilibrium statistical mechanics becomes the appropriate vehicle. For both approaches we will restrict ourselves to systems for which appropriate lattice gas models can be set up. Further associated theoretical reviews are by Lombardo and Bell [4] with emphasis on Monte Carlo simulations, by Brivio and Grimley [5] on dynamics, and by Persson [6] on the lattice gas model. 

Major emphasis is placed on the reactions of metal complexes in solution undergoing either inner-sphere ligand substitution or electron transfer to and from the metal center. Such studies relate to the important selective role of metal catalysts in many areas of enzymatic, commercial, and modem synthetic chemistry. Clearly, this field has now matured to the point where basic theoretical considerations, although incomplete, can provide a logical framework for understanding the chemical reactivity of such systems and stimulate the investigation of (1) new and unique reaction pathways, (2) modified reagents, and (3) unorthodox matrices. 

If there were a flag that represented the science of chemistry, it would be the periodic table. The periodic table is a concise organizational chart of the elements. The periodic table not only summarizes important facts about the elements, but it also incorporates a theoretical framework for understanding the relationships between elements. The modern periodic table attests to human s search for order and patterns in nature. As such, the periodic table is a dynamic blueprint for the basic building blocks of our universe. This chapter examines the development of the modern periodic table and presents information on how the modem periodic table is organized. 

The reader should be cautioned that understanding the fission process represents a very difficult problem. Some of the best minds in chemistry and physics have worked on the problem since the discovery of fission. Yet, while we understand many aspects of the fission process, there is no overall theoretical framework that gives a satisfactory account of the basic observations. 

The first two examples both involved the creation of cationic species on an acidic zeolite. In both cases we did not need to model the interaction of the cation with the zeolite framework good agreement was obtained with just calculation of the isolated cation. Apparently, the cation is not strongly perturbed by the presence of the zeolite. Such fortunate circumstances are rare. Here we show an example of how theoretical NMR calculations can help elucidate chemistry on a basic metal oxide surface, in particular, the adsorption of acetylene on MgO (26). For this study we needed to model the active sites of the catalyst, for which there are many possibilities. It is assumed the reactive sites are those in which Mg and O are substantially less coordinated than in the bulk. Comer sites are those in which Mg or O are three-coordinate, whereas Edge sites have four-fold coordination. These sites are where the strongest binding of the adsorbates are obtained. 

Chemistry and the molecular sciences start with the many-particle theories of physics part III of the book deals with these many-electron extensions of the theoretical framwork, which have their foundations in the one-electron framework presented in part II. The first chapter in part III is on the most general many-electron theory known in physics quantum electrodynamics (QED). From the point of view of physics this is the fundamental theory of chemistry, although far too complicated to be used for calculations on systems with more than a few electrons. Standard chemistry does not require all features covered by QED (such as pair creation), and so neither does a basic and at the same time practical theory of chemistry. Three subsequent chapters describe the suitable approximations, which provide a first-quantized theory for many-electron systems with a, basically, fixed number of particles. A major result from this discussion is the fact that this successful model is still plagued by practical as well as by conceptual difficulties. As a consequence further simplifications are introduced, which eliminate the conceptual difficulties these simplifications are discussed in part IV. 

---