Barrier correlation induced

Irritant contact dermatitis is a public health problem. Skin exposure to irritants (e.g., water, detergents, and solvents) causes damage to the barrier and induces an inflammation, ultimately contact dermatitis.43 By combining microprobe analysis with other techniques it is possible to correlate physiological changes (e.g., barrier repair processes) with effects on the keratinocytes. In a series... 

Correlation diagrams for the two modes of parallel approach are shown in Figures 7.37b and 7.37c. If the CO bond is formed first, the (n,fl ) excited reactant states correlate with highly excited (n,Oco) states of the products and a correlation-induced barrier results. Hence this reaction is electronically forbidden (Figure 7.37b). If, however, the CC bond is formed first, the unpaired electron at the oxygen can be localized in a p AO with either a or ji symmetry, that is, either in the or in the no orbital. Since the... 

A different view of the OMT process is that the molecule, M, is fully reduced, M , or oxidized, M+, during the tunneling process [25, 26, 92-95]. In this picture a fully relaxed ion is formed in the junction. The absorption of a phonon (the creation of a vibrational excitation) then induces the ion to decay back to the neutral molecule with emission (or absorption) of an electron - which then completes tunneling through the barrier. For simplicity, the reduction case will be discussed in detail however, the oxidation arguments are similar. A transition of the type M + e —> M is conventionally described as formation of an electron affinity level. The most commonly used measure of condensed-phase electron affinity is the halfwave reduction potential measured in non-aqueous solvents, Ey2. Often these values are tabulated relative to the saturated calomel electrode (SCE). In order to correlate OMTS data with electrochemical potentials, we need them referenced to an electron in the vacuum state. That is, we need the potential for the half reaction ... 

In addition to the electronic difference between PR3 and PH3, bulkier ligands on the phosphine can change the reaction through their steric effect. Using the R = Bu on the anthraphos system, Haenel et al. calculated the available molecular surface (AMS) around the metal center as a measure of the space available to the alkane (13b). They correlated the AMS to the relative reactivities of the catalysts and the results show that two bulky tert-butyl groups on each P certainly limit the access to the metal center, and thus, may reduce the reactivity. Other theoretical studies on the pincer complexes showed that this steric contribution/ limitation plays a less important role than the activation barriers introduced by the catalyst itself (22), where the increase in energy barrier induced by the bulky 4Bu is smaller than the original barriers calculated... 

The effect of a surfactant on skin depends on the type of surfactant as described earlier. Wilhelm et al. demonstrated the irritation potential of anionic surfactants.21 They evaluated the effects of sodium salts of n-alkyl sulfates with variable carbon chain length on TEWL and found that a C12 analog gave a maximum response. They suggested that the mechanisms responsible for the hydration of SC are related to the irritation properties of the surfactants. Leveque et al. also suggested22 that the hyperhydration of SC is consecutive to the inflammation process. They demonstrated that the increase of TEWL was induced by SDS without removal of SC lipids. SDS might influence not only SC barrier function, but also the nucleated layer of epidermis and dermal system associated with inflammation.23 Recently, no correlation was found between the level of epidermal hyperplasia and TEWL increase on the SDS-irritated skin.23 Further work would be needed to determine the effects of surfactants on skin. 

---