Atrazine study

In our studies to date, the compounds in which oral and dermal studies were done have shown qualitative similarities in urine metabolic patterns. This was noted in the methyl ethyl aniline, CGA-73102, methidathion and atrazine studies discussed in this paper. Thus, based upon our experience, there is no reason to believe that major metabolic differences occur due to oral vs. dermal treatment routes. As noted by Pannatier et al ( ), specific examples of skin metabolism are scarce, except for steroid hormones. 

These high levels were sporadic and transitory. However, some of them were high enough to have caused phytotoxicity, and more work needs to be done to establish whether herbicides are having adverse effects upon populations of aquatic plants in areas highlighted in this study. It should also be borne in mind that there may have been additive or synergistic effects caused by the combinations of herbicides found in these samples. For example, urea herbicides such as diuron and chlortoluron act upon photosynthesis by a common mechanism, so it seems likely that any effects upon aquatic plants will be additive. Similarly, simazine and atrazine share a common mechanism of action. 

More controversially, endocrine disruption as a consequence of exposure to the herbicide atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamine-6-isopropylamine-s-triazine), one of the most widely used herbicides in the world, has also been hypothesized to explain various adverse biological effects in frog populations in the United States. Exposure to atrazine in the laboratory at high concentrations, far exceeding those found in the natural environment, has been reported to induce external deformities in the anuran species Rana pipiens, Rana sylvatica, and Bufo americanus (Allran and Karasov 2001). Studies by Hayes et al. have suggested that atrazine can induce hermaphroditism in amphibians at environmentally relevant concentrations (Hayes et al. 2002 Hayes et al. 2003). Laboratory studies with atrazine also indicated the herbicide... 

The persistence of the N-nitrosamine that may be formed in soil will depend on a host of conditions, such as soil type, organic matter content, clay content, pH, the microflora present in the soil, moisture content and temperature, etc. Superimposed on all these factors will be the chemical nature of the pesticide. The N-nitrosoatrazine ( ) formed in soil from the herbicide atrazine ( ) was shown to be rapidly disappeared (1). Thus, in soil W-nitrosoatrazine was observed after one week, but was absent 4 and 10 weeks later (Table IV). In contrast, N-nitroso-butralin (11 ) persisted much longer than N-nitrosoatrazine (9) under the same conditions (Table V) and was still detectable after 6 months (3). Our studies demonstrated that N-nitrosoglyphosate is persistent in the soil. Fox soil treated with 20 ppm of nitrite nitrogen and 740 ppm glyphosate contained about 7 ppm of N-nitrosoglyphosate even after 140 days (6). 

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is generally used for the extraction of selected analytes from solid sample matrices, but applications have been reported for aqueous samples. In one study, recoveries of 87-100% were obtained for simazine, propazine, and trietazine at the 0.05 ug mL concentration level using methanol-modified CO2 (10%, v/v) to extract the analytes, previously preconcentrated on a C-18 Empore extraction disk. The analysis was performed using LC/UV detection. Freeze-dried water samples were subjected to SFE for atrazine and simazine, and the optimum recoveries were obtained using the mildest conditions studied (50 °C, 20 MPa, and 30 mL of CO2). In some cases when using LEE and LC analysis, co-extracted humic substances created interference for the more polar metabolites when compared with SFE for the preparation of the same water sample. ... 

In another study, catfish samples were homogenized in ethyl acetate, and the residues were partitioned into acetonitrile and petroleum ether, subjected to C-18 SPE purification, and analyzed using LC/UV detection. "" Quantitative recoveries were obtained for atrazine, simazine, and propazine in the 12.5-100 lagkg concentration range. 

Applicators, mixers, loaders, and others who mix, spray, or apply pesticides to crops face potential dermal and/or inhalation exposure when handling bulk quantities of the formulated active ingredients. Although the exposure periods are short and occur only a few times annually, an estimate of this exposure can be obtained by quantifying the excreted polar urinary metabolites. Atrazine is the most studied triazine for potential human exposure purposes, and, therefore, most of the reported methods address the determination of atrazine or atrazine and its metabolites in urine. To a lesser extent, methods are also reported for the analysis of atrazine in blood plasma and serum. 

Pesticides contaminate not only surface water, but also ground water and aquifers. By 1990 in the USSR, 15% of all pesticides used were detected in underground water [29]. Pesticides were detected in 86% of samples of underground water in Ukraine in 1986-87 (including DDT and its metabolites, HCH, dimethoate, phosalone, methyl parathion, malathion, trichlorfon, simazin, atrazine, and prometrin). In actual fact, the number of pesticides was apparently larger, but the laboratory was able to determine the content of only 30 of the 200 pesticides used at that time in Ukraine [29]. In the 1960s, in the Tashkent and Andizhan oblasts of Uzbekistan, the methylmercaptophos content in the water of studied well shafts was, by clearly underestimated data, 0.03 mg/l (MPC was 0.01 mg/l), of DDT was 0.6 mg/l (MPC was 0.1 mg/ I), and of HCH was 0.41 mg/l (MPC was 0.02 mg/l) [A49]. 

---