Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Atom layer table

Metallic alloys may be divided into two types those which form ordered bulk phases (such as NiAl) and those which are substitutionally disordered in the bulk. Table 3 presents the structural information for the surfaces of alloys which are disordered in the bulk. In addition to the relaxation of the atomic planes observed in clean monatomic metal surfaces, alloys possess an additional degree of structural freedom the segregation profile at the selvedge. Table 3 shows that the majority of alloy surfaces display a significant deviation from the bulk composition in the first three or four atomic layers. For example, the surfaces of the PtNi alloys display segregation of Pt into the first atomic layer. Table 4 presents the analogous structural information for alloys which form ordered bulk phases. [Pg.12]

Figure 3 compares the atom layer tables for two substituents. Although compound II differs from I only by the removal of one atom, there are six changes in the tables (in bold) the neutral amide HBA in I becomes a basic amine in II, and the phenolic oxygen, which had been acidic owing to the electron withdrawing carbonyl in I, is a neutral HBD without it in II. This... [Pg.81]

Figure 3 An atom layer table for a substituent is made by summing each of several properties for ail non-hydrogen atoms at a given bond count distance (leftmost columns) from the scaffold backbone (BB), including radii, acids, bases, H-bond donors (HBDs), H-bond acceptors (HBAs), and aromatics. Two tables are compared element by element, and the sum of the minima divided by the sum of the maxima gives the similarity between the substituents. Figure 3 An atom layer table for a substituent is made by summing each of several properties for ail non-hydrogen atoms at a given bond count distance (leftmost columns) from the scaffold backbone (BB), including radii, acids, bases, H-bond donors (HBDs), H-bond acceptors (HBAs), and aromatics. Two tables are compared element by element, and the sum of the minima divided by the sum of the maxima gives the similarity between the substituents.
Atom-kem, m. atomic nucleus, -kette,/. chain of atoms, atomic chain, -lage, /. atomic layer atomic position, -lehre, /, doctrine of atoms, atomic theory, -mechanik, /. mechanics of the atom, -modell, n, atomic model, -nummer, /, atomic number, -ord-nung, /. atomic arrangement, -refraktion, /. atomic refraction, -rest, m. atomic residue (= Atomrumpf). -ring, m. ring of atoms, -rumpf, m. atomic residue or core (remainder of an atom, as after removal of some electrons), -schale, /, atomic shell, -strabl, m. atomic ray, -tafel, /, atomic table, atomtbeoretisch, a. of or according to the atomic theory,... [Pg.37]

Sodium Guide Star Brightness. From the properties of the Na atom and the Na layer (Table 1), we can estimate the power needed for the AO system. Assuming isotropic emission and no saturation, the photon flux F of the LGS observed with the WFS is given by ... [Pg.220]

CdS growth, by EC-ALE, has been studied by more groups than any other compound (Table 1) [111, 123, 143, 145, 154, 163, 165, 167-169, 172, 186], Initial EC-ALE studies by this group of CdS were performed with a TLEC (Figure 13), to determine potentials for a cycle [145]. Cd and S coverages were determined coulometrically for deposits as a function of the numbers of cycles performed. The dependence of thickness on the Cd deposition potential, for CdS deposits, revealed a plateau between —0.3 and —0.55 V, with the best deposits formed at —0.5 V, using a 10 mM CdSCL solution, pH 5.9 and an 11 mM, pH 11 Na2S solution. Reductive UPD was used for the Cd atomic layers and oxidative UPD for S. [Pg.45]

If you move left one column in the periodic table from the halides, the chalcogenides need two electrons to complete their valence shell, and thus can bond to the surface and each other simultaneously. This appears to account for much of the interesting surface chemistry of chalcogenide atomic layers. Chalcogenides, including oxides (corrosion), are some of the most studied systems in surface chemistry. The oxides are clearly the most important, but significant amounts of work have been done with sulfur, selenium and tellurium. [Pg.64]

There are great similarities between the atomic layer structures formed by Te, Se and S on the low index planes of Au [238]. Table 2 shows a listing of structures... [Pg.64]

Given the efforts in this group and others (Table 1) to form the Cd based II-VI compounds, studies of the formation of Cd atomic layers are of great interest. The most detailed structural studies of Cd UPD have, thus far, been published by Gewirth et al. [270-272]. They have obtained in-situ STM images of uniaxial structures formed during the UPD of Cd on Au(lll), from 0.1 M sulfuric acid solutions. They have also performed extensive chronocoulometric and quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) studies of Cd UPD from sulfate. They have concluded that the structures observed with STM were the result of interactions between deposited Cd and the sulfate electrolyte. However, they do not rule out a contribution from surface reconstructions in accounting for the observed structures. [Pg.84]

The electrochemical atomic layer epitaxy (ECALE) technique, also known as electrochemical atomic layer deposition (EC-ALD), is based on layer-by-layer electrodeposition. Each constituent of the thin him are deposited separately using underpotential deposition (UPD) of that element. UPD is a process wherein an atomic layer of one element is deposited on the surface of a different element at a potential under that needed to deposit the element on itself. ECALE has been used to grow mainly II-VI and III-V compounds. A thorough review of ECALE research has been published by Stickney.144 A summary of the materials deposited using ECALE are given in Table 8.4, with a more detailed discussion for a few select examples given below. [Pg.268]

Figure 11 is a series of voltammograms for the deposition of Zn on atomic layers of Te, Se, and S. A definite trend in the Zn UPD peak potentials is evident, going up the periodic table. Zn is hardest to deposit on the Te atomic layer, where deposition is not initiated until -0.7 V. A well-defined Zn UPD peak is evident on the Se layer, initiated near -0.5 V, while Zn deposition on the S atomic layer begins near -0.3 V. These numbers are consistent with differences in the free energies of formation of the three compounds -115.2, -173.6, and -200.0 kJ/mole for ZnTe, ZnSe, and ZnS respectively [310]. For a two-electron process, these differences in the stabilities of the compounds correspond to 0.30 V and 0.14 V, respectively, in line with the shifts observed in Fig. 11. [Pg.109]

ZnS(llO) surface consists of parallel zigzag chains with equal numbers of zinc and sulphur ions (see Fig. 9.12(a)). It is a charge neutral surface. Relaxation of the ZnS (110) surface has been performed using GGA with CASTER Some pioneering works show that there is a negligible displacement of ions below the second and third atomic layer. Therefore, in relaxation calculation, only the atoms on the first layer of the surface are allowed to move. The surface structure and ionic displacement vectors for the (110) surface are shown in Fig. 9.12(b). Ionic displacements due to surface relaxation are presented in Table 9.5. [Pg.232]

There are of course many other similarities and differences, and some of them are listed in Table 5.1 without further explanations. In general, STM is very versatile and flexible. Especially with the development of the atomic force microscope (AFM), materials of poor electrical conductivity can also be imaged. There is the potential of many important applications. A critically important factor in STM and AFM is the characterization of the probing tip, which can of course be done with the FIM. FIM, with its ability to field evaporate surface atoms and surface layers one by one, and the capability of single atom chemical analysis with the atom-probe FIM (APFIM), also finds many applications, especially in chemical analysis of materials on a sub-nanometer scale. It should be possible to develop an STM-FIM-APFIM system where the sample to be scanned in STM is itself an FIM tip so that the sample can either be thermally treated or be field evaporated to reach into the bulk or to reach to an interface inside the sample. After the emitter surface is scanned for its atomic structure, it can be mass analyzed in the atom-probe for one atomic layer,... [Pg.376]

The number of superimposed atom layers can be estimated on the following basis. According to Beeck and others (29), metal films condensed at low temperature in a high vacuum and warmed to room temperature are composed of crystallites with different orientations. The mirrors obtained in this way show the same optical behavior as crystalline compact material (47), especially after annealing in a high vacuum at an elevated temperature. The temperature coefficient of resistance, too, even that of the transparent nickel films in Table I, has the same order of magnitude as that of the compact metal therefore, it seems correct to use the atomic volume of the crystalline metals for estimating the... [Pg.319]

Atoms at solid surfaces have missing neighbors on one side. Driven by this asymmetry the topmost atoms often assume a structure different from the bulk. They might form dimers or more complex structures to saturate dangling bonds. In the case of a surface relaxation the lateral or in-plane spacing of the surface atoms remains unchanged but the distance between the topmost atomic layers is altered. In metals for example, we often find a reduced distance for the first layer (Table 8.1). The reason is the presence of a dipole layer at the metal surface that results from the distortion of the electron wavefunctions at the surface. [Pg.147]

To be examined by ophcal microscopy, a material must, of course, be opaque to visible hght, for its surface to be observed. Contrasts in the produced image are as a result of differences in the reflechvity of the various regions of the microstmcture. Given the penetrahon depths hsted in Table 2.1, it is obvious that not only light, but also electrons, probe just the surfaces (the top-most atomic layers), whereas neutrons and X-rays provide information about the bulk. Hence, light and electron beams are used in microscopes for examining solid surfaces. Because it is well known that the surface crystalline stmc-ture of a sohd may differ from that of the bulk, the surfaces of most samples are usually... [Pg.60]

Table 4 Surface relaxations in the outermost atomic layers of the (111) surface (for M on top of O, site), reported for two different metal coverages 6= and 0.25 ML, Surface displacements are calculated as the difference of the ideal (111) surface and the relaxed geometry of the Pd and Pt/Zr02 interfaces. Negative and positive values indicates inwardly and outwardly displacements, respectively. For 0=0.25 ML, O., denotes the surface ion to which an metal atom is bound, while Oj represent the non-bound surface oxygens equivalent notation for the other surface layers. Displacements are given in A. Table 4 Surface relaxations in the outermost atomic layers of the (111) surface (for M on top of O, site), reported for two different metal coverages 6= and 0.25 ML, Surface displacements are calculated as the difference of the ideal (111) surface and the relaxed geometry of the Pd and Pt/Zr02 interfaces. Negative and positive values indicates inwardly and outwardly displacements, respectively. For 0=0.25 ML, O., denotes the surface ion to which an metal atom is bound, while Oj represent the non-bound surface oxygens equivalent notation for the other surface layers. Displacements are given in A.
The composition of the outermost atomic layers of the pore walls deviates consid -iv.i.-i from the overall average concentrations. Auger electron spectroscopic (AF.S) measure ments on an industrial catalyst (BASF S 6-10) have shown that a significant enrkbiner.i of the promoters into the surface results using the unreduced as well as die reduced catalyst [109] (see Table 17). The free iron surface of the reduced BASF catalyst [109] and Topsoe catalyst KM-I [254] comprises only a fraction of the total surface, as could be deduced from the results of prior investigations [157], [255]-[261]. [Pg.41]

For simulations that included a carbon support, a graphite surface was modeled four atomic layers deep with rigidly held carbon atoms. LJ potentials were used to describe their interaction with other atoms in the system through the parameters Gc = 3.4 A and 8c/k = 28.0 K. For simulations that included a catalyst surface, [100] Pt was modeled six atomic layers deep and was also held rigid and used the parameters apt = 2.41 A and Spt/k = 2336.0 K. The positions of carbon and Pt were taken from the literature. The number of graphite and Pt atoms used at various water contents is listed in Table 1. [Pg.143]


See other pages where Atom layer table is mentioned: [Pg.81]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.744]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.744]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.401]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.82 ]




SEARCH



Atom layer

Atomic layers

© 2024 chempedia.info