Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

ASTM Standard Practice

ASTM, Standard practice for evaluating environmental fate models of chemicals, Annual Book of ASTM Standard, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), E978-84, Philadelphia, PA, 1984. [Pg.854]

ASTM, Standard practice for conducting bioconcentration tests with fishes and saltwater bivalve molluscs. E1022-84. ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1985. [Pg.912]

Panels of high strength aluminum alloy (7075-T6) were used in this study. The panels were approximately 10 x 3 x 0.032 inch (25 x 7.5 x 0.08 cm) in size. The test environments for coating evaluation were (1) a 5% NaCl spray (fog) chamber according to ASTM Standard Method of Salt Spray (Fog) Testing (B117-73), and (2) a modified 5% NaCl/S02 spray (fog) chamber with SO gas introduced periodically - ASTM Standard Practice for Modified Salt Spray (Fog) Testing (G85-84(A4)). In the latter case, a constant spray of 5% NaCl was maintained in the chamber and SO2 was introduced for one hour four tines a day (every 6 hours)( ). Coated test panels were examined for corrosion after one- and two- eek exposure periods. [Pg.212]

ASTM Standard Practices for Designing a Process for Cleaning Technical Glasses, ASTM C 912, pt. 17, 1980. [Pg.318]

ASTM. Standard practice for infrared, multivariate, quantitative analysis, Global Engineering Documents, Philadelphia, 1995. [Pg.353]

ASTM, Standard Practice for Liquid Chromatography Terms and Relationships, ANSI/ASTM E 682-79, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1979. [Pg.168]

Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Practice for Operating Salt Spray (Fog) Testing Apparatus, B117-95, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1995. [Pg.117]

ASTM, Standard practice for Evaluating mathematical Models for the Environmental Fate of Chemicals , Designation E 978- 92, Committee E-47 on Biological Effects and Environmental Fate, ASTM Committee on Standards, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, Approved Feb. 15, 1992. [Pg.302]

There are two ASTM standard practices on segregation test methods (51,52). These testers are designed to isolate specific mechanisms, and test a materiafs tendency to segregate by that method. A brief description of these test methods follows. [Pg.143]

As a number of other organisms may be of specific interest for certain polymeric materials, other pure cultures of organisms may be used in accordance with the ASTM standard practice. [Pg.440]

ASTM, Standard practice for coding plastic manufactured articles for resin identification, ASTM D7611/D7611M -13, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2013)... [Pg.417]

ASTM D792-91 voltage (ASTM standard practice ASTM C518) (flexural) and (ASTM D6420-99 ... [Pg.348]

TABLE 5— ASTM standard practices in A 262 for detecting susceptibility to intergranular corrosion in austenitic stainless steels. [Pg.252]

TABLE 6—ASTM standard practices in A 763 for detecting susceptibility to intergranular attack in ferritic stainless steels. [Pg.252]

J. Workman, The First ASTM Standard Practice for NIR Multivariate Quantitative Analysis, NIR News, 9 5-6 (1998). [Pg.150]

American Society of Testing Materiak (ASTM). Standard practice for human engineering design for marine systems, equipment and facilities. West Conshohocken, PA ASTM 2007. [Pg.311]

In this test, small spots of the adhesive are placed onto a substrate. Surface preparation, application procedures, and curing conditions are to be as similar as possible to those used in the quantitative test and/or the actual adhesively bonded Joint. The adhesive spots are allowed to cure according to the manufacturers specifications. To test adhesion, this ASTM standard practice recommends the use of a thin stainless steel spatula or similar probe as a prying lever to assess the relative difficulty of removing the adhesive from the substrate. If the results are acceptable, standard quantitative adhesive test procedures can be used to obtain quantitative measurement of the adhesive s performance. [Pg.199]

The conclusion is that, because sample damage cannot be fully ruled out. quotation of a damage index as defined above may improve significantly the traceable quality of analytical data. The requirements of the ASTM standard practice E1015-90 [11] could be met in this way. [Pg.753]

PFE/PLE extraction is internationally accepted by the regulatory bodies, among others by the US EPA SW-846 Method 3545A, which can be used in place of Methods 3540, 3541, 3550 and 8151, by the US Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) statement of work (SOW) OLM04.2, the Chinese method GB/T 19649-2005 and German Method LOO.00-34 both for pesticides, also the ASTM Standard Practice D-7210 for additives in polymers andD-7567 for gel content of polyolefins. [Pg.22]


See other pages where ASTM Standard Practice is mentioned: [Pg.474]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.1064]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.1093]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.752]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.767]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.323 , Pg.326 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.323 , Pg.326 ]




SEARCH



ASTM

© 2024 chempedia.info