Association, variables correlation coefficient

Figure 2.15(a) shows the relationship between and Cp for the component characteristics analysed. Note, there are six points at q = 9, Cp = 0. The correlation coefficient, r, between two sets of variables is a measure of the degree of (linear) association. A correlation coefficient of 1 indicates that the association is deterministic. A negative value indicates an inverse relationship. The data points have a correlation coefficient, r = —0.984. It is evident that the component manufacturing variability risks analysis is satisfactorily modelling the occurrence of manufacturing variability for the components tested. 

In regression there is a dependence of one variable on another. In correlation we also consider the relationship between two variables, but neither is assumed to be functionally dependent on the other. The strength of the association or correlation between the variables is given by the correlation coefficient r, also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient -. 

Numerically, correlation coefficients can range from -1 to +1. A value of -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship as one variable increases, the other decreases in a precise linear fashion. A value of 0 indicates a complete lack of linear association between two variables. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear relationship as one variable increases, the other increases in a precisely linear fashion. (The technique of correlation cannot meaningfully describe nonlinear patterns of association between two variables, such as curvilinear and exponential relationships.)... 

While a large magnitude correlation coefficient calculated for two variables indicates a strong association between them, it does not make any statement about a causal relationship. That is, it does not imply a cause-and-effect relationship. There may indeed be such a relationship between the variables, but this cannot be determined from knowledge of the correlation coefficient alone. It is entirely possible that a third variable is systematically influencing both variables and is responsible for the strong correlation that is evident between them. 

ICE was developed for estimating acute toxicity of chemicals to species where data are lacking. Interspecies correlations were created for 95 aquatic and terrestrial organisms using least squares regression where both variables are random (i.e., both variables are independent and subject to measurement error Asfaw et al. 2004). The correlation coefficient (r) is used to describe the linear association amongst the... 

A significant correlation coefficient can be taken as an indication of association between two variables, but it is important to realize that this does not automatically imply causation. 

In some instances the interest may not be in predicting the dependent variable y from the independent variable x but in determining whether they are associated. In these cases the correlation coefficient (the degree of dependence between two variables) may be calculated by either parametric or nonparametric methods, depending on the data. ... 

A related quantity is the multiple correlation coefficient R defined as the square root of R. It is a measure of linear association between the observed response and the estimated response, i.e. the response obtained by a linear combination of the predictor variables in a linear regression model. A quantity complementary to is the coefficient of nondetermination defined as ... 

Table 3 shows results of recorded fluorescence emission intensity as a function of concentration of quinine sulphate in acidic solutions. These data are plotted in Figure 3 with regression lines calculated from least squares estimated lines for a linear model, a quadratic model and a cubic model. The correlation for each fitted model with the experimental data is also given. It is obvious by visual inspection that the straight line represents a poor estimate of the association between the data despite the apparently high value of the correlation coefficient. The observed lack of fit may be due to random errors in the measured dependent variable or due to the incorrect use of a linear model. The latter is the more likely cause of error in the present case. This is confirmed by examining the differences between the model values and the actual results. Figure 4. With the linear model, the residuals exhibit a distinct pattern as a function of concentration. They are not randomly distributed as would be the case if a more appropriate model was employed, e.g. the quadratic function. 

For a set of data to which regression analysis can be used, the correlation coefficient (a measure of linear association between two variables) can also be calculated using the formula ... 

The correlation between observations made at different times (autocorrelation) is described mathematically by computing the autocorrelation function, the degree of correlation between observations made k time units apart k = 1,2, ). The correlation coefficient is a measure of the linear association between two variables. It does not describe a cause-and-effect relation. The autocorrelation depends on sampling interval. Most statistical and mathematical software packages include routines for computing correlation and autocorrelation. 

The D(At) values were approximated by a power function, D(At) = a0(At)b. The following values for the parameters were obtained a0 0.7 m and b 0.86. The correlation coefficient was 0.965. The scatter of the points relative to the approximating function could be caused by variations in the oil discharge rate associated, for example, with the variable amount of oil in cleaning waters pumped out from different tanks. The decreased width values in area D were, most likely, due to a spill s disturbance by a... 

Related to the coefficient of determination is the correlation coefficient, p, which is almost exclusively used in the association between two variables, X and Y. In relation to goodness of fit, X is the observed dependent variable, e.g., plasma drug concentrations, and Y is the model predicted dependent variable, e.g., predicted plasma drug concentrations, such as the plot shown in Figure 8. In the case of two variables p has maximum likelihood estimator... 

The correlation coefficients for Eqs. (9) and (10) were 0.991 and 0.920, respectively the latter can be further improved by introducing an additional variable [98], The reason that Fs,min alone is not quite as effective for representing basicity as is Fs.max for acidity may involve the fact that the latter is always near a hydrogen whereas the former is associated with various acceptor atoms in the molecules investigated. A pleasing feature of Eqs. (9) and (10) is that they satisfy different classes of compounds that is, they are not family-dependent. 

As noted earlier, the multiple partial coefficient of determination, r, usually is more of interest than the multiple partial correlation coefficient, because of its direct applicability. That is, an = 0.83 explains 83% of the variability. An r = 0.83 cannot be directly interpreted, except the closer to 0 the value is, the smaller the association the closer r is to 1, the greater the association. The coefficient of determination computation is straightforward. From the model, F = /3o + IB Xi + 2 2 + 3X3 + 4X4, suppose that the researcher wants to compute x x, X2>y or the joint contributiOTi of X3 and X4 to the model with Xi and X2 held constant. The form would be... 

---