Assessment of mixture quality

From the previous classification of mixing problems in section 1.1 it will be clear to the reader that the term mixing covers much more than processes in which non-uniformities in composition are reduced. This latter type of operation, e.g. the blending of miscible liquids or powder mixing, are both duties for which a method of evaluation of mixture quality is necessary to 

In areas such as miscible liquid blending, the formation of emulsions, solid dispersions such as paints, and dry powder mixing, it is understandable, therefore, that several criteria have been developed to assess mixture quality . It is unfortunate that of the many definitions presently available for mixture quality, in solid or liquid mixtures, none is universally applicable. In the case of powder mixing, further details may be found in Chapter 2, while for liquid mixing more information is presented in Chapters 8 and 10 for mechanically agitated vessels. Chapter 9 for Jet mixers and Chapter 12 for in-line static mixers. 

The above limitation of the detection volume is a major drawback in attempts to measure mixture quality, particularly towards the end of a mixing 

---

Thus the quantities of scale and intensity of segregation are useful concepts in the understanding of high viscosity mixing. However, difficulties are encountered in the measurement of these parameters to give quantitative assessments of mixture quality. This is particularly true as one approaches a well-mixed state. 

Multi-component hydrocarbon standards to provide accurate calibration of instruments (generally gas chromatographs) used to monitor the concentrations of a wide range of volatile organic hydrocarbon compounds (VOCs) in ambient air. These standards currently contain 30 different hydrocarbon species that are important to photochemical ozone formation, with concentrations ranging down to a few parts per billion by molar value. They are disseminated widely in the United Kingdom and the rest of Europe as calibration standards, and as test mixtures for assessment of the quality of international ambient hydrocarbon measurements (often under the auspices of the European Commission - EC). 

The lack of methods for a fast and reliable assessment of membrane quality is stiU one of the outstanding issues in zeolite membrane development. The usual meaning of the term quality relates to the ability of the membrane to carry out a given separation, therefore, is a system-specific property and the universal membrane quality test does not exist. In general, specific permeation measurements at different temperatures, either of single gases (or vapors) or of multicomponent mixtures in the gas or liquid (pervaporation) phase, provide extremely useful information on the effective pore structure of the membrane, on the... 

As can be expected, some chemicals are data-rich while others are data-poor. Often they are data-poor, especially for chemical mixtures where the data may be adequate, barely adequate or nonexistent for a specific mixture. Thus limited methods are available for the toxicity assessment of chemical mixtures [1,9]. Even though there are various uncertainties and assumptions embedded in these methods, the following three approaches have gained acceptance by the regulatory agencies and the regulated community for risk assessment of mixtures of industrial, occupational, and environmental chemicals. The method employed is on a case-by-case basis, it depends on the exposure scenario and the quality of available data on exposure and toxicity. 

Assessment of the quality of a mixture, or mixedness, is difficult and time consuming. Since the performance of blends is controlled by the optimum degree of dispersion, as well as by other factors e.g., compatibilization, adhesion in solid state, the level of degradation engendered during the blending, etc.), the mixedness must be considered a separated quantity, to be determined independently of the blends performance. 

When a specific mixture is considered, the assessment of the quality of that mixture depends on how closely it is examined. In the case of the pigment dispersion a microscopic examination of the mixture surface could well reveal a lack of colour homogeneity which was not visible to the naked eye. In the limit, if the mixture was examined on the scale of the individual particle then no mixing at all is possible and the mixture would always be unsatisfactory. There is evidently a critical scale of examination of a mixture at which it becomes unsatisfactory. 

An identification of the scale of scrutiny for a product fixes the size of the sample to be taken from the mixture and assessed for mixture quality. It determines how closely the mixture will be examined. The relationship between mixture quality and scale of scrutiny is difficult to predict and as a result a theoretical scaling up or down of mixture quality with a scale of scrutiny should be avoided. It is much safer to re-sample the mixture at the new scale of scrutiny. 

Poux and Fayoulle [3] summarized the results of other researchers investigating the effect of sample size on assessment of the quality of a mixture. The size of the sample must be adapted to the dimensions of the powder material, whose distribution in the mixture must be determined. 

When epidemiological studies form the basis for the risk assessment of a single chemical or even complex mixtures, such as various combustion emissions, it may be stated that in those cases the effects of combined action of chemicals have been incorporated. Examples can, for instance, be found in the updated WHO Air Quality guidelines (WHO 2000). Thus, the guideline value for, e.g., ozone was derived from epidemiological studies of persons exposed to ozone as part of the total mixture of chemicals in polluted ambient air. In addition, the risk estimate for exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons was derived from studies on coke-oven workers heavily exposed to benzo[fl]pyrene as a component of a mixture of PAH and possibly many other chemicals at the workplace. Therefore, in some instances the derivation of a tolerable intake for a single compound can be based on studies where the compound was part of a complex chemical mixture. 

The toxicology-based conclusion that the minimum concentration for 2-nitrofluoranthene to be an important human cell mutagen is 1 p.g/g, coupled with air quality sampling data showing its concentrations in respirable particles sampled from ambient air can in fact reach 10 pg/g, provides a useful example of a productive symbiotic interaction between atmospheric chemists and toxicologists. Such interactions are essential for reliable risk assessments of air pollution and human health effects of complex combustion-generated mixtures of gases and particles. 

Concern about the quality of botanical products poses another regulatory challenge. Most botanical products are complex and variable mixtures of constituents too numerous to characterize individually. For many preparations, active ingredients have not been identified and it is thus difficult to quantify strength or potency of the botanical product. Because of the biological nature of botanical products, the assessment of their impurity and stability is often more problematic than that of nonbotanical pure drugs. 

These limitations of the current system of assessing aquatic environment quality indicate that further research and newer, more reliable tools are needed. Such tools introduced into analytical practice would enable fresh information to be obtained. This information would then complement the data obtained from chemical monitoring and would enable the real risk from the presence of a mixture of diverse pollutants in the environment to be adequately assessed. 

---